Reading-disabled children often have accompanying deficits in motor coordination. Rather than assuming impairment of a shared neural mechanism, we conjecture that coordination difficulties that undermine normal speech would also undermine development of phonological awareness, which is necessary for reading fluency. Nonimpaired readers who vary in fluency, therefore, should also covary in coordination. Reliable interrelationships between phonological decoding skills and the speed and variability of sequentially tapping the fingers of one hand (either dominant or nondominant) were, indeed, found for college undergraduates. Reading measures that do not emphasize phonological decoding did not show the same connection. Characterizing phonological decoding as a skill and the long-term consequences of failure to master that skill suggest that it could benefit from practice even in high-literacy populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradyS.A.ShankweilerD.P., (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
CampbellR.BurdenV. (1995). Pre-lingual deafness and literacy: A new look at old ideas. In de GelderB.MoraisJ., (Eds.), Speech and reading (pp. 109–123). East Sussex, England: Erlbaum Taylor & Francis.
4.
CorballisM.C. (1991). The lopsided ape: Evolution of the generative mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
DencklaM.B. (1985). Motor coordination in dyslexic children: Theoretical and clinical implications. In DuffyF.GeshwindN., (Eds.), Dyslexia: A neuroscientific approach to clinical evaluation (pp. 187–196). Boston: Little, Brown.
6.
ElbroC.Borstr⊘mI.PetersenD.K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.
7.
FowlerA. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In BradyS.A.ShankweilerD.P., (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
GreenfieldP.M. (1991). Language, tools, and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 531–595.
LibermanA.M. (1993). In speech perception, timing is not what it seems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 264–271.
12.
LibermanI.Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 23, 65–77.
13.
LibermanI.Y.ShankweilerD.LibermanA.M. (1985). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In ShankweilerD.LibermanI.Y., (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
14.
LukatelaK.CarelloC.ShankweilerD.LibermanI.Y. (1995). Phonological awareness in illiterates. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 463–487.
15.
LundbergI.FrostJ.PetersenO. (1988). Effects of extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
16.
MoraisJ.BertelsonP.CaryL.AlegriaJ. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45–64.
17.
NelsonH.E.O'ConnellA. (1978). Dementia: The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the New Adult Reading Test. Cortex, 14, 234–244.
18.
NicolsonR.I.FawcettA.J. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research?Cognition, 35, 159–182.
19.
NittrouerS. (1996). The relation between speech perception and phoneme awareness: Evidence from low-SES children and children with chronic OM. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1059–1070.
20.
OlsonR.ForsbergH.WiseB.RackJ. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In Reid LyonG., (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
ProvinsK.A. (1997). The specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry: A review of the evidence and its implications. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 183–192.
22.
PughK.R.MenclW.E.ShaywitzB.A.ShaywitzS.E.FulbrightR.K.ConstableR.T.SkudlarskiP.MarchioneK.E.JennerA.R.FletcherJ.M.LibermanA.M.ShankweilerD.P.KatzL.LacadieC.GoreJ.C. (2000). The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: Task-specific differences in functional connectivity within posterior cortex. Psychological Science, 11, 51–56.
23.
ScarboroughH.S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743.
24.
Studdert-KennedyM. (1987). The phoneme as a perceptuo-motor structure. In AllportA.PrinzW.ScheererE., (Eds.), Language perception and production (pp. 67–84). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Studdert-KennedyM. (in press). Deficits in phoneme awareness do not arise from failures in rapid auditory processing. Reading and Writing.
26.
WimmerH.MayringerH.LanderlK. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.
27.
WolfM.BowersP.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.
28.
WolffP.H. (1999). A candidate phenotype for familial dyslexia. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, III/21–III/27.
29.
WolffP.H.MichelG.F.OvrutM. (1990). The timing of syllable repetitions in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 33, 281–289.
30.
WolffP.H.MichelG.F.OvrutM.DrakeC. (1990). Rate and timing precision of motor coordination in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 349–359.
