When State Policies Meet Local District Contexts: Standards-Based Professional Development as a Means to Individual Agency and Collective Ownership

Abstract

This article focuses on how a statewide reform initiative, when envisioned as a professional development opportunity, impacted teachers’ capacities to become change agents in their classrooms and districts and how individual district contexts shaped the development of those capacities. The interview and artifact data used for this study were gathered from teachers and administrators in four demonstration districts that were involved in a standards-based professional development initiative within the federally funded Michigan English Language Arts Framework (MELAF) project. These data reveal that teachers experienced changes in their personal literacy practices and views of themselves as learners and felt an increased ability to evince change in a variety of educational contexts, including their classrooms, buildings, and districts. Across these changes in teachers’ practices, district patterns emerged that spoke to the individual districts’ capacities to support teacher growth and foster reform. These differences suggest that the changes that took place were a function of many factors, including the size and structure of the district, the district's readiness for change, and the source of language arts leadership within the district. One implication of these results is that the particular histories and competing forces that operate for both individuals and districts shape the implementation of new policy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

(1995). Reading and writing workshop? What's new about that? Literacy Consortium Journal, Spring, 31–35.

Borman

, & Cusick

(1998). Top-down and bottom-up: Teachers as policy advocates in the Michigan English Language Arts Frameworks Project. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Cambourne

(1995). Toward an educational relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. Reading Teacher, 49, 182–190.

Cohen

, & Ball

(1990a). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233–239.

Cohen

, & Ball

(1990b). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 331–338.

Darling-Hammond

, & McLaughlin

M. W.

(1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.

Dewey

(1990). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fullan

(1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 420–423.

Fullan

, & Hargreaves

(1992). Teachers development and educational change. In Fullan

, & Hargreaves

(Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1–9). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.

10.

Kanevsky

R. D.

(1992). The descriptive review of a child: Teachers learn about values. In Andrias

(Ed.), Exploring values and standards: Implications for assessment. New York: Teachers College National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching.

11.

Lieberman

(1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.

12.

Lieberman

, & Grolnick

(1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98, 7–45.

13.

Lieberman

, & Miller

(Eds.). (1991). Staff development for the ‘90s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives. New York: Teachers College Press.

14.

Little

J. W.

(1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129–151.

15.

McLaughlin

(1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171–178.

16.

Meier

(1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.

17.

Newmann

, & Wehlage

(1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50, 7, 8–12.

18.

Routman

(1994). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners, K–12. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.

19.

Spillane

(1996). Districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10, 63–87.

20.

Spillane

, & Thompson

(1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185–203.

21.

Standerford

(1997). Reforming reading instruction on multiple levels: Interrelations and disconnections across the state, district, and classroom levels. Educational Policy, 11, 58–91.

22.

Vygotsky

(1965). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

23.

Yin

R. K.

(1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.