Situation-Behavior Profiles as a Locus of Consistency in Personality

Abstract

Traditional approaches have long considered situations as “noise” or “error” that obscures the consistency of personality and its invariance. Therefore, it has been customary to average the individual's behavior on any given dimension (e.g., conscientiousness) across different situations. Contradicting this assumption and practice, recent studies have demonstrated that by incorporating the situation into the search for consistency, a new locus of stability is found. Namely, people are characterized not only by stable individual differences in their overall levels of behavior, but also by distinctive and stable patterns of situation-behavior relations (e.g., she does X when A but Y when B). These if … then … profiles constitute behavioral “signatures” that provide potential windows into the individual's underlying dynamics. Processing models that can account for such signatures provide a new route for studying personality types in terms of their shared dynamics and characteristic defining profiles.

Keywords

personality consistency interactionism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayduk

Downey

Testa

Yen

Shoda

(1999). Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection-sensitive women? Social Cognition, 17, 245–271.

Bem

D.J.

Allen

(1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.

Chiu

Hong

Mischel

Shoda

(1995). Discriminative facility in social competence: Conditional versus dispositional encoding and monitoring-blunting of information. Social Cognition, 13, 49–70.

Downey

Feldman

(1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.

Hinton

G.E.

McClelland

J.L.

Rumelhart

D.E.

(1986). Distributed representations. In Rumelhart

D.E.

McClelland

J.L.

(Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the micro-structures of cognition, Vol. I: Foundations (pp. 77–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

Mendoza-Denton

Shoda

Ayduk

Mischel

(1999). Applying cognitive-affective processing system theory to cultural differences in social behavior. In Lonner

W.L.

Dinnel

D.L.

Forgays

D.K.

Hayes

S.A.

(Eds.), Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology: Selected proceedings from the 14th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 205–217). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Mischel

(1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

Mischel

Peake

P.K.

(1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730–755.

Mischel

Shoda

(1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

10.

Morf

Rhodewalt

(2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry., 12, 177–196.

11.

Shoda

Mischel

Wright

J.C.

(1994). Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1023–1035.

12.

Shoda

Tiernan

(in press). Searching for order within a person's stream of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors over time and across situations. In Cervone

Mischel

(Eds.), Advances in personality science (Vol. 1). New York: Guilford.

13.

Vansteelandt

Van

Mec

helen

(1998). Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: A triple typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 751–765.