For Weberian Marxists, the social theories of Max Weber and Karl Marx are complementary contributions to the analysis of modern capitalist society. Combining Weber's theory of rationalization with Marx's critique of commodity fetishism to develop his own critique of reification, Georg Lukács contended that the combination of Marx's and Weber's social theories is essential to envisioning socially transformative modes of praxis in advanced capitalist society. By comparing Lukács ‘s theory of reification with Habermas's theory of communicative action as two theories in the tradition of Weberian Marxism, I show how the prevailing mode of “doing theory” has shifted from Marx's critique of economic determinism to Weber's idea of the inner logic of social value spheres. Today, Weberian Marxism can make an important contribution to theoretical sociology by reconstituting itself as a framework for critically examining prevailing societal definitions of the rationalization imperatives specific to purposive-rational social value spheres (the economy, the administrative state, etc.). In a second step, Weberian Marxists would explore how these value spheres relate to each other and to value spheres that are open to the type of communicative rationalization characteristic of the lifeworld level of social organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggerBen1979. Western Marxism: An Introduction. Classical and Contemporary Sources.Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear.
2.
AndersonPerry1976. Considerations on Western Marxism.London: NLB.
3.
AratoAndrewBreinesPaul1979. The Young Lukács and the Origins of Western Marxism.New York: Seabury.
4.
CalhounCraig1995. Critical Social Theory: Culture, History, and the Challenge of Difference.Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
5.
ColemanJames S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
6.
CongdonLee1983. The Young Lukács.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
7.
DahmsHarry F. Forthcoming. “Beyond the Carousel of Reification: Critical Social Theory After Lukács, Adorno, and Habermas.”Current Perspectives in Social Theory18.
8.
DahrendorfRalf1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9.
FeenbergAndrew1981. Lukács, Marx and the Sources of Critical Theory.Oxford: Martin Robertson.
10.
FeherFerenc1977. “Am Scheideweg des romantischen Antikapitalismus.” Pp. 241–327. in Die Seele und das Leben: Studien zum frühen Lukács, edited by HellerAgnes. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
11.
GrondinJean1988. “Reification from Lukács to Habermas.” Pp. 86–107 in Lukács Today: Essays in Marxist Philosophy, edited by RockmoreTom. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
12.
HabermasJürgen1954. “Die Dialektik der Rationalisierung. Vom Pauperismus in Produktion und Konsum.”, Merkur8(8): 701–24.
13.
HabermasJürgen1957. “Literaturbericht zur philosophischen Diskussion um Marx und den Marxismus.” Pp. 387–463 in Theorie und Praxis.Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
14.
HabermasJürgen [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, translated by BurgerT.LawrenceF.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
15.
HabermasJürgen1971. Theorie und Praxis.Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
16.
HabermasJürgen [1971] 1973. Theory and Practice, translated by ViertelJohn. Boston: Beacon Press.
17.
HabermasJürgen [1976] 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society, translated by McCarthyThomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
18.
HabermasJürgen [1981] 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I, translated by McCarthyThomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
19.
HabermasJürgen [1981] 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. II, translated by McCarthyThomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
20.
HabermasJürgen1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln.Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
21.
HabermasJürgen1984. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns.Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
22.
HabermasJürgen. [1985] 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures, translated by LawrenceFrederick. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23.
HabermasJürgen1986. Autonomy and Solidarity. Interviews. edited by PeterDews. London: Verso.
HabermasJürgen [1988] 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, translated by MarkHohengarten William. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26.
HabermasJürgen1991a. Texte und Kontexte.Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
27.
HabermasJürgen1991b. “What Does Socialism Mean Today?” Pp. 25–46 in After the Fall: The Failure of Communism and the Future of Socialism, edited by BlackburnRobin. New York: Verso.
28.
HabermasJürgen [1991] 1993. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics, translated by CroninCiaran. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
29.
HabermasJürgen [1992] 1996. Between Fact and Norm. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30.
HabermasJürgen [1993] 1994. “What Theories Can Accomplish—and What They Can't.” Pp. 99–120 in The Past as Future, edited by MichaelHallerPenskyMax. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31.
HazelriggLawrence E.1993. “Marx and the Meter of Nature.”, Rethinking Marxism6(2):104–22.
32.
HellerAgnes1982. “Habermas and Marxism.” Pp. 21–41 in Habermas'–Critical Debates, edited by ThompsonJohn B.HeldDavid. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
33.
HonnethAxel [1990] 1995. The Fragmented World of the Social.Albany: State University of New York Press.
34.
JayMartin1984. Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas.Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
JonesGareth Stedman et.al. 1977. Western Marxism. A Critical Reader.Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
36.
KadarkayArpad1991. Georg Lukács: Life, Thought, and Politics.Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
37.
KlineGeorge L.1987. “Lukács's Use and Abuse of Hegel and Marx.” Pp. 1–25 in George Lukács and His World—A Reassessment, edited by JoosErnest. New York: Peter Lang.
38.
LevineNorman1991. “On the Transcendence of State and Revolution” edited by ErnestJoos. Pp. 3–62 in Lukács, (Introduction). Georg 1991. The Process of Democratization.Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
LiebersohnHarry1988. Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
40.
LöwyMichael1979. Georg Lukács: From Romanticism to Bolshevism.London: New Left Books.
41.
LöwyMichael1989. “Naphta or Settembrini?—Lukács and Romantic Anticapitalism.” Pp. 189–203 in Georg Lukács: Theory, Culture, and Politics, edited by MarcusJudithTarrZoltán. New Brunswick: Transaction.
42.
LöwyMichael1996. “Figures of Weberian Marxism.”, Theory and Society25:431–46.
43.
LoveNancy S.1995. “What's left of Marx?” Pp. 46–63 in The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, edited by WhiteStephen K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
LukácsGeorg [1911] 1974. Soul and Form.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. translated by BostockAnna.
45.
LukácsGeorg [1920] 1971. Theory of the Wovel, translated by BostochAnna. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
46.
LukácsGeorg [1923] 1971. History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics, by RodneyLivingstone. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
47.
LukácsGeorg [1924] 1971. Lenin: A Study on the Unity of His Thought, translated by JacobsNicholas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
48.
LukácsGeorg1974. Heidelberger Philosophie der Kunst (1912–1914).Darmstadt/Neuwied: Luchterhand.
LukácsGeorg [1980] 1983. Record of a Life. An Autobiographical Sketch, translated by LivingstoneRodneyEörsiIstvan. London: Verso.
51.
LukácsGeorg1991. The Process of Democratization, translated by BernhardtS.LevineN.. Albany: State University of New York Press.
52.
Merleau-PontyMaurice [1955] 1973. Adventures of the Dialectic, translated by BienJoseph. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
53.
MertonRobert K.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure.New York: Free Press.
54.
MouzelisNicos1995. Sociological Theory: What went wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies.London: Routledge.
55.
MurrayPatrick1988. Marx's Theory of Scientific Knowledge.Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
56.
PostoneMoishe1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination. A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RockmoreTom1987. “Lukács’ Marxist Hegel.” Pp. 27–41 in George Lukács and His World: A Reassessment, edited by JoosErnest. New York: Peter Lang.
58.
RockmoreTom1989. Habermas on Historical Materialism.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
59.
SayerDerek1987. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytical Foundations of Historical Materialism.New York: Basil Blackwell.
60.
SchluchterWolfgang1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism. Max Weber's Developmental History, translated by RothGuenther. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61.
SchluchterWolfgang1989. Rationalism, Religion, and Domination. A Weberian Perspective, translated by SolomonNeil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
SchnädelbachHerbert1984. Philosophy in Germany, 1831–1933, translated by MatthewsEric. Cambridge, GB: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SchumpeterJoseph A.1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.New York: Harper and Brothers.
65.
SiemekMarek J.1986. “Lukács: Marxismus als Philosophie.” Pp. 83–101 in GeorgLukács—Ersehnte Totalität (Vol. 1 of the Bloch-Lukács-Symposium 1985 in Dubrovnik), edited by GozdanFlegoSchmied-KowarzikWolfdietrich. Bochum: Germinal.
66.
TherbornGöran1996. “Dialectics of Modernity: On Critical Theory and the Legacy of Twentieth-Century Marxism.”, New Left Review215(Jan./Feb.):59–81.
67.
WeberMax [1922] 1978. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, translated by FischoffE.RothGuentherWittichClaus. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
WeberMax [1922] 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie.5th ed.Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
69.
WeberMax1946. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” Pp. 267–301 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH. H.WrightMills C.. New York: Oxford University Press, Pp. 267–301.
70.
WellmerAlbrecht [1969] 1971. Critical Theory of Society, translated by CummingJohn. New York: Continuum.
71.
WellmerAlbrecht1976. “Communication and Emancipation: Reflections on the Linguistic Turn in Critical Theory.” Pp. 231–263 in On Critical Theory, edited by O'NeillJohn. New York: Seabury Press.
72.
WellmerAlbrecht [1986] 1993. “Die Bedeutung der Frankfurter Schule heute. Fünf Thesen.” Pp. 224–35 in Endspiele: Die unversöhnliche Moderne.Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
73.
WhiteSteven K.1988. The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity.New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WiggershausRolf1986. Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte—Theoretische Entwicklung—Politische Bedeutung.München: Hanser.
75.
WinklerWilli1996. “Neues zur Gründungslegende der Bundesrepublik: Horkheimer gegen Habermas, dazwischen Adorno.”Die Zeit39, 20 September.
