Only in 1979, 1997 and 2001 have British general elections coincided with the annual local government elections. Uniquely, this study uses both survey and aggregate data to examine aspects of split-ticket voting at the simultaneous elections in 1979 and 1997. Through the use of bi- and multi-variate analysis, it suggests that ticket-splitting is a product of both voter attitudes and party strategies: although it is almost wholly confined to the less partisan, the electoral context in which those votes are being cast can play an additional and significant role in stimulating such behaviour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezR. M.NaglerJ. (2000) ‘A New Approach to Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 30 (1), 57–75.
2.
BaraJ.BudgeI. (2001) ‘Party Policy and Ideology: Still New Labour?’, in NorrisP. (ed.), Britain Votes 2001.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–42.
3.
BartleJ. (1999) ‘Improving the Measurement of Party Identification in Britain’, in FisherJ.CowleyP.DenverD.RussellA. (eds), British Elections and Parties Review 9.London: Frank Cass, pp. 119–35.
4.
BeckP.BaumL.ClausenA. R.SmithC. E. (1992) ‘Patterns and Sources of Ticket-Splitting in Subpresidential Elections’, American Political Science Review, 86 (4), 916–28.
5.
BryninM.SandersD. (1997) ‘Party Identification, Political Preferences and Material Conditions’, Party Politics, 3 (1), 53–77.
6.
BurdenB.KimballD. (1998) ‘A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting’, American Political Science Review, 92 (3), 533–44.
7.
CampbellA.MillerW. (1957) ‘The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split-Ticket Voting’, American Political Science Review, 51 (2), 293–312.
8.
CreweI.ThomsonK. (1999) ‘Party Loyalties: Dealignment or Realignment?’, in EvansG.NorrisP. (eds), Critical Elections.London: Sage, pp. 64–86.
9.
DenverD.HandsG. (1997) Modern Constituency Electioneering.London: Frank Cass.
10.
DeVriesW.TarranceL. (1972) The Ticket Splitter: A New Force in American Politics.Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans.
11.
EvansG.CurticeJ.NorrisP. (1998) ‘New Labour, New Tactical Voting?’, in DenverD.FisherJ.CowleyP.PattieC. (eds), British Elections and Parties Review 8.London: Frank Cass, pp. 65–79.
12.
FiorinaM. (1988) ‘The Reagan Years: Turning to the Right or Groping towards the Middle?’, in CopperB.KornbergA.MishlerW. (eds), The Resurgence of Conservatism in the Anglo-American Democracies.Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 430–60.
13.
GitelsonA.RichardP. (1983) ‘Ticket-Splitting: Aggregate Measures vs. Actual Ballots’, Western Political Quarterly, 36 (3) 410–19.
14.
JacobsonG. (1990) The Electoral Origins of Divided Government.New York: Longman.
15.
JacobsonG. (1997) The Politics of Congressional Elections.Boulder CO: Westview Press.
16.
JohnstonR.PattieC. (1991) ‘Tactical Voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: An Alternative Approach’, British Journal of Political Science, 21 (1), 95–128.
17.
JohnstonR.PattieC. (1999) ‘Constituency Campaign Intensity and Split Ticket Voting: New Zealand's First Election under MMP, 1996’, Political Science, 51 (2), 164–81.
18.
KarpJ.VowlesJ.BanducciS.DonovanT. (2002) ‘Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand's New Mixed System’, Electoral Studies, 21 (1), 1–22.
19.
KimballD.BurdenB. (1998) ‘Seeing the Forest from the Trees: Explaining Split-Ticket Voting within Districts and States’. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston MA.
20.
LaverM. (1998) ‘Party Policy in Britain 1997: Results from an Expert Survey’, Political Studies, 46 (2), 336–47.
21.
McAllisterI.DarcyR. (1992) ‘Sources of Split-Ticket Voting in the 1988 American Elections’, Political Studies, 40 (4), 695–712.
22.
MillerW. (1988) Irrelevant Elections?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
PattieC.JohnstonR.FieldhouseE. (1995) ‘Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983–92’, American Political Science Review89 (4), 969–86.
24.
PetrocikJ. (1991) ‘Divided Government: Is It All in the Campaigns?’ in CoxG.KernellS. (eds), The Politics of Divided Government.Boulder CO: Westview Press, pp. 13–38.
25.
PetrocikJ.DohertyJ. (1996) ‘The Road to Divided Government: Paved without Intention’, in GaldersiP. (ed.), Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty and the Constitutional Order.Lanham MD: Rowmian and Littlefield, pp. 85–107.
26.
RallingsC.ThrasherM. (1998) ‘Split-Ticket Voting at the 1997 British General and Local Elections: An Aggregate Analysis’, in DenverD.FisherJ.CowleyP.PattieC. (eds), British Elections and Parties Review 8.London: Frank Cass, pp. 111–34.
27.
RallingsC.ThrasherM. (2001) ‘Measuring the Level and Direction of Split-Ticket Voting at the 1979 and 1997 British General and Local Elections: A Survey Based Analysis’, Political Studies, 49 (2), 323–30.
28.
SossJ.CanonD. (1995) ‘Partisan Divisions and Voting Decisions: U.S. Senators, Governors, and the Rise of a Divided Federal Government’, Political Research Quarterly, 48 (2), 253–74.
29.
TaylorB.ThomsonK (1999) ‘Technical Appendix’, in EvansG.NorrisP. (eds), Critical Elections.London: Sage, pp. 272–83.
30.
WattenbergM. (1991) The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
