This research assesses two individual differences—general self–efficacy and regretful thinking—in the context of technological innovation. Results, obtained from a random sample of 217 patent inventors show that both general self–efficacy and regretful thinking distinguish inventors who started a business (i.e., technological entrepreneurs) from inventors who did not start a new business (i.e., technological nonentrepreneurs). More to the point, patent inventors, who at the time of our survey were actively involved in new business formation, tended to have significantly higher self–efficacy. Also, while technological entrepreneurs tended to have stronger regrets about business opportunities, technological nonentrepreneurs tended to have stronger regrets regarding career and education decisions. The two groups did not differ in terms of the quantity of these regrets. Implications for theory, practice, and future study of individual differences in entrepreneurship are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmitR. & SchoemakerP. J. H. (1993).Strategic assets and organizational rent.Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.
2.
BalkinD. B., MarkmanG. D. & Gomez–MejiaL. (2000).Is CEO pay in high technology firms related to innovation?Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1118–1129.
3.
BanduraA. (1997).Self–efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
4.
BanduraA. (1999).Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41.
5.
BaronR. A. (1998).Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people.Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.
6.
BaronR. A. (2000).Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effect of thinking about “what might have been.”. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 79–92.
7.
BaumR. J. & LockeE. A. (2002) Entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation and subsequent venture growth. Working Paper, University of Maryland.
8.
BaumR. J., LockeE. A. & SmithK. G. (2001).A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.
9.
BusenitzL. & BarneyJ. (1997).Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision–making.Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.
10.
CarterN. M., GartnerW. B. & ReynoldsP. D. (1996).Exploring start–up event sequences.Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 151–166.
11.
ChenC. C., GreeneP. G. & CrickA. (1998).Does entrepreneurial self–efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316.
12.
ChenG., GullyS. M. & EdenD. (2001).Validation of a new general self–efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83.
13.
CreyerE. H. & GurhanZ. (1997).Who's to blame? Counterfactual reasoning and the assignment of blame.Psychology and Marketing, 14, 209–222.
14.
DailyC. M., CertoS. T. & DaltonD. R. (1999).Entrepreneurial ventures as an avenue to the top: Assessing the advancement of female CEOs and directors in the Inc. 100. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 19–32.
15.
DavisM. S. (1971).That's interesting!Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309–344.
16.
De NobleA. F., JungD. & EhrlichS. B. (1999).Entrepreneurial self–efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. In P. D. Reynolds, W. D. Bygrave, S. Manigart, C. M. Mason, G. D. Meyer, H. J. Sapienza & K. S. Shaver (Eds.). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp.73–87.
17.
DouglasE. J. & ShepherdD. A. (2000).Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 231–251.
18.
EdenD. & AviramA. (1993).Self–efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 352–360.
19.
FietJ. O. (2002).The Systematic Search for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
20.
GistM. E. & MitchellT. R. (1992).Self–efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
21.
GrilichesA. (1990).Patent statistics as economic indicators. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
22.
HamiltonB. H. (2000).Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self–employment. The Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 604–631.
23.
HonigB. (1998).What determines success? Examining the human, financial, and social capital of Jamaican microentrepreneurs.Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 371–394.
KruegerN., Jr. (1993).The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
26.
KruegerN., Jr. & DicksonP. R. (1994).How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self–efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.
27.
LoomesG. & SugdenR. (1986).Disappointment and dynamic inconsistency in choice under uncertainty.Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282.
28.
MaurerT. J. & PierceH. R. (1998).A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self–efficacy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329.
29.
MedvecV. H., MadeyS. F. & GilovichT. (1995).When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medallists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.
30.
MeschG. S. & CzamanskiD. (1997).Occupational closure and immigrant entrepreneurship: Russian Jews in Israel.Journal of Socio-Economics, 26, 597–610.
31.
MitchellT. R. & MickelA. E. (1999).The meaning of money: An individual–difference perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 568–578.
32.
ReynoldsP. D. (1997).Who starts new firms? Preliminary explorations of firms–in–gestation.Small Business Economics, 9, 449–462.
33.
RobinsonP. B., StimpsonD. V., HuefnerJ. C. & HuntH. K. (1991).An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13–31.
34.
RoeseN. J. (1997).Counterfactual thinking.Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–149.
35.
RomerP. M. (1996).Why, indeed, in America? Theory, history, and the origins of modern economic growth. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 202–206.
36.
SarasvathyD. K., SimonH. A. & LaveL. (1999).Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33, 207–225.
37.
ShaneS. (2000).Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities.Organization Science, 11, 448–469.
38.
ShaneS. & VenkataramanS. (2000).The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
39.
StewartW. H., Jr., WatsonW. E., CarlandJ. C. & CarlandJ. A. (1999).Proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers.Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 189–214.
40.
TimmonsJ. A. (1999).New venture creation, 5th ed.Boston: Irwin McGraw–Hill.
41.
Van DijkW. W., ZeelenbergM. & Van Der PligtJ. (1999).Not having what you want versus having what you do not want: The impact of type of negative outcome on the experience of disappointment and related emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13(2), 129–148.
42.
VasilL. (1992).Self–efficacy expectations and causal attributions for achievement among male and female university faculty.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 259–269.
43.
VenkataramanS. (1997).The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An Editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 3, 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
WanbergC. R., KanferR. & RotundoM. (1999).Unemployed individuals: Motives, job–search competencies, and job–search constraints as predictors of job seeking and reemployment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 897–910.
45.
WoodR. & BanduraA. (1989).Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.
46.
ZeelenbergM., Van DijkW. W., Van Der PligtJ., MansteadA. S. R., Van EmpelenP., ReindermanD. (1998).Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(2), 117–141.
