Uses ‘discursive institutionalism’ as its analytic framework, by focusing on the wide range of EU leaders’ ideas about the crisis and how they have communicated about them.
Examines the different ways in which the scholarly literature analyzes those ideas and discursive interactions, and how they lead one to consider different aspects of the crisis.
Argues that there are disconnects between what EU leaders say to one another in the ‘coordinative discourse’ at the EU level and between what they say about those agreements to the markets and to the people in the ‘communicative discourse’.
Suggests, with regard to the markets specifically, that EU leaders have proposed solutions that were seen as too little too late; were considered to be the wrong solutions; or raised new contingencies that the markets themselves had not anticipated.
Shows, with regard to the people, that EU leaders' communication of the wrong or misleading messages meant that national publics were often not prepared for the reform initiatives taken, and that this has often left the field open to the extremes of the right and left.
The EU's sovereign debt crisis is not just economic; it is also political, resulting from the failure of EU leaders to offer solutions that calm the markets and convince the people. These failures stem from problems with EU leaders' ideas about how to solve the crisis as well as their communication about them. That communication encompasses not just EU leaders talking to one another in negotiations of crisis solutions but also speaking to ‘the markets’ and to ‘the people’ about those solutions, all of which may interact in perverse ways. This article uses the analytic framework of ‘discursive institutionalism’ to consider the different forms, types, levels, rates and mechanisms of change in ideas followed by the EU leaders'discursive interactions in the ‘coordinative’ discourse and their ‘communicative discourse’ to the global markets and European publics. It uses a range of country cases, but in particular Germany and France, in illustration.
AsmussenJ. (2012) ‘Building trust in a world of unknown unknowns: Central Bank communication between markets and politics in the crisis’. Speech at the European Communication Summit 2012, Brussels, 6 July.
2.
BalM. (2009) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press).
3.
BaumgartnerF. R.JonesB. D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
4.
BélandD.CoxR. H. (eds) (2010) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
5.
BermanS. (1998) The Social Democratic Movement: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
6.
BermanS. (2006) The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7.
BevirM.RhodesR. A. W. (2003) Interpreting British Governance (London: Routledge).
8.
BlythM. (1997) ‘“Any more bright ideas?” The ideational turn in comparative political economy’, Comparative Politics, 29:2, 229–250.
9.
CampbellJ. L. (1998) ‘Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy’, Theory and Society, 27, 377–409.
10.
CampbellJ. L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
11.
CampbellJ. L.PedersenO. K. (2010) ‘Knowledge regimes and comparative political economy’, in BelandD.CoxR. H. (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–190.
12.
CarstensenM. B. (2011) ‘Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur’, European Political Science Review, 3:147–167.
13.
CrespyA. (2013) ‘A dialogue of the deaf? Conflicting discourses over the EU and services liberalisation in the WTO’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16:1, 168–187.
14.
CrespyA.SchmidtV. (2012) ‘The Clash of Titans/ The White Knight and the Iron Lady: France, Germany and the discursive double game of EMU Reform’. Paper prepared for presentation to the ECSA-Canada Biennial Conference’, 27–28 April.
15.
De VilleF.OrbieJ. (2013) ‘The European Commission's neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: Legitimizing continuity through subtle discursive change’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16:1, 149–167.
16.
SalaDella V. (2012) ‘Crisis, what crisis? Narrating crisis and decline in the European Union’. Paper prepared for presentation to the ECSA-Canada Biennial Conference, 27–28 April.
17.
EriksenE. O.FossumJ. E. (2002) ‘Democracy through strong publics in the European Union?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:3, 401–424.
18.
FinnemoreM. (1996) ‘Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology's institutionalism’, International Organization, 50:2, 325–347.
19.
FischerF. (1993) ‘Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks’, in FischerF.ForesterD. (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press, 21–42.
20.
FoucaultM. (2000) Power (New York: New Press).
21.
FoucaultM. (2004) Naissance De La Biopolitique: Cours Au Collège De France, 1978–1979 (Paris: Gallimard/Seuil).
22.
FreedenM. (2003) Ideology: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
23.
FroudJ.NilssonA.MoranM.WilliamsK. (2012) ‘Stories and interests in finance: Agendas of governance before and after the financial crisis’, Governance, 25:1, 35–59.
24.
GambleA. (2013) ‘Globalization and macro-economic management: The theory and practice of fiscal conservatism’, in SchmidtV. A.ThatcherM. (eds), Resilient Liberalism: European Political Economy through Boom and Bust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), forthcoming.
25.
HaasP. M. (1992) ‘Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization, 46, 1–35.
26.
HabermasJ. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans. BurgerT.LawrenceF.. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
27.
HajerM. (1993) ‘Discourse coalitions in practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain’, in FischerF.ForesterJ. (eds), The Argumentative Turn (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 43–76.
28.
HallP. (1989) ‘Conclusion’, in HallP. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 360–391.
29.
HallP. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy-making in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.
30.
JobertB. (1989) ‘The normative frameworks of public policy’, Political Studies, 37, 376–386.
JonesE. (2013) ‘The collapse of the Brussels-Frankfurt consensus and the future of the Euro’, in SchmidtV. A.ThatcherM. (eds), Resilient Liberalism: European Political Economy through Boom and Bust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), forthcoming.
33.
KingdonJ. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (New York: Longman).
34.
KuhnT. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn) (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
35.
LakatosI. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in LakatosI.MusgraveA. (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–196.
36.
LaudanL. (1977) Progress and its Problems (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
37.
LehmbruchG. (2001) ‘Institutional embedding of market economies: The German model and its impact on Japan’, in StreeckW.YamamuraK. (eds), The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 39–93.
38.
MacNamaraK. (1999) The Currency of Ideas (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
39.
MirowskiP.PlehweD. (2009) The Road from Mont Pélerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
40.
MorinJ.-F.CartaC. (2013) Overlapping and evolving European discourses on market liberalization’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16:1, 117–132.
41.
MullerP. (1995) ‘Les politiques publiques comme construction d'un rapport au monde’, in FaureA.PolletG.WarinP. (eds), La Construction Du Sens Dans Les Politiques Publiques (Paris: L'Harmattan, 153–179.
42.
MutzD.SnidermanP.BrodyR. (1996) Political Persuasion and Attitude Change (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
43.
NordP. (2010) France's New Deal (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
44.
OverbeekH.Van ApeldoornB. (2012) Neoliberalism in Crisis (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
45.
PtakR. (2009) ‘Neoliberalism in Germany: Revisiting the ordo-liberal foundations of the social market economy’, in MirowskiP.PlehweD. (eds), The Mont Pélerin Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 98–138.
46.
ReinM.SchönD. A. (1994) Frame Reflection Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic).
47.
RoeE. (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
48.
RosamondB. (2013) ‘Three ways of speaking Europe to the world: Markets, peace, cosmopolitan duty and the EU's normative power’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16:1, 133–148.
49.
RothsteinB. (2005) Social Traps and the Problem of Trust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
50.
SabatierP. (1993) ‘Policy change over a decade or more’, in Jenkins-SmithH. C.SabatierP. (eds), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder, CO: Westview, 13–40.
51.
SchmidtV. A. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
52.
SchmidtV. A. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
53.
SchmidtV. A. (2008) ‘Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
54.
SchmidtV. A. (2010) The European Union's Eurozone crisis and what (not) to do about it’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 17:1, 199–214.
55.
SchmidtV. A. (2011) ‘Ideas and discourse in transformational political economic change in Europe’, in SkogstadG. (ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics (Toronto, ON: Toronto University Press, 36–63.
56.
SchmidtV. A. (2012) France's postwar model from the state in action to a state of mind: A review essay of Philip Nord's New Deal’, French Politics, 10:2, 196–208.
57.
SchmidtV. A.ThatcherM. (2013) ‘Introduction’, in SchmidtV. A.ThatcherM. (eds), Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), forthcoming.
58.
SkogstadG.SchmidtV. A. (2011) ‘Introduction: Internationalization and policy paradigms’, in SkogstadG. (ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics (Toronto, ON: Toronto University Press, 3–35.
59.
StoneD. (1988) Policy Paradox and Political Reason (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman).
60.
WeirM. (1992) Politics and Jobs: The Boundaries of Employment Policy in the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
61.
WendlerF. (2012) ‘Debating the European debt crisis’. Paper prepared for presentation to the ECSA-Canada Biennial Conference, 27–28 April.
62.
WolfM. (2011) ‘Thinking through the unthinkable’, Financial Times, 8 November.
