In the UK, youthful pregnancy and parenthood is considered an important social and health problem and is the focus of current government intervention. Contemporary policy approaches depict early unplanned pregnancy as a consequence of relative deprivation and a lack of opportunity, leading to ‘low expectations’ among youth, and as the result of sexual ‘mixed messages’ or poor knowledge about contraception. This small scale, qualitative study explores how well these explanations accord with accounts of pregnancy and motherhood provided by young mothers and Teenage Pregnancy Local Co-ordinators in diverse English localities. The results suggest that structural factors may be more important in explaining early pregnancy than those relating to sexual attitudes and knowledge. The tension between the idea of early motherhood as problematic, or even pathological, and early motherhood as rational is also considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddleyE.MaheyC., (2000), ‘Moral minors’, The Guardian, November 16.
2.
Alan Guttmacher Institute, (2002), Teenage Pregnancy: Trends and Lessons Learned, Issues in Brief, 2002 Series, No. 1, New York and Washington: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
3.
AllenI.DowlingS. Bourke, (1998), Teenage Mothers: Decisions and Outcomes, London: Policy Studies Institute.
4.
AraiL. (forthcoming, 2003), ‘British policy on teenage pregnancy and childbearing: The limitations of comparisons with other European countries’. Critical Social Policy
BauderH., (2002), ‘Neighbourhood effects and cultural exclusion’, Urban Studies, 39 (1): 85–93.
7.
BarrettG.WellingsK., (2000), ‘Understanding pregnancy intentions: A problem in evidence everywhere’, Family Planning Perspectives, 32 (4): 194.
8.
BerthoudR.RobsonK., (2001), The Outcomes of Teenage Motherhood in Europe Innocenti Working Paper No. 86, Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
9.
BlakeS.JollyJ., (2002), ‘Evidence and entitlement: Teaching about sex and relationships in schools’ in LeeE.JenkinsT. (eds) Teenage Sex: What Should Schools Teach Children?, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
10.
BradshawJ.FinchN., (2001), Area Variations in Teenage Conceptions and Abortions; a Study Preliminary to Research, University of York: Social Policy Unit.
11.
BurtonL., (1997), ‘Ethnography and the meaning of adolescence in high-risk neighbourhoods’, Ethos, 25 (2): 208–217.
12.
ChevalierA.ViitanenT.K., (2001), The Long-Run Labour Market Consequences of Teenage Motherhood in Britain, Working Paper, London: London School of Economics.
13.
ChurchillD.AllenJ.PringleM.Hippisley-CoxJ.EbdonD.MacphersonM.BradleyS., (2000), ‘Consultation patterns and provision of contraception in general practice before teenage pregnancy: Case-control study’, British Medical Journal, 321: 486–489.
14.
CRD (NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) (1997), Effective Health Care: Preventing and Reducing the Adverse Effects of Unintended Teenage Pregnancies, 3(1), University of York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
15.
CunningtonA.J., (2001), ‘What's so bad about teenage pregnancy?’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 27 (1): 36–41.
16.
de JongeA., (2001), ‘Support for teenage mothers: A qualitative study into the views of women about the support they received as teenage mothers’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36 (1): 49–57.
17.
DunsonD.B.ColomboB.BairdD.D., (2002), ‘Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle’, Human Reproduction, 17: 1399–1403.
18.
FerrimanA., (1999), ‘England launches campaign on teenage pregnancies’, British Medical Journal, 318: 1646.
19.
FurstenbergF.JrBrooks-GunnJ.MorganS. Philip, (1987), Adolescent Mothers in Later Life, New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GarlickR.IneichenB.HudsonF., (1993), ‘The UPA score and teenage pregnancy’, Public Health, 107: 135–139.
21.
GeronimusA., (1997), ‘Teenage childbearing and personal responsibility: An alternative view’, Political Science Quarterly, 112 (3): 405–430.
22.
GeronimusA.T.BoundJ.WaidmannT.A., (1999), ‘Health inequality and population variation in fertility-timing’, Social Science and Medicine, 49 (12): 1623–1636.
23.
GleiD., (1999), ‘Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women’, Family Planning Perspectives, (31) 2: 73–80.
24.
GriffithsC.KirbyL., (2000), ‘Geographic variations in conceptions to women aged under 18 in Great Britain during the 1990s’, Population Trends, Winter, 13–23.
25.
HadleyA., (1998), Getting Real: Improving Teenage Sexual Health', discussion paper 43, London: Fabian Society.
26.
HarlingR., (1999), ‘Making a mess of sex’, British Medical Journal, 318: 1496.
27.
IAGOTP (Independent Advisory Group on Teenage Pregnancy), (2001), First Annual Report, Department of Health, London: Crown Copyright.
28.
JewellD.TacchiJ.DonovanJ., (2000), ‘Teenage pregnancy: Whose problem is it?’, Family Practice, 17 (6): 522–528.
29.
KirbyD., (1985), ‘Sexuality education: A more realistic view of its effects’, Journal of School Health, 55 (10): 421–424.
30.
KirkmanM.HarrisonL.HillierL.PyettP., (2001), ‘“I know I'm doing a good job': Canonical and autobiographical narratives of teenage mothers’, Culture, Health and Sexuality, 3 (3): 279–294.
31.
LawlorD.A.ShawM., (2002), ‘Too much too young? Teenage pregnancy is not a public health problem’, International Journal of Epidemiology, 31: 552–554.
32.
LevitasR., (1998), The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
33.
MacintyreS.Cunningham-BurleyS. (1993), ‘Teenage pregnancy as a social problem: A perspective from the United Kingdom’, in LawsonA.RhodeD.L. (eds), The Politics of Pregnancy: Adolescent Sexuality and Public Policy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
MicklewrightJ.StewartK., (1999), Is Child Welfare Converging in the European Union?, Innocenti Occasional Papers, Economic and Social Policy Series no. 69. Florence, Italy: UNICEF.
35.
OakleyA.FullertonD.HollandJ.ArnoldS.France-DawsonM.KelleyP.McGrellisS., (1995), ‘Sexual health education interventions for young people: A methodological review’, British Medical Journal, 310: 158–162.
36.
OFSTED, (2002), Sex and Relationships, London: Crown Copyright.
37.
PhoenixA. (1991), Young Mothers?, Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
RiceP.L.EzzyD., (2000), Qualitative Research Methods, Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
39.
RosatoM., (1999), Teenage Fertility in England and Wales: Trends in Socio-economic Circumstances between the 1971 and 1981 Censuses, LS Working Paper 78, London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
40.
SahiliS.BrownD.W.MelroseE.MerchantS., (2002), ‘Revisiting a pilot survey involving contraception and teenage pregnancy in Ayrshire and Arran’, The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 28 (1): 37–38.
41.
SciarraD.T.PonterottoJ.G., (1998), ‘Adolescent motherhood among low-income urban Hispanics: Familial considerations of mother-daughter dyads’, Qualitative Health Research, 8 (6): 751–763.
42.
SelmanP., (1998), ‘Teenage Pregnancy, Poverty and the Welfare Debate in Europe and the United States’, report on seminar ‘Poverty, Fertility and Family Planning’ Organized by CICRED and IISUNAM, Mexico, June 2–4.
43.
SinghS.DarrochJ.E., (2000), ‘Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: Levels and trends in developed countries’, Family Planning Perspectives, 32 (1): 14–23.
44.
SinghS.DarrochJ.E., Frost, J., and the Study Team, (2001), ‘Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: The case of five developed countries’, Family Planning Perspectives, 33 (5): 251–258 & 289.
45.
SmithT., (1993), ‘Influence of socioeconomic factors on attaining targets for reducing teenage pregnancies’, British Medical Journal, 306: 1232–1235.
46.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU), (1999), Teenage Pregnancy, London: HMSO.
47.
TabbererS.HallC.PrendergastS.WebsterA., (2000), Teenage Pregnancy and Choice. Abortion or Motherhood: Influences on the Decision, York: YPS Publishing Services Ltd.
48.
Teenage Pregnancy Unit and Neighbourhood Renewal Unit (TPU & NRU), (2002), Teenage Pregnancy and Neighbourhood Renewal: Learning from New Deal for Communities. A Pack Produced by the Teenage Pregnancy Unit with Support from the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, London: HMSO.
49.
UNICEF, (2001), A League Table of Teenage Births in Rich Nations, Innocenti Report Card Issue no. 3, Florence, Italy: UNICEF.
50.
WallaceC., (1987), For Richer, For Poorer: Growing Up In and Out of Work, London: Tavistock.
51.
WestJ., (1999), ‘(Not) talking about sex: Youth, identity and sexuality’, The Sociological Review, 47 (3): 525–547.
52.
WightD.RaabG.M.HendersonM.AbrahamC.BustonK.HartG.ScottS., (2002), ‘Limits of teacher delivered sex education: Interim behavioural outcomes from randomised trial’, British Medical Journal, 324: 1430.
53.
WilsonS.H.BrownT.P.RichardsR.G., (1991), ‘Teenage conception and contraception in the English regions’, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 14 (1): 17–25.
