The Unsolved Puzzle: Pacific Asia's Voting Cohesion in the United Nations General Assembly

Abstract

Research Highlights and Abstract

This article

Offers a refined research design for analysing voting cohesion in the United Nations General Assembly;

Demonstrates that ASEAN's integration process is unlikely to explain the observed high level of voting cohesion in Pacific Asia;

Specifies the ASEAN-China and ASEAN-Japan alignment;

Shows that the alignment of South Korea is closer with the USA than with North Korea in contested votes in the United Nations General Assembly.

In this paper, we propose a refined research agenda for analysing voting cohesion in the United Nations General Assembly. Although we respond specifically to Ferdinand, our four points of critique and suggestions concerning the research design are applicable to a larger corpus of literature. First, we include a longer period of observation to interpret the effects of regional integration. Second, we demonstrate the necessity to control for the year of accession of member states. Third, we propose to look at time series rather than arithmetical means to compare changes in voting cohesion. Finally, we exclude nearly unanimous votes from our analysis to enhance the explanatory values of our cases. This refined design has important effects on the analysis of Pacific Asia's voting cohesion in the UNGA. We conclude from our findings that regional integration is unlikely to explain the high level of voting cohesion within ASEAN and the region.

Keywords

voting cohesion Pacific Asia ASEAN UNGA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beeson

and Stubbs

(2012) The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (London: Routledge).

Dent

C. M.

(2008) China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia (Cheltenham: Elgar).

Dent

C. M.

(2012) ‘Regional leadership in East Asia: Japan and China as contenders’, in Beeson

and Stubbs

(eds), The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (London: Routledge), 263–274.

Ferdinand

(2013) ‘Foreign policy convergence in Pacific Asia: The evidence from voting in the UN General Assembly’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12019.

Goh

(2008) ‘Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia’, International Security, 32:3, 113–157.

Goh

(2011) ‘How Japan matters in the evolving East Asian security order’, International Affairs, 87:4, 887–902.

Hix

Noury

and Roland

(2005) ‘Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001’, British Journal of Political Science, 35:2, 209–234.

Luif

(2003) EU Cohesion in the UN General Assembly (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies).

Marín-Bosch

(1987) ‘How nations vote in the General Assembly of the United Nations’, International Organization, 41:4, 705–724.

10.

Stavridis

and Pruett

(1996) EPC at the UN: A Critical Assessment of the Voting Behaviour of European States at the UN's General Assembly between 1970 and 1992 (Reading: University of Reading Department of Politics).

11.

Strezhnev

and Voeten

(2012) ‘United Nations General Assembly voting data: August 2012’, Available online at: https://hdl-handle-net.web.bisu.edu.cn/1902.1712379 (accessed 10 August 2012).

12.

Ströomvik

(1998) ‘Fifteen votes and one voice? The CFSP and changing voting alignments in the UN’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 101:2, 181–197.

13.

Voeten

(2000) ‘Clashes in the assembly’, International Organization, 54:2, 185–215.

14.

Voeten

(2004) ‘Resisting the lonely superpower: Responses of states in the United Nations to U.S. dominance’, The Journal of Politics, 66:3, 729–754.

15.

Voeten

and Merdzanovic

(2009) ‘United Nations General Assembly voting data: Initial version’, Available online at: https://hdl-handle-net.web.bisu.edu.cn/1902.1/12379 (accessed 16 May 2013).

16.

Weatherbee

D. E.

(2009) International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

17.

Young

and Rees

(2005) ‘EU voting behaviour in the UN General Assembly, 1990–2002: The EU's europeanising’, Irish Studies in International Affairs, 16, 193–207.

The Unsolved Puzzle: Pacific Asia's Voting Cohesion in the United Nations General Assembly—A Response to Peter Ferdinand

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References