Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention

Abstract

The relationship between working memory and selective attention has traditionally been discussed as operating in one direction: Attention filters incoming information, allowing only relevant information into short-term processing stores. This study tested the prediction that the contents of visual working memory also influence the guidance of selective attention. Participants held a sample object in working memory on each trial. Two objects, one matching the sample and the other novel, were then presented simultaneously. As measured by a probe task, attention shifted to the object matching the sample. This effect generalized across object type, attentional-probe task, and working memory task. In contrast, a matched task with no memory requirement showed the opposite pattern, demonstrating that this effect is not simply due to exposure to the sample. These results confirm a specific prediction about the influence of working memory contents on the guidance of attention.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

Styles

E.A.

Hsieh

S.L.

(1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umilta

Moscovitch

(Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Awh

Jonides

Reuter-Lorenz

(1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780–790.

Brainard

D.H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443–446.

Chelazzi

Duncan

Miller

E.K.

Desimone

(1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918–2940.

Chelazzi

Miller

E.K.

Duncan

Desimone

(1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345–347.

Christie

Klein

(1995). Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? Memory & Cognition, 23, 547–550.

Christie

Klein

R.M.

(1996). Assessing the evidence for novel popout. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 201–207.

Desimone

(1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 13494–13499.

Desimone

Duncan

(1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.

10.

Duncan

(1998). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, 1307–1317.

11.

Duncan

Humphreys

G.W.

(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.

12.

Folk

C.L.

Remington

(1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727–739.

13.

Folk

C.L.

Remington

R.W.

Johnston

J.C.

(1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.

14.

Folk

C.L.

Remington

R.W.

Johnston

J.C.

(1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 682–685.

15.

Johnston

W.A.

Hawley

K.J.

Farnham

J.M.

(1993). Novel popout: Empirical boundaries and tentative theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 140–153.

16.

Johnston

W.A.

Hawley

K.J.

Plewe

S.H.

Elliott

J.M.G.

DeWitt

M.J.

(1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 397–411.

17.

Kim

M.-S.

Cave

(1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376–380.

18.

Loftus

G.R.

Masson

M.E.J.

(1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.

19.

Miller

E.K.

Desimone

(1994). Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. Science, 263, 520–522.

20.

Miller

E.K.

Erickson

C.A.

Desimone

(1996). Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5154–5167.

21.

Pashler

Shiu

L.-P.

(1999). Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 445–448.

22.

Posner

M.I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

23.

Schneider

Shiffrin

R.M.

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

24.

Shapiro

K.L.

Arnell

K.M.

Raymond

J.E.

(1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296.

25.

Ungerleider

L.G.

Mishkin

(1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle

D.J.

Goodale

M.A.

Mansfield

R.J.W.

(Eds.), The analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

26.

Yantis

(1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676–681.