The distinction between relatively independent versus interdependent self-construals has been strongly associated with several important cultural differences in social behavior. The current studies examined the causal role of self-construal by investigating whether priming independent or interdependent self-construals within a culture could result in differences in psychological worldview that mirror those traditionally found between cultures. In Experiment 1, European-American participants primed with interdependence displayed shifts toward more collectivist social values and judgments that were mediated by corresponding shifts in self-construal. In Experiment 2, this effect was extended by priming students from the United States and Hong Kong with primes that were consistent and inconsistent with their predominant cultural worldview. Students who received the inconsistent primes were more strongly affected than those who received the consistent primes, and thus shifted self-construal, and corresponding values, to a greater degree.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
2.
BaumeisterR.F.LearyM.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
3.
BetancourtH.LopezS.R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629–637.
4.
BrewerM.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
5.
BrewerM.B.GardnerW.L. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.
6.
BrownD.E. (1991). Human universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7.
FiskeA.P.KitayamaS.MarkusH.R.NisbettR.E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In GilbertD.FiskeS., (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
8.
GardnerW.L.GabrielS. (1998a). “One for all”: Interdependence priming affects group-oriented behavior in a resource dilemma. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
9.
GardnerW.L.GabrielS. (1998b). When we are “we,” you are not threatening: The effect of interdependence priming on self-evaluation maintenance. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
10.
HeineS.J.TakataT.LehmanD.R. (1998). Beyond self-presentation: Evidence for self-criticism among the Japanese. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
HongY.ChiuC.KungT.M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. In LeungK.KimU.YamaguchiS.KashimaY., (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 212–223). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
KuhnM.H.McPartlandT. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 69–76.
13.
MarkusH.R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
14.
MarkusH.R.KitayamaS.HeimanR.J. (1997). Culture and basic psychological principles. In HigginsE.T.KruglanskiA.W., (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857–913). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
MillerJ.G.BersoffD.M.HarwoodR.L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 33–47.
16.
MorrisM.W.PodolnyJ.M.ArielS. (1998, October). Integrating ‘subjective culture’ and ‘network structuralist’ approaches to country differences: Sociocultural systems and interpersonal obligation in work organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Lexington, KY.
17.
NisbettR.E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
PengK. (1997). Naive dialecticism and its effects on reasoning and judgment about contradiction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
19.
SchwartzS.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–62). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
SchwederR.A.BourneL. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In SchwederR.A.LevineR.A., (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
SchwederR.A.MuchN.C.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The big three of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the big three explanations of suffering. In BrandtA.RozinP., (Eds.), Moralization (pp. 119–169). New York: Rutledge.
22.
TardifT. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492–504.
23.
TrafimowD.TriandisH.C.GotoS.G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.
24.
TriandisH.C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
25.
TriandisH.C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
TriandisH.C.McCuskerC.HuiH.C. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–1020.
