The standard narrative of the sociology of education accounts for the perpetuation of relative differentials in class access to education by a structure-disposition-practice scheme in which the central explanatory weight is carried by properties of socialized agents. The dominant scheme of this kind is now that inspired by Bourdieu. In this context, it is, therefore, appropriate to interrogate the competence of socialization in sociological explanations of social events and processes. The argument adopts a position of scientific and critical realism, and it is suggested that a realist sociology might find in Bourdieu's approach, notwithstanding specific theoretical and conceptual weaknesses, a framework strong enough to sustain the multilevel explanations of inequality/difference necessary in the sociology of education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJ., (1995), Fin de Siècle: Social Theory Relativism, Reduction and the Problem of Reason, London: Verso.
2.
ArcherM., (1995), Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BarleyN., (1986), The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes from a Mud Hut, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
4.
BellD., (1990), Husserl, London: Routledge.
5.
BernsteinB., (1996), Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique, London: Taylor and Francis.
6.
BhaskarR., (1993), Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom, London: Verso.
7.
BourdieuP.BoltanskiL.CastelR.ChamboredonJ.-C., (1965), Un Art Moyen: Essai sur les Usages Sociaux de la Photographie, duxième édition, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
8.
BourdieuP., (1974), ‘The School as a Conservative Force: Scholastic and Cultural Inequalities’, in EgglestonJ. (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education, trans. WhitehouseJ.C., pp. 32–46, London: Methuen.
9.
BourdieuP., (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. NiceR., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BourdieuP., (1991), Language and Symbolic Power, ed. and introduction ThompsonJ.B., trans. RaymondG.AdamsonM., Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BourdieuP., (1990), In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. AdamsonM., Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
BourdieuP., (1993), Sociology in Question, trans. NiceR., London: Sage.
13.
BourdieuP., (1999), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, trans. by FergusonP. ParkhurstEmanuelS.WarynS.T., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
BourdieuP., (1986), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. NiceR., London: Routledge.
15.
BourdieuP., (1990), In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity.
CrossleyN., (2001), ‘Embodiment and social structure: A response to Howson and Inglis’, The Sociological Review, 49 (3): 318–326.
24.
DavisA.DollardJ., (1940), Children of Bondage: The Personality Development of Negro Youth in the Urban South, Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
25.
DaweA., (1970), ‘The Two Sociologies’, British Journal of Sociology, 21 (2): 207–218.
26.
DeweyC., (1983), Human Nature and Conduct, The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 14, 1922. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
27.
DurkheimE., (1982), The Rules of Sociological Method, and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method, ed. and introduction LukesS., trans. HallsR., New York: Free Press.
28.
DurkheimE.MaussM., (1963 [1903]), Primitive Classification, introduction and trans. NeedhamR., London: Cohen and West.
29.
DaviesB., (1994), ‘Durkheim and the Sociology of Education in Britain’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15 (1): 3–25.
30.
EliasN., (1982), State Formation and Civilization, Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
FowlerB., (1996), ‘An Introduction to Bourdieu's ‘Understanding’, Theory, Culture and Society, 3 (2): 1–16.
32.
FreudS., (ed. by StracheyJ.), (1922), The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Translated by TysonA., New York: Norton.
33.
GrenfellM.JamesD. with HodkinsonP.ReayD.RobbinsD.M., (1998), Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory, London: Falmer Press.
34.
GodelierM., (1986), The Mental and the Material: Thought, Economy and Society, London: Verso.
35.
HarréR., (1997), ‘Forward to Aristotle’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27 (2/3): 173–191.
36.
HarréR.MaddenE.H., (1975), Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
HeideggerM., (1996), Being and Time, trans. StambaughJ., Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
38.
HowsonA.InglisD., (2001), ‘The Body in Society: Tensions Inside and Outside Sociological Thought’, Sociological Review, 49 (3): 297–317.
39.
HusserlE., (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, introduction and trans. CarrD.Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
40.
JamesW., (1976), Habit, Norwood, PA: Norwood.
41.
LaneJ.F., (2000), Pierre Bourdieu: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto.
42.
Lévi-StraussC., (1978), Structural Anthropology, Vols. 1 and 2, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
43.
LiPumaE., (1993), ‘Culture and the Concept of Culture in a Theory of Practice’, in CalhounC.LiPumaE.PostoneM. (eds), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, pp. 14–34, Cambridge: Polity Press.
44.
MargolisJ., (1999), ‘Bourdieu: Habitus and the Logic of Practice’, in ShustermanR. (ed.), Burdieu: A Critical Reader, pp. 64–83, Blackwell: Oxford.
45.
MaussM., (1979), Sociology and Psychology: Essays, trans. BrewsterB., London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
46.
MeadG.H., (1934), Mind, Self and Society, ed. MorrisC.W., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Merleau-PontyM., (1974), ‘From Mauss to Claude Lévi-Strauss’, in Merleau-PontyM.O'NeillJ. (eds.), Phenomenology, Language and Sociology: Selected Essays of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, pp. 111–122, London: Heinemann.
48.
NashR., (1997), Inequality/Difference: A Sociology of Education, Palmerston North: ERDC Press.
49.
NashR., (1999a), ‘What is Real and What is Realism in Sociology?’Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24 (9): 445–466.
50.
NashR., (1999b), ‘Bourdieu, “Habitus”, and Educational Research: Is it all Worth the Candle?’British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20 (2): 175–187.
51.
NashR., (2002), ‘A Realist Framework for the Sociology of Education: Thinking with Bourdieu’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34 (3): 273–288.
52.
ParsonsT., (1954), Essays in Sociological Theory, New York: Free Press.
53.
PorporaD.V., (1989), ‘Four Concepts of Social Structure’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19 (2): 195–211.
54.
ReayD., (1995), ‘“They Employ Cleaners to do that”: Habitus in the Primary School’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16 (3): 353–371.
55.
RobbinsD.M., (1991), The Work of Pierre Bourdieu: Recognising Society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
56.
RobbinsD.M., (1999), ‘Bourdieu on Language and Education: Conjunction or Parallel Development?’, in GrenfellM.KellyM. (eds), Pierre Bourdieu: Language, Culture and Education: Theory into Practice, pp. 313–333, Berne: Peter Lang.
57.
RobbinsD.M., (1998), ‘The Need for an Epistemological Break’, in GrenfellM.JamesD. with HodkinsonP.ReayD.RobbinsD., Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory, pp. 27–51, London: Falmer Press.
58.
RobbinsD.M., (2000a), Bourdieu and Culture, London: Sage.
59.
RobbinsD.M., (2000b), ‘The English Intellectual Field in the 1790s and the Creative Project of Samuel Taylor Coleridge – An Application of Bourdieu's Cultural Analysis’, in FowlerB. (ed.), Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, pp. 186–198, Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
60.
RyleA., (1984), The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
de SaussureF., (1974), Course in General Linguistics, ed. BallyC.SechehayeA., in collaboration with ReidlingerA., introduction by CullerJ., translated by BaskinW., London: Owen.
62.
SayerD., (1979), Marx's Method: Ideology, Science and Critique in Capital, Brighton: Harvester.
63.
SchmausW., (1994), Durkheim's Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge: Creating an Intellectual Niche, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
64.
SchutzA., (1972), The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. WalshG.LehnertF., London: Heinemann Educational Press.
ShillingC., (2001), ‘Embodiment, Experience and Theory: In Defence of the Sociological Tradition’, Sociological Review, 49 (3): 327–344.
67.
ShustermanR., (ed.), (1998), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
68.
SkeggsB., (1997), Foundations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable, London: Sage.
69.
SorokinP., (1998), On the Practice of Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SorokinP.A., (1962), Society, Culture and Personality: Their Structure and Dynamics, New York: Cooper Square Publishing.
71.
TooleyJ.DarbyD., (1998), Educational Research, A Critique: A Survey of Published Results, London: Office of Standards in Education.
72.
WacquantL., (1999), ‘Inside “The Zone”’, in BourdieuP., The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, pp. 140–167, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
73.
WacquantL., (2000), ‘Durkheim and Bourdieu: The Common Plinth and Some of its Cracks’, in FowlerB. (ed.), Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, pp. 105–119. Oxford: Blackwell/Sociological Review.
74.
WillisP., (1978), Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs, Farnborough: Saxon House.
