Stented versus Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Small Aortic Root

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare hemodynamic and perioperative outcomes of stented against stentless aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic root (21 mm or less).

Methods

A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing stentless to stented bioprosthetic valves in small aortic root patients. Odds ratios, weighted mean differences, or standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals were analyzed.

Results

A total of seven studies with a total of 965 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in preoperative baselines including mean age between both groups (P = 0.08), peak aortic valve gradient (P = 0.06), and effective orifice area (P = 0.28), whereas higher mean aortic valve gradient in the stented group (P = 0.007). No difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = 0.74), aortic cross-clamp times (P = 0.88), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.13), and stroke rate (P = 0.56) were noted. However, stented group of patients showed higher rate of patient prosthesis mismatch (P = 0.0001) and longer total hospital stay (P = 0.002). Postoperatively, stentless group showed lower peak and mean aortic valve gradient (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively) with a better effective orifice area (P < 0.00001) at 6 months of follow-up. Mortality rates while in-hospital and at 1 year were similar in both groups (P = 0.94 and P = 0.86, respectively).

Conclusions

Stentless aortic valves offer superior short-term hemodynamic outcomes in patients with small aortic root when compared with stented aortic valves. Although both groups have similar perioperative complications rates, stentless valves bring about a shorter hospital stay. A further large multicenter randomized controlled trial should address the longer-term benefit of stentless aortic valve over stented valve.

Keywords

Aortic valve Aortic valve replacement Stentless bioprostheses Stented bioprostheses Small aortic root

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nishimura

Otto

Bonow

. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252–289.

Dunning

Graham

Thambyrajah

. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2369–2374.

Lindman

Stewart

Pibarot

. Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7: 662–673.

Kunihara

Schmidt

Glombitza

. Root replacement using stentless valves in the small aortic root: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1379–1384.

Ghoneim

Bouhout

Demers

. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: a comparative study among different biological options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1019–1028.

Maselli

Pizio

Bruno

. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:966–971.

Vriz

Aboyans

D'Andrea

. Normal values of aortic root dimensions in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:921–927.

Bahlmann

Cramariuc

Minners

. Small aortic root in aortic valve stenosis: clinical characteristics and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:404–412.

Wollersheim

Kaya

. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses in the small aortic root. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28:390–397.

10.

Shrestha

Maeding

Hoffler

. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:778–782.

11.

Rao

Christakis

Sever

. A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:431–438.

12.

Shalabi

Spiegelstein

Sternik

. Sutureless versus stented valve in aortic valve replacement in patients with small annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:118–122.

13.

Fries

Wendler

Schieffer

. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:817–822.

14.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–341.

15.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.

16.

Brown

O'Brien

. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:82–90.

17.

Jin

Pepper

. Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:95–100.

18.

Hausmann

Nellessen

Hofig

. Flexible aortic valve prostheses: long-term functional results with porcine bioprostheses without mechanical commissure stent and aortic homografts. Z Kardiol. 1991;80:51–58.

19.

Beckmann

Funkat

Lewandowski

. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2014: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:258–269.

20.

Tabata

Umakanthan

Cohn

. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:537–541.

21.

Pepper

Cheng

Stanbridge

. Stentless versus stented bioprosthetic aortic valves: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2008. Innovations. 2009;4:49–60.

22.

Cheng

Pepper

Martin

. Stentless versus stented bioprosthetic aortic valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Innovations. 2009;4:61–73.

23.

Bach

Cartier

Kon

. Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1107–1114.

24.

Borger

Prasongsukarn

Armstrong

. Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:737–744.

25.

Gulbins

Reichenspurner

Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?

Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:2061–2068.

26.

Ali

Halstead

Cafferty

. Early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after stented and stentless aortic valve replacement: results from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:2162–2168.

27.

Santini

Bertolini

Montalbano

. Hancock versus stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:S99–S103.

28.

Chambers

Rimington

Hodson

Rajani

Blauth

. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:878–882.

29.

Dumesnil

Pibarot

Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: the evidence continues to accumulate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:952–955.

30.

Jin

Gibson

Yacoub

. Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented valve in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S395–S401.

31.

Schaefer

Dickow

Schoen

. Stentless vs. stented bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: a case matched comparison of long-term follow-up and subgroup analysis of patients with native valve endocarditis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191171.

32.

Rahimtoola

. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:893–904.

33.

Luciani

Casali

Auriemma

. Survival after stentless and stented xenograft aortic valve replacement: a concurrent, controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1443–1449.

34.

Funder

. Current status on stentless aortic bioprosthesis: a clinical and experimental perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:790–799.

35.

Pibarot

Dumesnil

. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131–1141.

36.

Blackstone

Cosgrove

Jamieson

. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:783–796.

37.

Song

Lehr

Wang

An alternative subcoronary implantation technique decreases the risk of complete heart block after stentless aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012;3:46–51.

38.

El-Hamamsy

Clark

Stevens

. Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:368–376.

39.

Villa

Messina

Laborde

. Challenge for Perceval: aortic valve replacement with small sutureless valves—a multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1248–1254.

40.

Del Rizzo

Goldman

Christakis

. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto Stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1431–1446.

41.

David

Pollick

Bos

Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:113–118.

42.

Rajappan

Rimoldi

Camici

. Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2003;107:3170–3175.

43.

Westaby

Horton

Jin

. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:785–791.

44.

Hazekamp

Goffin

Huysmans

. The value of the stentless biovalve prosthesis. An experimental study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993;7:514–519.

45.

Grunkemeier

Furnary

. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:1381–1386.

46.

Bashir

Harky

Bleetman

. Aortic valve replacement: are we spoiled for choice? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:265–272.

47.

Harky

Fok

Froghi

. Valve-sparing aortic root repair compared to composite aortic root replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Nov;26:632–638.

48.

Harky

Chan

Skj

Grafton-Clarke

. The impact of dedicated aortic teams and centralisation of aortic services, and surgeon or Centre specific volumes on outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection. J Cardiol Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;12:555828.

49.

Bashir

Harky

Froghi

. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanical vs. biological composite aortic root replacement, early and 1-year results. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0845-2.

50.

Harky

Chan

Jsk

Ahmad

. Stented versus stentless aortic valve replacement in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vis Surg. 2018. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.08.17.