One-Shot Party Primaries: The Case of the Romanian Social Democrats

Abstract

While party primaries for candidate selection gain gradual popularity in established European democracies, they remain rare in Eastern Europe. This article focuses on the Romanian Social Democrats and investigates the reasons why primaries were abandoned after one use. The central argument is that this short lifespan was determined by the absence of relevant short-term benefits. A few pathologies of the primaries led to their failure: contest administration, primary regulations and high costs. The key findings are that party primaries did not produce the intended consequences when implementation was accompanied by centralised decision-making.

Keywords

party primaries centralisation Romania democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adevarul (2004), ‘Liderii PSD se simt amenintati de alegerile preliminare’ (‘The PSD Leaders Feel Threatened by the Primary Elections’), Adevarul, 3 August.

Balasescu

(2004), ‘Dezamagiri si reprosuri la alegerile preliminare din PSD Olt’ (‘Disappointment and Reproaches at the Primary Elections in the PSD Olt’), Gazeta de Sud, 6 September.

Barnea

Rahat

(2007), ‘Reforming Candidate Selection Methods: A Three-Level Approach’, Party Politics 13(3), pp. 375–394.

Best

Cotta

(eds.) (2000), Parliamentary Representatives in Europe, 1848–2000: Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bielasiak

(1997), ‘Substance and Process in the Development of Party Systems of East Central Europe’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(1), pp. 23–44.

Biezen

(2003), Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carey

J.M.

Polga-Hecimovich

(2006), ‘Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America’, Journal of Politics 68(3), pp. 530–543.

Carty

R.K.

Blake

D.E.

(1999), ‘The Adoption of Membership Votes for Choosing Party Leaders: The Experience of Canadian Parties’, Party Politics 5(2), pp. 211–224.

Ciornei

(2004), ‘Candidatii n-au voie sa cheltuiasca nimic la preliminarii’ (‘Candidates are Not Allowed to Spend Anything for the Primaries’), Cotidianul, 10 August.

10.

Cross

(1996), ‘Direct Election of Provincial Party Leaders in Canada, 1985–1995: The End of the Leadership Convention?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 29(2), pp. 295–315.

11.

Curierul National (2004), ‘Si senatorii PSD critica sistemul alegerilor preliminare din partid’ (‘The PSD Senators also Criticise the Primary Election System’), Curierul National, 3 September.

12.

Deegan-Krause

(2006), Elected Affinities: Democracy and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

13.

Dickson

B.J.

Rublee

M.R.

(2000), ‘Membership has Its Privileges’, Comparative Political Studies 33(1), pp. 87–112.

14.

Dragotescu

(2004), ‘Alegerile interne ale PSD-ului: O mascarada’ (‘The Primary Elections in PSD: A Masquerade’), Adevarul, 6 September.

15.

Evenimentul regional al Moldovei (2004), ‘PSD Botosani se pregateste de alegeri interne’ (‘PSD Botosani Gets Ready for Primary Elections’), Evenimentul regional al Moldovei, 2 August.

16.

Gallagher

Marsh

(eds.) (1988), Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics, London: Sage.

17.

Georgescu

(2012), ‘USL cheama alegatorii sa-i trieze candidatii’ (‘USL Asks Voters to Select Its Candidates’). Available from: www.adevarul.ro/actualitate/politica/USL_cheama_alegatorii_sa-i_trieze_candidatii_0_624538096.html# [Accessed 22 February 2012].

18.

Geser

(1999), ‘The Local Party as an Object of Interdisciplinary Comparative Study: Some Steps toward Theoretical Integration’ in Saiz

Geser

(eds.), Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

19.

Gherghina

(2012), ‘Explaining Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: A Party Organizational Approach’, unpublished PhD thesis, Leiden University.

20.

Gherghina

Chiru

(2011), ‘Generating Dissent: Party Cohesion and Voting Loyalty in Romania Following the Electoral Change’, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, St Gallen, 12–17 April.

21.

Gherghina

Chiru

Casal Bertoa

(2011), ‘State Resources and Pocket Money: Shortcuts for Party Funding in Romania’, DISC Working Paper 13/2011, CEU Budapest.

22.

Harmel

Janda

(1982), Parties and Their Environments: Limits to Reform, New York: Longman.

23.

Harmel

Janda

(1994), ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3), pp. 256–287.

24.

Hazan

R.Y.

(1997), ‘The 1996 Intra-party Elections in Israel: Adopting Party Primaries’, Electoral Studies 16(1), pp. 95–102.

25.

Hazan

R.Y.

Rahat

(2010), Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26.

Hofnung

(1996), ‘Public Financing, Party Membership and Internal Party Competition’, European Journal of Political Research 29(1), pp. 73–86.

27.

Hopkin

(2001), ‘Bringing the Members Back In? Democratizing Candidate Selection in Britain and Spain’, Party Politics 7(3), pp. 343–361.

28.

Hotnews (2004), ‘Nastase a admis ca va modifica listele’ ‘(Nastase Admitted that He Will Change the Lists’), Hotnews, 7 September.

29.

Ignazi

Farrell

D.M.

Römmele

(2005), ‘The Prevalence of Linkage by Reward in Contemporary Parties’ in Römmele

Farrell

D.M.

Ignazi

(eds.), Political Parties and Political Systems: The Concept of Linkage Revisited, Westport CT: Praeger, pp. 17–35.

30.

Isaila

(2005), ‘La alegerile interne din 2004, PSD-istii s-au furat intre ei’ (‘At the 2004 Primary Elections, the PSD Members Stole Each Other’), Evenimentul Zilei, 21 June.

31.

Ishiyama

J.T.

(1999), ‘The Communist Successor Parties and Party Organizational Development in Post-Communist Politics’, Political Research Quarterly 52(1), pp. 87–112.

32.

Janda

(1980), Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey, New York: Free Press.

33.

Katz

R.S.

(2001), ‘The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy’, Party Politics 7(3), pp. 277–280.

34.

Katz

R.S.

Mair

(1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics 1(1), pp. 5–29.

35.

LeDuc

(2001), ‘Democratizing Party Leadership Selection’, Party Politics 7(3), pp. 323–341.

36.

Lewis

P.G.

(ed.) (1996), Party Structure and Organization in East Central Europe, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

37.

Lewis

P.G.

(2001), Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe, New York: Routledge.

38.

Madarasan

(2004), ‘Fostul ministru Alexandru Lapusan a demisionat din PSD’ (‘The Former Minister Alexandru Lapusan Resigned from the PSD’), Amos News, 10 October.

39.

Norris

(1996), ‘Legislative Recruitment’ in LeDuc

Niemi

R.G.

Norris

(eds.), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, London: Sage, pp. 184–215.

40.

Norris

(ed.) (1997), Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Norton

Olson

D.M.

(eds.) (1996), The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe, New York: Routledge.

42.

Onofrei

(2004), ‘A intrat dihonia in PSD’ (‘PSD Starts Quarrelling’), Ziarul de Iasi. Available from: http://www.ziaruldeiasi.ro/local/iasi/a-intrat-dihonia-in-psd∼ni3gf4 [Accessed 4 March 2012].

43.

Pennings

Hazan

(2001), ‘Democratizing Candidate Selection: Causes and Consequences’, Party Politics 7(3), pp. 267–275.

44.

Polsby

N.W.

(1960), ‘Decision-Making at the National Conventions’, Western Political Quarterly 13(3), pp. 609–619.

45.

Rahat

Hazan

(2001), ‘Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework’, Party Politics 7(3), pp. 297–322.

46.

Rahat

Hazan

(2007), ‘Participation in Party Primaries: Increase in Quantity, Decrease in Quality’ in Zittel

Fuchs

(eds.), Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Citizens Back In?, New York: Routledge, pp. 57–72.

47.

Rose

(1995), ‘Mobilizing Demobilized Voters in Post-Communist Societies’, Party Politics 1(4), pp. 549–563.

48.

Sartori

(1976), Political Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

49.

Scarrow

(2000), ‘Parties without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment’ in Dalton

R.J.

Wattenberg

(eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–101.

50.

Schattschneider

E.E.

(1942), Political Parties, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

51.

Seligman

L.G.

King

M.R.

Kim

C.L.

Smith

R.E.

(1974), Patterns of Recruitment: A State Chooses Its Lawmakers, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

52.

Serra

(2011), ‘Why Primaries? The Party's Tradeoff between Policy and Valence’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 23(1), pp. 21–51.

53.

Siclitaru

(2004), ‘Electorii PSD au votat dupa cum le-au “dictat” sefii de zone’ (‘The PSD Members Voted According to the “Orders” of the Local Leaders’), Ziua de Constanta, 7 September.

54.

Szczerbiak

(2006), ‘Power without Love? Patterns of Party Politics in Post–1989 Poland’ in Jungerstam-Mulders

(ed.), Post-Communist EU Member States Parties and Party Systems, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 91–124.

55.

Ware

(2002), The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

56.

Weldon

(2006), ‘Downsize My Polity? The Impact of Size on Party Membership and Member Activism’, Party Politics 12(4), pp. 467–481.

57.

Zamfiroiu

(2002), ‘La jumatatea mandatului, PSD se pregateste pentru alegeri’ (‘Half Way through the Term in Office, the PSD Gets Ready for Elections’), Ziarul Financiar, 12 October.