Semantic Competition as The Basis of Stroop Interference: Evidence From Color-Word Matching Tasks

Abstract

A color-word matching task was used to investigate the basis of Stroop interference. Subjects were shown a pair of stimuli: an ink color (e.g., a red bar) and a colored word (e.g., RED printed in red or blue) and decided whether the two items had the same meaning (meaning decisions) or whether they had the same surface color (visual decisions). In Experiment 1, the two stimuli were shown simultaneously, and conflicting visual information of the word (e.g., RED printed in blue, against a red bar) led to interference in meaning decisions, whereas conflicting verbal information (e.g., BLUE printed in red, against a red bar) produced no interference in visual decisions. In Experiment 2, as an increasing time interval was imposed between presentation of the color bar and the colored word, interference in meaning decisions diminished, whereas interference in visual decisions was established. These results suggest that semantic competition, not response competition, is the major source of Stroop and Stroop-like interference.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cattell

J.M.

(1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.

Dalrymple-Alford

E.C.

(1972). Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 274–276.

Dyer

F.N.

(1973). Same and different judgments for word-color pairs with “irrelevant” words or colors: Evidence for word-code comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 102–108.

Egeth

H.E.

Blecker

D.L.

Kamlet

A.S.

(1969). Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 355–356.

Flowers

J.H.

(1975). “Sensory” interference in a word-color matching task. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 37–43.

Glaser

W.R.

Glaser

M.O.

(1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42.

Klein

G.S.

(1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576–578.

Klopfer

D.S.

(1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150–157.

LaBerge

Samuels

S.J.

(1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

10.

MacLeod

C.M.

(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

11.

Morton

Chambers

S.M.

(1973). Selective attention to words and colours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387–397.

12.

Posner

M.I.

Boies

S.J.

Eichelman

W.H.

Taylor

R.L.

(1969). Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 79, 1–13.

13.

Posner

M.I.

Snyder

C.R.R.

(1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso

R.L.

, (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Proctor

R.W.

(1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 413–419.

15.

Scheibe

Shaver

P.R.

Carrier

S.C.

(1967). Color association values and response interference on variants of the Stroop test. Acta Psychologica, 26, 286–295.

16.

Seymour

P.H.

(1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 245–265.

17.

Shiffrin

R.M.

Schneider

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

18.

Snodgrass

J.G.

(1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 3–22.

19.

Stirling

(1979). Stroop interference: An input and an output phenomenon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 121–132.

20.

Stroop

J.R.

(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

21.

Theios

Amrhein

P.C.

(1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review, 96, 5–24.

22.

Virzi

R.A.

Egeth

H.E.

(1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304–319.