While most research has focused on the executive in Northern Ireland, this study examines behavioural dynamics in the legislative assembly by focusing sharply on division votes and the use of procedural mechanisms in the four sessions from 2007 to 2011. By assessing patterns of coalition configurations and employing Poole's ‘Optimal Classification’ method for examining dimensionality on division votes, the analysis explores the basis for the relative consensus and conflict that have marked legislative behaviour in the most recent attempt at power sharing. This research uncovers two essential dimensions to legislative behaviour: a cross-community dimension that diminished over time in advance of the 2011 election, and a more traditional left–right and nationalist–unionist divide. The study accentuates, however, that unionist and nationalist parties do not vote consistently as cohesive, monolithic blocs. The empirical analysis further shows that use of the ‘minority veto’ was sparing and reserved largely for the most controversial issues of importance to each community.
GuelkeA. G. (2001) ‘International Dimensions of the Belfast Agreement’, in WilfordR. (ed.), Aspects of the Belfast Agreement.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–63.
17.
HalpernS. M. (1986) ‘The Disorderly Universe of Consociational Democracy’, West European Politics, 9 (2), 181–97.
18.
HixS.NouryA. (2010) ‘Scaling the Commons: Using MPs' Left–Right Self-Placement and Voting Divisions to Map the British Parliament, 1997–2005’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, 2–5 September.
19.
HorowitzD. L. (2002) ‘Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes’, in ReynoldsA. (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–36.
20.
KissaneB. (2006) ‘Power-Sharing as a Form of Democracy for Northern Ireland’, Review of Politics, 68 (4), 663–74.
21.
LijphartA. (1969) ‘Consociational Democracy’, World Politics, 21 (2), 207–25.
22.
LijphartA. (1975) ‘The Northern Ireland Problem: Cases, Theories, and Solutions’, British Journal of Political Science, 5 (1), 83–106.
23.
LijphartA. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies.New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
24.
LijphartA. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries.New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
25.
LijphartA. (1985) Power-Sharing in South Africa.Berkeley CA: Institute of International Affairs.
26.
LijphartA. (1989) ‘Democratic Political Systems: Types, Cases, Causes, and Consequences’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1 (1), 33–48.
27.
LijphartA. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Democracies.New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
28.
LijphartA. (2004) ‘Constitutional Design for Divided Societies’, Journal of Democracy, 15 (2), 96–109.
29.
LustickI. (1979) ‘Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control’, World Politics, 31 (3), 325–44.
30.
McAdamN. (2007a) ‘SF Ventures into Ulster-Scots as Motion to Limit Irish is Defeated’, Belfast Telegraph, 10 October.
31.
McAdamN. (2007b) ‘Unionists may Try to Block Irish Act Going to Commons’, Belfast Telegraph, 11 October.
32.
McAdamN. (2009a) ‘SDLP Concern at North South Body Vote’, Belfast Telegraph, 9 February.
33.
McAdamN. (2009b) ‘DUP's Victims Move to Spark Fresh Clash with Sinn Fein’, Belfast Telegraph, 15 September.
McGarryJ.O'LearyB. (2006) ‘Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland's Conflict, and Its Agreement. Part 1: What Consociationalists can Learn from Northern Ireland’, Government and Opposition, 41 (1), 43–63.
MurphyB. (2010) ‘Community Takes Control of Former Forkhill Army Base’, The Examiner, 19 October. Available from: http://www.crossexaminer.co.uk/archives/5078 [Accessed 12 December 2011].
39.
O'FlynnI. (2009) ‘Progressive Integration (and Accommodation, Too)’, in TaylorR. (ed.), Consociational Theory: McGarry and O'Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict.New York: Routledge, pp. 264–78.
40.
O'LearyB. (1989) ‘The Limits to Coercive Consociationalism in Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 37 (4), 562–87.
41.
O'LearyB. (1997) ‘The Conservative Stewardship of Northern Ireland 1979–97: Sound-Bottomed Contradictions or Slow Learning’, Political Studies, 45 (4), 663–76.
42.
O'LearyB. (1998) ‘The British–Irish Agreement: Power-Sharing Plus’, The Constitution Unit, School of Public Policy, London School of Economics.
43.
O'LearyC.ElliotS.WilfordR. (1988) The Northern Ireland Assembly, 1982–86: A Constitutional Experiment.London: Hurst.
44.
PappalardoA. (1981) ‘The Conditions for Consociational Democracy: A Logical and Empirical Critique’, European Journal of Political Research, 9 (4), 365–90.
PooleK. T. (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting.New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RoseR. (1971) Governing without Consensus: An Irish Perspective.London: Faber and Faber.
48.
RuaneJ.ToddJ. (2001) ‘The Politics of Transition? Explaining Political Crises in the Implementation of the Belfast Good Friday Agreement’, Political Studies, 49 (5), 923–40.
Sinn Féin (2008) ‘Attempt to Block Funding for Re-development of Forkhill Barracks Site will be Thwarted by Sinn Féin’. Available from: http://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/12132 [Accessed 12 December 2011].
51.
SpirlingA.McLeanI. (2007) ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the UK House of Commons’, Political Analysis, 15 (1), 85–96.
52.
TaylorR. (1992) ‘South Africa: A Consociational Path to Peace?’, Transformation, 17, 1–11.
53.
TongeJ. (2000) ‘From Sunningdale to the Good Friday Agreement: Creating Devolved Government in Northern Ireland’, Contemporary British History, 14 (3), 39–60.
