While effective HR services and programs can help firms gain competitive advantage, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often lack the internal resources required to develop and deliver these services and programs. As a result, SMEs increasingly are outsourcing HR activities to professional employer organizations (PEOs). Questions remain, however, about the conditions under which SMEs will benefit from outsourcing HR to a PEO, as well as about the type of benefits that are potentially available. The very nature of many HR activities raises questions about the risks associated with market governance and a PEO's ability to ensure service quality for SMEs. In order for these questions to be addressed, it is necessary to understand the process by which PEO utilization affects SME outcomes. In this article, we use transaction cost economics, social exchange theory, and the strategic HR literature to develop a framework for understanding the factors and conditions likely to affect whether and how an SME will benefit from using a PEO.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurJ.B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel mini–mills.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488–506.
2.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
3.
BaronJ.N., BurtonD.M., & HannonM.T. (1996). The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies.Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 239–275.
4.
BaronJ.N. & KrepsD.M. (1999). Strategic human resources. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BarzellY. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets.Journal of Law & Economics, 25, 27–48.
6.
BeckerB.E. & GerhartB. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects.Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779–801.
7.
BeckerB.E. & HuselidM.A. (1999). Overview: Strategic human resource management in five leading firms.Human Resource Management.38, 287–302.
8.
BlauP.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
9.
ColemanJ.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
10.
ConnorK.R. & PrahaladC.K. (1996). A resource–based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism.Organizational Science, 7, 477–501.
11.
CookM.F. (1999). Outsourcing human resource functions. American Management Association, New York.
12.
DasT.K. & TengB. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances.Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.
13.
DeleryJ.E. (1999). Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research.Human Resource Management Review, 8, 289–309.
14.
DeleryJ.E. & DotyD.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions.Academy of Management Journal, 39, 803–835.
15.
DowG. (1987). The function of authority in transaction cost economics.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, 13–38.
16.
GhoshalS. & MoranP. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory.Academy of Management Review, 21, 7–12.
17.
GreerC.R., YoungbloodS.A., & GrayD.A. (1999). Human resource outsourcing: The make or buy decision.Academy of Management Executive, 13, 85–96.
18.
GulatiR. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances.Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85–112.
19.
HannonM.T., BurtonM.D., & BaronJ.N. (1996). Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms.Industrial & Corporate Change, 5, 503–536.
20.
HartO. (1988). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm.Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 4, 119–139.
21.
HelperS. & LevineD. (1992). Long–term supplier relations and product–market structure.Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 8, 561–581.
22.
HirschmanC. (1997). All aboard: The boom in employee leasing may bring good career opportunities for HR professionals.HR Magazine, 42, 80–86.
23.
HirschmanC. (2000). For PEOs, business is still booming.HR Magazine, 45, 42–48.
24.
HoloviakJ.J. & DeCenzoD.A. (1982). Effective employee relations: An aid in small business's struggle for survival.American Journal of Small Business, 6, 49–54.
25.
HuselidM.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.
26.
HuselidM.A., JacksonS.E., & SchulerR.S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness determinants of firm performance.Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171–188.
27.
JonesG.R. & GeorgeJ.M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork.Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–540.
28.
JoskowP. (1988). Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: Empirical evidence.Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4, 95–117.
29.
KlaasB.S., McClendonJ., & GaineyT. (1999). HR outsourcing and its impact: The role of transaction costs.Personnel Psychology, 52, 113–136.
30.
KlaasB.S., McClendonJ., & GaineyT. (2000). Managing HR in the small and medium enterprise: The impact of professional employer organizations.Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25, 107–124.
31.
LePakD.P. & SnellS.A. (1999a). Virtual HR: Strategic human resources in the 21st century.Human Resource Management Review, 8, 215–234.
32.
LePakD.P. & SnellS.A. (1999b). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development.Academy of Management Review, 24, 31–48.
33.
LeverS. (1997). An analysis of managerial motivations behind outsourcing practices in human resources.Human Resource Planning, 20, 37–48.
34.
LewickiR.J., McAllisterD.J., & BiesR.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities.Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.
35.
MastenS. & CrockerK. (1985). Efficient adaptation in long–term contracts: Take or pay provisions for natural gas.American Economic Review, 75, 1085–1096.
36.
MayerR.C., DavisJ.H., & SchoormanD. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
37.
McKnightD.H., CummingsL.L., & ChervanyN.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships.Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.
38.
NAPEO. (1993). The business of employee leasing, Alexandria, VA: NAPEO.
39.
NooteboomB., BergerH., & NoorderhavenN.G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk.Academy of Management Journal, 40, 308–338.
40.
RingP.S. & Van de VenA. (1992). Structuring cooperative relations between organizations.Strategic Management Journal, 12, 483–498.
41.
RiordanM. & WilliamsonO. (1985). Asset specificity and economic organization.International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, 365–378.
42.
SextonD.L., UptonN.B., WacholtzL.E., & McDougallP.P. (1997). Learning needs of growth–oriented entrepreneurs.Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 1–8.
43.
ShelanskiH.A. & KleinP.G. (1995). Empirical work in transaction cost economics.Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11, 335–361.
44.
UlrichD. (1996). Human resource champions. Boston: Harvard University Press.
45.
WalkerG. & WeberD. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 373–391.
46.
WelbourneT.A. & CyrL.A. (1999). The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms.Academy of Management Journal, 42, 616–632.
47.
WilliamsonO.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
48.
WilliamsonO.E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
WrightP.M., GerhartB., SnellS.A., & McMahanG.C. (1997). Strategic human resource management: Building human capital and organizational capacity. Technical Report, SHRM Foundation and Human Resource Planning Society Alexandria, VA.
50.
WrightP.M., SmartD.L., & McMahanG.C. (1995). Matches between human resources and strategy among NCAA basketball teams.Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1052–1074.
