This article develops an assessment of the shift from government to governance from the perspective of the concept of democratic representation developed by the French political theorist Claude Lefort. It is argued that this shift does not primarily entail a change of actors, norms or decision-making processes, but that it should rather be understood more fundamentally as a symbolic mutation. In governance regimes, a novel representation of power and society comes into being which transforms the basic symbolic configuration of society. Focusing especially on forms of global governance, the article investigates how this mutation provides society with a new image of itself, and how it affects the democratic nature of current society.
AnkersmitF. R. (1997) Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
BäckstrandK. (2006) ‘Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development’, European Journal of International Relations, 12 (4), 467–98.
3.
BellamyR. and PalumboA. (eds) (2010) From Government to Governance. Farnham: Ashgate.
4.
BenzA. and PapadopoulosI. (eds) (2006) Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. London: Routledge.
5.
BevirM. (2004) ‘Governance and Interpretation: What are the Implications of Postfoundationalism?’, Public Administration, 82 (3), 605–25.
6.
BexellM. (2013) ‘Hand in Hand? UN—Business Cooperation for Health and Development’, Innovation, 26 (3), 201–13.
7.
Bonnafous-BoucherM. (2005) ‘From Government to Governance’, Ethical Perspectives, 12 (4), 521–34.
8.
CohenJ. and SabelC. (1997) ‘Direcly-Deliberative Polyarchy’, European Law Journal, 3 (4), 313–42.
De AngelisM. (2003) ‘Neoliberal Governance, Reproduction and Accumulation’, The Commoner, Spring/Summer, 7. Available from: http://www.commoner.org.uk/07deangelis.pdf [Accessed 19 April 2013].
11.
DeCanioS. (2008) ‘Murray Edelman on Symbols and Ideology in Democratic Politics’, Critical Review, 17 (3–4), 339–50.
12.
DingwerthK. and PattbergP. (2006) ‘Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics’, Global Governance, 12, 185–203.
13.
DryzekJ. (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
EdelmanM. (1985) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
15.
FlynnB. (2005) The Philosophy of Claude Lefort: Interpreting the Political. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
16.
FoucaultM. (2004) Sécurité, Territoire, Population: Cours au Collège de France, 1977–1987. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.
17.
HabermasJ. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
HachezN. and WoutersJ. (2011) ‘A Glimpse at the Democratic Legitimacy of Private Standards: Assessing the Public Accountability of GlobalG.A.P’, Journal of International Economic Law, 14, 677–710.
19.
HeereW. P. (ed.) (2004) From Government to Governance: The Growing Impact of Non-State Actors on the International and European Legal System. The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press.
20.
HéritierA. and LehmkuhlD. (2008) ‘The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance’, Journal of Public Policy, 28, 1–17.
21.
HirschmanA. O. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
JessopB. (1998) ‘The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development’, International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 29–45.
23.
JoergesC. and NeyerJ. (1997) ‘Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving: European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (4), 609–25.
24.
JönssonC. (2012) ‘Global Solutions? Searching for Democratic Approaches to a New World Order’, in van BeekU. J. and Wnuk-LipinskiE. (eds), Democracy under Stress: The Global Crisis and beyond. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich, pp. 173–86.
25.
JordanA.WurzelR. K. W. and AnthonyZ. (2005) ‘The Rise of “New” Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?’, Political Studies, 53 (3), 477–96.
26.
KoppellJ. G. S. (2010) World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy and the Design of Global Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
LefortC. (1963) ‘Démocratie Réelle et Représentation Démocratique’, Cahiers du Centre d'Études Socialistes, February, 22–7.
28.
LefortC. (1986a) Le Travail de l'Oeuvre: Machiavel. Paris: Gallimard.
29.
LefortC. (1986b) The Political Forms of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
LefortC. (1988) Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
LefortC. (1999) Complications: Communism and the Dilemmas of Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
LefortC. (2007) Le Temps présent: Écrits. Paris: Belin.
33.
LefortC. and GauchetM. (1971) ‘Sur la démocratie: le politique et l'institution du social’, Textures, 3 (2–3), 1–78.
34.
LeninW. I. (2009) State and Revolution. Washington, DC: Gateway Editions.
LievensM. (2014) ‘Contesting Representation: Jacques Rancière on Democracy and Representative Government’, Thesis Eleven, 122 (1), 3–17.
37.
MairP. (2006) ‘Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy’, New Left Review, 42, 25–51.
38.
MarchartO. (2007) Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
39.
MarxK. (1978) The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W.W. Norton.
40.
MayntzR. (2004) ‘Governance im modernen Staat’, in BenzA. (ed.), Governance – Regieren in Komplexen Regelsystemen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 65–76.
41.
MouffeC. (2005) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
42.
MouffeC. (2006) On the Political. London: Routledge.
43.
NäsströmS. (2011) ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, 59, 116–34.
44.
NässtrumS. (2006) ‘Representative Democracy as Tautology: Ankersmit and Lefort on Representation’, European Journal of Political Theory, 5 (3), 321–42.
45.
NegriA. and HardtM. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
NegriA. and HardtM. (2009) Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
47.
NietzscheF. (2008) Political Writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
OffeC. (2009) ‘Governance: An “Empty Signifier?’, Constellations, 16 (4), 550–62.
49.
PlotkeD. (1997) ‘Representation is Democracy’, Constellations, 4 (1), 19–34.
50.
RancièreJ. (1999) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
RhodesR. A. W. (1996) ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies, 44 (4), 652–67.
52.
RisseT. (2004) Transnational Governance and Legitimacy. Berlin: Centre for Transatlantic, Foreign and Security Policy Studies.
53.
RisseT. (2007) ‘Regieren in Räumen Begrenzter Staatlichkeit. Zur ‘Reisefähigkeit’ Des Governance-Konzeptes’, SFB-Governance Working Paper 5. Berlin: Free University of Berlin.
54.
RosenauJ. N. (1992) ‘Governance, Order and Change in World Politics’, in RosenauJ. N. and CzempielE. O. (eds), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–29.
55.
RummensS. (2012) ‘Staging Deliberation: The Role of Representative Institutions in the Deliberative Democratic Process’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 20 (1), 23–44.
56.
SawardM. (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchmittC. (1985) ‘Das Problem der innerpolitischen Neutralität des Staates’, (1930) in SchmittC. (ed.), Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren, 1924–1954. Materialen zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 41–62.
58.
SchmittC. (1996) The Concept of the Political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
SingerB.C.J. (2013) ‘Democracy beyond the Political: Reconsidering the Social’, in PlotM. (ed.), Claude Lefort: Thinker of the Political. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 186–202.
60.
StokerG. (1998) ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Science Journal, 155, 17–28.
61.
SundströmG.SonerydL. and FurustenS. (eds) (2010) Organizing Democracy: The Construction of Agency in Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
62.
WarrenM. E. (2011) ‘Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory’, American Political Science Review, 105 (4), 683–701.
63.
WeissT. G. (2000) ‘Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges’, Third World Quarterly, 21 (5), 795–814.
64.
WeissT. G. (2012) What's Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.
65.
WilliamsonO. E. (1983) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications – A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.
