Visual attention enables observers to extract and process high-priority information in the visual field. Controversy remains as to whether or not observers can ignore information that falls within the spatial beam of attention. We used an objective physiological measure, the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), to investigate this question. A stream of flickering small, uppercase letters was embedded in the center of a stream of large, uppercase letters. A unitary beam would result in no difference of the SSVEP amplitude elicited by the small letter stream when it was attended versus ignored (i.e., when subjects attended the large letter stream). Contrary to this prediction, SSVEP amplitude increased by almost 100% when the small letter stream was attended compared with when it was ignored. The results support the notion that the attentional spotlight can be formed like a doughnut, processing central information differentially depending on whether it is attended or ignored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anllo-VentoL.HillyardS.A.
(1996).
Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection.
Perception & Psychophysics,
58, 191–206.
2.
BarriopedroM.I.BotellaJ.
(1998).
New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique.
Perception & Psychophysics,
60, 1406–1414.
3.
BaylisG.C.DriverJ.
(1993).
Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
19, 451–470.
4.
CastielloU.UmiltaC.
(1992).
Splitting focal attention.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
18, 837–848.
DeaconD.BretonF.RitterW.VaughanH.G.Jr.
(1991).
The relationship between N2 and N400: Scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance.
Psychophysiology,
28, 185–200.
7.
DeVeloisR.L.DeVeloisK.K.
(1988).
Spatial vision.
Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
DuncanJ.
(1984).
Selective attention and the organization of visual information.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
113, 501–517.
9.
EimerM.
(1999).
Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks.
Psychophysiology,
36, 491–503.
10.
EimerM.
(2000).
An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity.
Biological Psychology,
52, 205–220.
11.
EriksenB.A.EriksenC.W.
(1974).
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.
Perception & Psychophysics,
16, 143–149.
12.
EriksenC.W.St. JamesJ.D.
(1986).
Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention.
Perception & Psychophysics,
45, 225–240.
13.
FinkG.R.DolanP.W.HalliganP.W.MarshallJ.C.FrithC.D.
(1997).
Space-based and object-based visual attention: Shared and specific neural domains.
Brain,
120, 2013–2028.
HeinzeH.-J.LuckS.J.MünteT.F.GösA.MangunG.R.HillyardS.A.
(1994).
Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis.
Perception & Psychophysics,
56, 42–52.
16.
HillyardS.A.HinrichsH.TempelmannC.MorganS.T.HansenJ.C.ScheichH.HeinzeH.J.
(1997).
Combining steady-state visual evoked potentials and fMRI to localize brain activity during selective attention.
Human Brain Mapping,
5, 287–292.
17.
HillyardS.A.MangunG.R.WoldorffM.G.LuckS.J.
(1995).
Neural systems mediating selective attention. In
GazzanigaM.S. (Ed.),
The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 665–681).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
HillyardS.A.VogelE.K.LuckS.J.
(1998).
Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B,
353, 1257–1270.
19.
HübnerR.BackerG.
(1999).
Perceiving spatially inseparable objects: Evidence for feature-based object selection not mediated by location.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
25, 1556–1567.
20.
KinchlaR.A.
(1992).
Attention.
Annual Review of Psychology,
43, 711–742.
21.
KramerA.F.HahnS.
(1995).
Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.
Psychological Science,
6, 381–386.
22.
LaBergeD.
(1995).
Attentional processing.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LuckS.J.FordM.A.
(1998).
On the role of selective attention in visual perception.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,
95, 825–830.
MorganS.T.HansenJ.C.HillyardS.A.
(1996).
Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady state visual evoked potential.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,
93, 4770–4774.
26.
MüllerM.M.
(1998).
Oscillatory cortical activities in the human brain. Habilitation thesis, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. Available from the Universität Konstanz Web site: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2000/376/
27.
MüllerM.M.HillyardS.A.
(2000).
Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual spatial selective attention.
Clinical Neurophysiology,
111, 1544–1552.
28.
MüllerM.M.PictonT.W.Valdes-SosaP.RieraP.Teder-SälejärviW.HillyardS.A.
(1998).
Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20–28 Hz range.
Cognitive Brain Research,
6, 249–261.
29.
MüllerM.M.RockstrohB.BergP.WagnerM.ElbertT.MakeigS.
(1994).
SSR-modulation during slow cortical potentials. In
PantevC.ElbertT.LütkenhönerB. (Eds.),
Oscillatory event-related brain dynamics (pp. 325–341).
New York: Plenum Press.
MüllerM.M.Teder-SälejärviW.HillyardS.A.
(1998).
The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention.
Nature Neuroscience,
1, 631–634.
32.
O'CravenK.DowningP.KanwisherN.
(1999).
fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.
Nature,
401, 584–587.
33.
PictonT.W.
(1992).
The P300 wave of the human event-related potential.
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,
9, 456–479.
34.
PosnerI.P.PetersenS.E.
(1990).
The attention system of the human brain.
Annual Review of Neuroscience,
13, 25–42.
35.
PosnerM.I.DehaeneS.
(1994).
Attentional networks.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
17, 75–79.
36.
ReganD.
(1989).
Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine.
New York: Elsevier.
37.
RockstrohB.MüllerM.M.HeinzA.WagnerM.BergP.ElbertT.
(1996).
Modulation of auditory responses during oddball tasks.
Biological Psychology,
43, 41–55.
38.
ShawM.L.
(1978).
A capacity model for reaction time.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
4, 586–598.
39.
ShawM.L.ShawP.
(1977).
Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
3, 201–211.
40.
TipperS.P.WeaverB.
(1998).
The medium of attention: Location based, object centered, or scene based. In
WrightR.D. (Ed.),
Visual attention (pp. 77–107).
New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
VeceraS.P.FarahM.J.
(1994).
Does visual attention select objects or locations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
123, 146–160.
