Are all transnational exchanges ‘fielded’? This article explores the limits of the concept of transnational field by focusing on the case of journalism. At first glance, journalism might seem to be the perfect example of a transnational field. The frequency, speed and extent of international exchanges between media outlets has increased dramatically with the development of online news, leading media scholars to develop the concept of ‘global news’. Yet I argue that such international exchanges do not necessarily constitute a field. Using ethnographic methods, I analyse the circulation of online news between the United States and France, two countries with strikingly different journalistic traditions. Specifically, I compare two editorial partnerships between US and French websites, one linking prestigious online magazines across the Atlantic and the other connecting tabloid-oriented news sites. I find that editorial content does not circulate seamlessly between the two countries. Based on this study, the article proposes three criteria that must be met for transnational fields to exist: competition over the legitimate definition of the field, reciprocal field effects, and the existence of common stakes. More broadly, the article contributes to defining the limits of the concept of ‘transnational field’ for the study of international exchanges.
BeckerH. S., (1982), Art Worlds, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
BensonR., (2013), Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison, New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BensonR. and NeveuE. (eds), (2005), Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BensonR. and SaguyA. C., (2005), ‘Constructing social problems in an age of globalization: A French-American comparison’, American Sociological Review, 70 (2): 233–259.
6.
BerglezP., (2008), ‘What is global journalism?’, Journalism Studies, 9 (6): 845–858.
7.
BielsaE. and BassnettS., (2009), Translation in Global News, New York: Routledge.
8.
BourdieuP., (1971), ‘Genèse et structure du champ religieux’, Revue Française de Sociologie, 12 (3): 295–334.
9.
BourdieuP., (1994), ‘L'emprise du journalisme’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 101: 3–9.
10.
BourdieuP., (1996a), The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP., (1996b), The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuP., (1999), On Television. New York: The New Press.
13.
BourdieuP., (2002), ‘Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 145 (5): 3–8.
14.
BourdieuP. and WacquantL. J. D., (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Boyd-BarrettO. and RantanenT., (1998), The Globlization of News, London: SAGE.
16.
ChalabyJ. K., (1996), ‘Journalism as an Anglo-American invention: A comparison of the development of French and Anglo-American journalism, 1830s–1920s’, European Journal of Communication, 11 (3): 303–326.
17.
CharonJ.-M. and Le FlochP., (2011), La Presse en Ligne, Paris: La Découverte.
18.
ChristinA., (2014a), ‘Clicks or Pulitzers? Web journalists and their work in the United States and France’, PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Princeton University / Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
19.
ChristinA., (2014b), ‘When it comes to counting clicks, journalists say one thing but feel pressure to do another’, Nieman Journalism Lab, August issue.
DezalayY. and GarthB. G., (1998), Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
DezalayY. and GarthB. G., (2002), The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
FillouxF., (2014), ‘Buzz Feed: An Open Letter to Ben Horowitz’, Monday Note, 334, September 7.
24.
FourcadeM., (2006), ‘The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics’, American Journal of Sociology, 112 (1): 145–194.
25.
FröhlichR. and Holtz-BachaC., (2003), Journalism Education in Europe and North America: An International Comparison, New York: Hampton Press.
26.
GatienE., (2013), Prétendre à l'excellence. Prix Albert Londres, prix journalistiques et transformations du journalisme, Paris: Fondation Varenne.
27.
GingrasY., (2002), ‘Les formes spécifiques de l'internationalité du champ scientifique’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 141–142 (1): 31–45.
28.
GoJ., (2008), ‘Global fields and imperial forms: Field theory and the British and American Empires’, Sociological Theory, 26 (3): 201–229.
29.
GurevitchM. and LevyM., (1990), ‘The global newsroom’, British Journalism Review, 2 (1): 27–37.
30.
HallinD. C. and ManciniP., (2004), Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HamiltonJ. M. and JennerE., (2004), ‘Redefining foreign correspondence’, Journalism5 (3): 301–321.
32.
HannerzU., (2012), Foreign News: Exploring the World of Foreign Correspondents, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
HauchecorneM., (2009), ‘Le “professeur Rawls” et le “Nobel des pauvres”’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 176–177 (1): 94–113.
34.
HeilbronJ.GuilhotN., and JeanpierreL., (2008), ‘Toward a transnational history of the social sciences’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44 (2): 146–160.
HineC., (2007), ‘Multi-sited ethnography as a middle-range methodology for contemporary STS’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32 (6): 652–671.
37.
JanssenS.KuipersG. and VerboordM., (2008), ‘Cultural globalization and arts journalism: The international orientation of arts and culture coverage in Dutch, French, German, and U.S. newspapers, 1955 to 2005’, American Sociological Review, 73 (5): 719–740.
38.
KrauseM., (2011), ‘Reporting and the transformations of the journalistic field: US news media, 1890–000’, Media, Culture & Society, 33 (1): 89–104.
39.
KuipersG., (2011), ‘Cultural globalization as the emergence of a transnational cultural field: Transnational television and national media landscapes in four European countries’. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(5): 541–557.
40.
LafargeG. and MarchettiD., (2011), ‘Les portes fermées du journalisme’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 189 (4): 72–99.
41.
LasorsaD. L.LewisS. C. and HoltonA. E., (2012). ‘Normalizing Twitter’, Journalism Studies, 13 (1): 19–36.
42.
LoeffelholzM.WeaverD. and SchwarzA., (2008), Global Journalism Research: Theories, Methods, Findings, Future, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
43.
MudgeS. L. and VauchezA., (2012), ‘Building Europe on a weak field: Law, economics, and scholarly avatars in transnational politics’, American Journal of Sociology, 118 (2): 449–492.
44.
PadioleauJ. G., (1985), Le Monde et le Washington Post: Précepteurs et Mousquetaires, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
45.
PalmerM., (1983), Des petits journaux aux grandes agences: naissance du journalisme moderne, 1863–1914, Paris: Aubier.
46.
PettegreeA., (2014), The Invention of News: How the World Came to Know about Itself, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
ReeseS. D., (2010), ‘Journalism and globalization’, Sociology Compass, 4 (6): 344–353.
49.
ReeseS. D.RutiglianoL.HyunK. and JeongJ., (2007), ‘Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena’, Journalism, 8 (3): 235–261.
50.
RuellanD., (1993), Le Professionnalisme du Flou: Identité et Savoir-faire des Journalistes Français, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
51.
SapiroG., (2013), ‘Le champ est-il national?’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 200 (5): 70–85.
52.
SapiroG. (eds), (2008), Translatio: Le marché de la traduction en France à l'heure de la mondialisation, Paris: CNRS.
53.
SchudsonM., (2011), The Sociology of News, New York: Norton.
54.
SteinmetzG., (2008), ‘The colonial state as a social field: Ethnographic capital and native policy in the German Overseas Empire before 1914’, American Sociological Review, 73 (4): 589–612.
ThurmanN., (2007), ‘The globalization of journalism online. a transatlantic study of news websites and their international readers’, Journalism, 8 (3): 285–307.
57.
UsherN., (2014), Making News at The New York Times, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
58.
UtleyG., (1997), ‘The shrinking of foreign news: From broadcast to narrowcast’, Foreign Affairs, 76 (2): 2–10.
59.
Van DijkJ. A. G., (2006), ‘Digital divide research: Achievements and shortcomings’, Poetics, 34 (4–5): 221–235.
60.
WagnerA.-C., (2005), Vers une Europe syndicale: Une enquête sur la Confédération européenne des syndicats, Bellecombe-en-Bauges: Editions du Croquant.
61.
WillnatL. and WeaverD., (2003), ‘Through their eyes: The work of foreign correspondents in the United States’, Journalism, 4 (4): 403–422.
62.
WimmerA. and SchillerN. G., (2003), ‘Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology’, International Migration Review, 37 (3): 576–610.
