Williams syndrome (WS) is a rare genetic disorder that results in profound spatial cognitive deficits. We examined whether individuals with WS have intact perception of biological motion, which requires global spatial integration of local motion signals into a unitary percept of a human form. Children with WS, normal mental-age-matched children, and normal adults viewed point-light-walker (PLW) displays portraying a human figure walking to the left or right. Children with WS were as good as or better than control children in their ability to judge the walker's direction, even when it was masked with dynamic noise that mimicked the local motion of the PLW lights. These results show that mechanisms underlying the perception of at least some kinds of biological motion are unimpaired in children with WS. They provide the first evidence of selective sparing of a specialized spatial system in individuals with a known genetic impairment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonT.PuceA.McCarthyG.
(2000).
Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
4, 267–278.
2.
AtkinsonJ.AnkerS.BraddickO.NokesL.MasonA.BraddickF.
(2001).
Visual and visuospatial development in young children with Williams syndrome.
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,
43, 330–337.
3.
AtkinsonJ.KingJ.BraddickO.NokesL.AnkerS.BraddickF.
(1997).
A specific deficit of dorsal stream function in Williams' syndrome.
NeuroReport,
8,
1919–1919.
4.
BeeryK.E.BuktenicaN.A.
(1967).
Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration.
Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
5.
BellugiU.MarksS.BihrleA.SaboH.
(1988).
Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams Syndrome. In
BishopD.MogfordK. (Eds.),
Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 177–189).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BellugiU.SaboH.VaidJ.
(1988).
Spatial deficits in children with Williams Syndrome. In
Stiles-DavisJ.KritchevskyM.BellugiU. (Eds.),
Spatial cognition: Brain bases and development (pp. 273–298).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BellugiU.WangP.P.JerniganT.L.
(1994).
Williams Syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In
BromanS.H.GrafmanJ. (Eds.),
Atypical cognitive deficits in development disorders: Implications for brain function (pp. 23–56).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BertenthalB.I.PintoJ.
(1994).
Global processing of biological motions.
Psychological Science,
5, 221–225.
9.
BertenthalB.I.ProffittD.R.KramerS.J.SpetnerN.B.
(1987).
Infants' encoding of kinetic displays varying in relative coherence.
Developmental Psychology,
23, 171–178.
10.
BihrleA.M.BellugiU.DelisD.MarksS.
(1989).
Seeing either the forest or the trees: Dissociation in visuospatial processing.
Brain and Cognition,
11(1), 37–49.
11.
BondaE.PetridesM.OstryD.EvansA.
(1996).
Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion.
Journal of Neuroscience,
16, 3737–3744.
12.
ChubbC.SperlingG.
(1988).
Drift-balanced random stimuli: A general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A—Optics Image Science and Vision,
5,
1986–1986.
13.
CuttingJ.E.MooreC.MorrisonR.
(1988).
Masking the motions of human gait.
Perception & Psychophysics,
44, 339–347.
14.
DilksD.LandauB.HoffmanJ.E.SiegfriedJ.
(2001, April).
Selective impairment of dorsal stream functions in Williams syndrome? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
15.
DittrichW.H.TrosciankoT.LeaS.MorganD.
(1996).
Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance.
Perception,
25, 727–738.
16.
ElliotC.D.
(1990).
Differential Abilities Scale.
San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
17.
EwartA.K.MorrisC.A.AtkinsonD.JinW.SternesK.SpalloneP.StockA.D.LeppertM.KeatingM.T.
(1993).
Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome.
Nature Genetics,
5(1), 11–16.
18.
FarahM.TanakaJ.DrainH.M.
(1995).
What causes the face inversion effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
21, 628–634.
GreenD.M.SwetsJ.A.
(1966).
Signal detection theory and psychophysics.
New York: Wiley.
22.
HoffmanJ.E.LandauB.
(2000, April).
Spared object recognition with profound spatial deficits: Evidence from children with Williams syndrome. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
23.
HoffmanJ.E.LandauB.PaganiJ.H.
(1998, November).
Eye fixations during block construction in children with Williams syndrome. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Dallas, TX.
24.
IshaiA.UngerleiderL.G.MartinA.SchoutenJ.L.HaxbyJ.V.
(1999).
Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,
96, 9379–9384.
25.
JohanssonG.
(1973).
Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.
Perception & Psychophysics,
14, 201–211.
26.
KaufmanA.S.KaufmanN.L.
(1990).
Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test.
Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
27.
LoweryM.MorrisC.EwartA.BrothmanL.ZhuX.LeonardC.CareyJ.KeatingM.BrothmanA.
(1995).
Strong correlation of elastin deletions, detected by FISH, with Williams-syndrome—evaluation of 235 patients.
American Journal of Human Genetics,
57(1), 49–53.
28.
MatherG.MurdochL.
(1994).
Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B—Biological Sciences,
258, 273–279.
29.
MervisC.B.
(1999).
The Williams Syndrome cognitive profile: Strength, weaknesses, and interrelations among auditory short-term memory, language, and visuospatial constructive cognition. In
WinogradE.FivushR.HirstW. (Eds.),
Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (pp. 193–227).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
MervisC.B.MorrisC.A.BertrandJ.RobinsonB.F.
(1999).
Williams Syndrome: Findings from an integrated program of research. In
Tager-FlusbergH. (Ed.),
Neurodevelopmental disorders: Developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 65–110).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
MilnerA.D.GoodaleM.A.
(1995).
The visual brain in action.
New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
MoscovitchM.WinocurG.BehrmannM.
(1997).
What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
9, 555–604.
33.
OramM.W.PerrettD.I.
(1994).
Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to “biological motion” stimuli.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
6, 99–116.
34.
PaniJ.R.MervisC.B.RobinsonB.F.
(1999).
Global spatial organization by individuals with Williams syndrome.
Psychological Science,
10, 453–458.
SchenkT.ZihlJ.
(1997).
Visual motion perception after brain damage: II. Deficits in form-from-motion perception.
Neuropsychologia,
35, 1299–1310.
37.
Tager-FlusbergH.SullivanK.
(2000).
A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome.
Cognition,
76, 59–89.
38.
UngerleiderL.G.MishkinM.
(1982).
Two cortical visual systems. In
IngleD.J.GoodaleM.A.MansfieldR.J.W. (Eds.),
Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
VainaL.M.LeMayM.BienfangD.C.ChoiA.Y.NakayamaK.
(1990).
Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study.
Visual Neuroscience,
5, 353–369.
40.
WangP.P.DohertyS.RourkeS.B.BellugiU.
(1995).
Unique profile of visuo-perceptual skills in a genetic syndrome.
Brain and Cognition,
29(1), 54–65.
