This paper intends to evaluate two competing models of multicultural integration in stratified societies: the “multiple publics” model of Nancy Fraser and the “fragmented public sphere” model of Jeffrey Alexander. Fraser and Alexander disagree on whether or not claims to a general “common good” or “common humanity” are democratically legitimate in light of systemic inequality. Fraser rejects the idea that cultural integration can be democratic in conditions of social inequality, while Alexander accepts it and tries to explain how it may be realized. In order to address this debate, I analyze the cultural foundations of the female-led, maternally themed social movements of nineteenth-century America. The language of these movements supports Alexander's position over Fraser's, though it also suggests that Alexander is mistaken in the specifics of his cultural theory of a general and democratic “common good.” While Alexander's model of integration is structured uniquely by what he and Philip Smith have called “the discourse of civil society,” the evidence suggests a distinctly alternative, equally democratic code at play in this case, which I have labeled a discourse of affection and compassion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddamsJane1912. Why Women Should Vote. New York: National American Woman Suffrage Association. Adovate of Moral Reform. 1935. June, p. 43.
2.
AlexanderJeffrey1991. “Bringing Democracy Back In: Universalistic Solidarity and the Civil Sphere.” Pp. 157–76 in Intellectuals and Politics: Social Theory in a Changing World, edited by LemertCharles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AlexanderJeffrey1996. “Collective Action, Culture, and Civil Society: Secularizing, Updating, Inverting, Revising, and Displacing the Classical Model of Social Movements.” Pp. 205–34 in Alain Touraine, edited by ClarkJonDianiMarco. London: Falmer Press.
4.
AlexanderJeffrey1997. “The Paradoxes of Civil Society.”, International Sociology12(2): 115–33.
5.
AlexanderJeffrey1998. “Civil Society between Difference and Solidarity: Rethinking Integration in the Fragmented Public Sphere.”Theoria (December): 1–14.
6.
AlexanderJeffrey Forthcoming. “Rethinking Difference: Assimilation, Hyphenation, and Multiculturalism as Modes of Democratic Incorporation.”Constellations.
7.
AlexanderJeffreySmithPhilip1993. “The Discourse of American Civil Society.”, Theory and Society22:151–207.
8.
AshbyLeRoy1997. Endangered Children: Dependency, Neglect, and Abuse in American History. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9.
BakerPaula1984. “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920.”, American Historical Review89:620–47.
10.
BaymNina1978. Woman's Fiction: A Guide to Novels by and about Women in America, 1820–1870. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11.
BeecherStowe Harriet1871. My Wife and I.New York: J. B. Ford.
12.
BenhabibSeyla1992. Situating the Self.Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BlochRuth1978. “American Feminine Ideals in Transition: The Rise of the Moral Mother 1785–1815.”, Feminist Studies4(June): 100–26.
14.
BlochRuth1987. “The Gendered Meanings of Virtue in Revolutionary America,”, Signs13(autumn): 37–58.
15.
BordinRuth1981. Women and Temperance: The Quest for Power and Liberty, 1873–1900.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
BoydstonJeanneKelleyMaryMargolisAnne (eds.). 1988. The Limits of Sisterhood: The Beecher Sisters on Women's Rights and Women's Sphere.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
17.
BowmanNancy1996. “Caroline Healy Dall: Her Creation and Reform Career.” Pp. 121–46 in Women of the Commonwealth: Work, Family, and Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Massachusetts, edited by PorterSusan L.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
18.
CalhounCraig1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere.Cambridge: MIT Press.
19.
CarnesMark1989. Secret Ritual and Manhood in Victorian America.New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
CarnesMarkGriffenClyde (eds.). 1990. Meanings for Manhood: Constructions of Masculinity in Victorian America.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CohenJeanAratoAndrew1995. Civil Society and Political Theory.Cambridge: MIT Press.
22.
ClintonCatherine1982. The Plantation Mistress: Woman's World in the Old South.New York: Pantheon.
23.
CottNancy1977. The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere’ in New England, 1780–1835.New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
DawsonMichael1995. “A Black Counterpublic? Economic Earthquakes, Racial Agenda(s), and Black Politics.”, Public Culture7(3): 133–78.
25.
EleyGeoff1992. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century.” Pp. 289–339in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounCraig. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
EpsteinBarbara1981. The Politics of Domesticity: Women, Evangelism, and Temperance in Nineteenth Century America.Middletown, CT: Weslayan University Press.
27.
FlexnerEleanor1975. Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28.
FraserNancy1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Pp. 109–42 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounCraig. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29.
FraserNancy1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist’ Condition.New York: Routledge.
30.
GenoveseElizabeth Fox1988. Within the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
31.
GilliganCarol1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
HabermasJurgen [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.Cambridge: MIT Press.
33.
HabermasJurgen1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by McCarthyThomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
34.
HabermasJurgen1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by LenhardtChristianNicholsenShierry Weber. Cambridge: MIT Press.
HabermasJurgen1992b. “Reflections on the Public Sphere.” Pp.4xx–4xx in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounCraig. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37.
HabermasJurgen1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by RehgWilliam. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
HabermasJurgen1998a. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Edited by CookMaeve. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39.
HabermasJurgen1998b. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by CroninCiaranDe GreifPabloCambridge: MIT Press.
40.
HansenDebra Gold1993. Strained Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Boston Female Anti-Slavery Society.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
41.
HobsonBarbara Meil1987. Uneasy Virtue: The Politics of Prostitution and the American Reform Tradition.New York: Basic Books.
42.
JablonskyThomas1994. The Home, Heaven, and Mother Party: Female Anti-Suffragists in the United States, 1868–1920.Brooklyn: Carlson Publishing.
43.
JeffreyJulie Roy1979. Frontier Women: The Trans-Mississippi West 1840–1880.New York: Hill and Wang.
44.
JeffreyJulie Roy1998. The Great Silent Army of Abolitionism: Ordinary Women in the Antislavery Movement.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
45.
KellyMary1983. Private Woman, Public Stage: Literary Domesticity in Nineteenth Century America.New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
KerberLinda1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
47.
KimmelMichael1995. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. New York: Free Press.
48.
LandesJoan1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
49.
LawesCarolyn2000. Women and Reform in a New England Community 1815–1860. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
50.
LutzAlma1968. Crusade for Freedom: Women of the Antislavery Movement. Boston: Beacon Press.
51.
MarshallSusan1997. Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Campaign against Woman Suffrage. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
McCarthyThomas1992. “Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics.” Pp. 52–72 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounCraig. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53.
MedlerKeith1977. Beginnings of Sisterhood: The American Woman's Rights Movement, 1800–1850. New York: Schocken Books.
54.
MelucciAlberto1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
NortonMary Beth1980. Liberty's Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 1750–1800. Boston: Little, Brown.
56.
PatemanCarole1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
PeaseJanePeaseWilliam1990. Choice and Constraint in Antebellum Charleston and Boston. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
58.
PleckElizabeth1987. Domestic Tyranny: The Making of Social Policy against Family Violence from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
PutnamRobert1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
60.
PutnamRobert2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
61.
RotundoE. Anthony1990. American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity from the Revolution to the Modern Era. New York: Basic Books.
62.
RuddickSara1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press.
63.
RyanMary1981. Cradle of the Middle Class: The Family in Oneida County, New York, 1790–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
RyanMary1982. Empire of the Mother: American Writing about Domesticity 1830–1860. New York: Hawthorn Press.
65.
RyanMary1990. Women in Public: Between Banners and Ballots, 1825–1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
66.
RyanMary1992. “Gender and Public Access,” Pp. 259–88 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounCraig. Cambridge: MIT Press.
67.
RyanMary1997. Wars: Democracy in Public Life in the American City during the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
Sanchez-EpplerKaren1995. “Temperance in the Bed of a Child: Incest and Social Order in Nineteenth Century America.”, American Quarterly47:1–33.
69.
ScottAnne1970. The Southern Lady: From Pedestal to Politics, 1830–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
ScottJoan1986. “Gender: A Useful Category for Historical Analysis.”American Historical Review, 91(5): 1053–75.
71.
Smith-RosenbergCarroll1971. Religion and the Rise of the American City: The New York City Mission Movement, 1812–1870. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
72.
Smith-RosenbergCarroll1975. “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America.”, Signs1: 1–30.
73.
StansellChristine1987. City of Women: Sex and Class in New York 1789–1860. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
74.
StevensonDrenda1996. Life in Black and White: Family and Community in the Slave South. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
StoneLucy1853. The Whole World's Temperance Convention, held at the Metropolitan Hall in the City of New York on the Thursday and Friday, September 1st and 2nd. New York: Fowler and Wells.
76.
TonkovichNicole1997. Domesticity with a Difference: The Nonfiction of Catharine Beecher, Sarah J. Hale, Fanny Fern, and Margaret Fuller. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
77.
TrontoJoan1987. “Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care.”, Signs12:644–63.
78.
VenetWendy Hamand1991. Neither Ballots nor Bullets: Women Abolitionists and the Civil War. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
79.
WelterBarbara1966. “The Cult of True Womanhood.”, American Quarterly18(summer): 151–74.
80.
WhiteDeborah1987. Ar'n't I a Woman: Female Slaves in the Plantation South.New York: W. W. Norton.
81.
WhiteakerLarry1977. “Moral Reform and Prostitution in New York City, 1830–1860.” Dissertation, Princeton University.
82.
WillardFrancis [1889] 1987. The Defense of Women's Rights to Ordination in the Methodist Episcopal Church. Edited by De Swarte GiffordCarolyn. New York: Garland Publishing.
83.
WoodburyHenry1852. “Woman in Her Social Relations.”Godey's Lady's Book, July, 333–37.
84.
YellinJean FaganVan HorneJohn C. (eds.). 1994. Abolitionist Sisterhood: Women's Political Culture in Antebellum America.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
85.
YoungIris Marion1988. Justice and the Politics of Difference.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
86.
ZagarriRosemarie1992. “Morals, Manners, and the Republican Mother.”, American Quarterly44(2):192–215.
