Young people's engagement in political discussions with parents and friends represents a significant component of the political socialization process and can be seen as an activity where they learn some very basic democratic skills. Based on data from qualitative interviews and a questionnaire survey, this article explores how young people experience political discussions in their everyday life. Our data indicate that young people who feel that their father, mother or friends, respectively, hold more distant political views are less likely to engage in political discussions with each of them. These findings support previous studies in political communication suggesting that people tend to avoid social situations where political disagreements are likely to appear. Furthermore, the results show that there are significant gender differences when analysing the role of the parents as political discussion partners.
AmnåE.EkströmM.KerrM. and StattinH., (2009), ‘Political socialization and human agency: the development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 111 (1): 27–39.
2.
BeckP. A. and JenningsM. K., (1975), ‘Parents as “middlepersons” in political socialization’, Journal of Politics, 37: 83–107.
3.
BloemraadI. and TrostC., (2008), ‘It's a family affair: intergenerational mobilization in the spring 2006 protests’, American Behavioral Scientist, 52 (4): 507–532.
4.
BrymanA., (2007), ‘Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 (1): 8–22.
5.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L. and VerbaS., (2001), The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Quality, and Political Participation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CofféH. and BolzendahlC., (2010), ‘Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation’, Sex Roles, 62: 318–333.
7.
ConoverP. J.SearingD. D., and CreweI. M., (2002), ‘The deliberative potential of political discussion’, British Journal of Political Science, 32 (1): 21–62.
8.
CreswellJ. W., (2009), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
CreswellJ. W. and ClarkV. L. Plano, (2007), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
EastonD. and DennisJ., (1969), Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EkströmM. and ÖstmanJ., (2013), ‘Family talk, peer talk and young people's civic orientation’, European Journal of Communication, 28 (3): 294–308.
12.
EsterlingK. M.FungA. and LeeT., (2010). ‘How much disagreement is good for democratic deliberation? The CaliforniaSpeaks Health Care Reform Experiment’, Working Paper.
13.
GidengilE.O'NeillB. and YoungL., (2011), ‘Her mother's daughter? The influence of childhood socialization on women's political engagement’, Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 31: 334–355.
14.
GreeneJ. C., (2008), ‘Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2 (1): 7–22.
15.
GreensteinF. I., (1965), Children and Politics, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
16.
GundelachP. and LevinsenK., (2011), Gender and Parental Political in Europe, ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 November.
17.
GutmannA. and ThompsonD., (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
HessR. and TorneyJ., (1967), The Development of Political Attitudes in Children, Chicago: Aldine Transaction Publishers.
19.
HoogheM. and BoonenJ., (2013), ‘The intergenerational transmission of voting intentions in a multiparty setting: an analysis of voting intentions and political discussion among 15-year-old adolescents and their parents in Belgium’, Youth & Society (published online, printed version forthcoming), doi: 10.1177/0044118x13496826.
20.
HuberG. A. and MalhotraN., (2013), ‘Dimensions of political homophily: isolating choice homophily along political characteristics’, Working Paper.
21.
HymanH., (1959), Political Socialization: A Study in the Psychology of Political Behaviour, Toronto: Collier-MacMillan.
22.
JenningsM. K., (1983), ‘Gender roles and inequalities in political participation: results from an eight-nation study’, Political Research Quarterly, 36 (3): 364–385.
23.
JenningsM. K., (2007), ‘Political socialization’, in DaltonR. J. and KlingemannH.-D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, 29–44, New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
JenningsM. K. and LangtonK. P., (1969), ‘Mothers versus fathers: the formation of political orientations among young Americans’, The Journal of Politics, 31 (2): 329–358.
25.
JenningsM. K. and NiemiR. G., (1968), ‘The transmission of political values from parent to child’, The American Political Science Review, 62 (1): 169–184.
26.
JenningsM. K. and NiemiR. G., (1971), ‘The division of political labour between mothers and fathers’, The American Political Science Review65 (1), 69–82.
27.
JenningsM. K.StokerL. and BowersJ., (2009), ‘Politics across generations: family transmission reexamined’, Journal of Politics, 71 (3): 780–799.
28.
McGlennN., (1980), ‘The impact of parenthood on political participation’, Western Political Quarterly, 33 (3): 297–313.
29.
McLeodJ. M., (2000), ‘Media and civic socialization of youth’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 27: 45–51.
30.
McLeodJ. M.ShahD.HessD. and LeeN., (2010), ‘Communication and education: creating competence for socialization into public life’, in SherrodL. R.Torney-PurtaJ. and FlanaganC. (eds), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth, 363–391, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
31.
McIntoshH.HartD. and YounissJ., (2007), ‘The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: which parent qualities matter?’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 40 (3): 495–499.
32.
MorrellM. E. (2005), ‘Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy’, Political Behavior, 27 (1): 49–69.
33.
MutzD., (2002), ‘Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice’, American Political Science Review, 96 (2): 111–126.
34.
MutzD., (2006), Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
MutzD. C. and MartinP. S., (2001), ‘Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: the role of mass media’, American Political Science Review, 95 (1): 97–114.
36.
NieuwbeertaP., and WittebroodK., (1995), ‘Intergenerational transmission of political party preference in the Netherlands’, Social Science Research, 24: 243–261.
37.
ClarkV. L. PlanoCreswellJ. W.GreenD. O. N. and ShopeR. J., (2008), ‘Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches: an introduction to emergent mixed methods research’, in Hesse-BiberS. N. and LeavyP. (eds), Handbook of Emergent Methods, New York: Guilford Press.
38.
QuintelierE., (2011), ‘Political socialization among young people: evidence from a two-year panel study’, Politics, Culture and Socialization, 2 (2): 193–206.
39.
QuintelierE., (2015), ‘Engaging adolescents in politics: the longitudinal effect of political socialization agents’, Youth & Society, 47 (1): 51–69.
40.
VerbaS.BurnsN. and SchlozmanK. L., (1997), ‘Knowing and caring about politics: gender and political engagement’, Journal of Politics, 59: 1051–1072.
