Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is emerging as a powerful noninvasive diagnostic tool. The appropriate role of this technique in the preoperative evaluation of cardiovascular disease has yet to be fully defined. Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and novel minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed to treat this condition by electrically isolating the pulmonary veins. The ideal methodology to preoperatively evaluate these patients remains debatable. We hypothesized that 64-slice CT could significantly affect perioperative planning.
Methods
Thirty-six consecutive patients who consented to undergo minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation at our institution underwent a preoperative 64-slice cardiac CT scan. All cardiac and noncardiac abnormalities were recorded, and modifications to the initial surgical plan were documented.
Results
The mean patient age was 64.4 ± 11.9 years [26 men (72.2%), 17 with known coronary artery disease (47.2%)]. Preoperative CT scanning detected 12 patients with abnormal pulmonary venous anatomy (33.3%), 3 with left atrial thrombus (8.3%), and 17 with significant coronary artery disease (47.2%). Furthermore, 20 studies (55.6%) detected pulmonary abnormalities (including 11 nodules). Preoperative scanning significantly altered surgical planning in 10 cases (27.8%). Alterations in patient treatment included preoperative invasive angiography, conversion of the mini-maze to an open chest procedure, alteration of surgical approach, and postponement/cancellation.
Conclusions
Sixty-four-slice CT scanning is a safe, rapid, and accurate procedure with important ramifications for surgical planning. This methodology could become an alternative approach to screen preoperative cardiac surgical patients.
EagleK.A., BergerP.B., CalkinsH. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). [American College of Cardiology Web site]. August 1, 2005. Available at: http:/www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/perio/dirIndex.htm. Accessed August 1, 2005.
2.
CasulaR., AthanasiouT., FoaleR.Recent advances in minimal-access cardiac surgery using robotic-enhanced surgical systems. Exp Rev Cardiovasc Ther.2004; 2: 589–600.
3.
Giedrius DavidaviciusG., Van PraeF.T., MansourS.Hybrid revascularization strategy: A pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation.2005; 112: I-317–I-322.
4.
LewisB.S., PoratE., HalonD.A.Same-day combined coronary angioplasty and minimally invasive coronary surgery. Am J Cardiol.1999; 84: 1246–1247.
5.
IzzatM.B., YimA.P., MehtaD.Staged minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and percutaneous angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol.1997; 62: S105–S109.
6.
IvertT.S.A., EkestromS., PeterffyA.Coronary artery reoperations: early and late results in 101 patients. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1998; 22: 111–118.
7.
BaillotR.G., LoopR.D., CosgroveD.M.Reoperation after previous grafting with the internal mammary artery: Technique and early results. Ann Thorac Surg.1985; 40: 271–273.
8.
VerkkalaK., JarvinenA., VirtanenK.Indications for and the risks in reoperation for coronary artery disease. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1990; 24: 1–6.
9.
MisakiT., FukaharaK.Recent topics on the surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2004; 10: 277–280.
10.
SieH.T., BeukemaW.P., ElvanA.Long-term results of irrigated radiofrequency modified maze procedure in 200 patients with concomitant cardiac surgery: Six years experience. Ann Thorac Surg.2004; 77: 512–516.
11.
PrasadS.M., ManiarH.S., CamilloC.J.The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: Long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2003; 126: 1822–1828.
12.
DamianoR.J.Jr., GaynorS.L., BaileyM.The long-term outcome of patients with coronary disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing the Cox maze procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2003; 126: 2016–2021.
SamynM.M.A review of the complementary information available with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography (CT) during the study of congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2004; 20: 569–578.
16.
HerzogC., Wimmer-GreineckerG., SchwarzW.Progress in CT imaging for the cardiac surgeon. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2004; 16: 242–248.
17.
GhayeB., SzapiroD., DacherJ.N.Percutaneous ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of cross-sectional imaging. Radiographics.2003; 23: S19–S33.
18.
WolfR.K., SchneebergerE.W., OsterdayR.Video-assisted bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2005; 130: 797–802.
19.
MaromE., HerndonJ., KimY.Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: Implications for radiofrequency ablation. Radiology.2004; 230: 824–829.
20.
CarerjS., TrifiroM.P., GranataA.Comparison between transesoph-ageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography with harmonic tissue imaging for left atrial appendage assessment. Clin Cardiol.2002; 25: 268–270.
21.
DesaiM.Y., KimY.Y., KleinA.L.Accuracy of MDCT in assessment of left atrial appendage filling defects in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency pulmonary vein antral isolation. Abstract. J Cardiovasc Imaging.2006; 22: 28–29.
22.
JensenJ.L., WilliamsF.E., BeilbyB.Feasibility of obtaining pulmonary venous flow velocity in cardiac patients using transthoracic pulsed wave Doppler technique. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.1997; 10: 60–66.
23.
ArtusoE., StomaciB., VerlatoR.Transesophageal echocardiographic follow-up of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ital Heart J.2005; 6: 595–600.
24.
RaffG.L., GallagherM.J., O'NeillW.W.Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol.2005; 46: 552–557.
25.
LeschkaS., AlkadhiH., PlassA.Accuracy of MSCT angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J.2005; 26: 1482–1487.
26.
StrubW.M., VagalA., MeyerC.Optimizing coronary artery imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. AJR.2007; 189: W50–W51.
27.
WestR.R., EllisG.R., BrooksN.Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterization: Results from a confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. Heart.2005; 24: [Epub ahead of print].
28.
DuffinD.C., MuhlesteinJ.B., AllissonS.B.Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol.2001; 13: 354–362.
29.
MeyersonS.L., FeldmanT., DesaiT.R.Angiographic access site complications in the era of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovascular Surg.2002; 36: 137–144.
30.
AgostoniP., Biondi-ZoccaiG.G., de BenedictisM.L.Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol.2004; 44: 349–356.
31.
HunoldP., VogtF.M., SchmermundA.Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: Effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology.2003; 226: 145–152.
32.
MorinR., GerberT., CynthiaH.McCollough radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation.2003; 107: 917–922.
33.
CreanA., DutkaD., CouldenR.Cardiac imaging using nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography. Radiol Clin North Am.2004; 42: 619–634.
34.
RaoD.V., ShepstoneB.J., WilkinsH.B.Kinetics and dosimetry of thallium-201 in human testes. J Nucl Med.1995; 36: 607–609.
35.
Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service:Clinical and business aspects. Prepared jointly by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society, and the British Nuclear Medicine Society. Heart.2005; 91(suppl IV): iv6–iv14.
HortonK.M., PostW.S., BlumenthalR.S.Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation.2002; 106: 532–534.
38.
SchraginJ.G., WeissfeldJl, EdmundowiczD.Non-cardiac findings on coronary electron beam computed tomography scanning. J Thorac Imaging.2004; 19: 82–86.
39.
HunoldP., SchmermundA., SeibelR.M.Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J.2001; 22: 1748–1758.
40.
MeijboomW.B., MolletN.R., Van MieghemC.Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol.2006; 48: 1658–1665.
