Although sociologists in Britain have debated the nature of their field's relationship with biology since the late nineteenth century, interest in the full range of responses has only grown in recent years. This paper contributes to the spirit of historical revisionism by turning to the work of the biologist and first director of UNESCO, Julian Huxley (1887–1975). Paying particular attention to the doctrine he called ‘scientific humanism’ and his ideas about a biosocial agenda separate from the priorities of biology itself, the paper uses historical tools to address a concern that has frequently cast a shadow over debates about biosocial science: does it interfere with the progressive agenda sociologists have traditionally seen themselves as contributing to? The paper argues that Huxley's work is evidence that biosocial science is compatible with progressive goals and that recent developments in biology mean it may be the ideal time to reconsider long-standing attitudes.
BarkanE., (1992), The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BowlerP., (2003), Evolution: The History of an Idea, 3rd edn, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
CasperS. T., (2014), ‘History and neuroscience: An integrative legacy’, Isis, 105 (1): 123–132.
4.
CockettR., (1995), Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–83, London: Harper Collins.
5.
CooterR., (2014), ‘Neural veils and the will to historical critique: Why historians of science need to take the neuro-turn seriously’, Isis, 105 (1): 145–154.
6.
CrewF. A. E.DarlingtonC. D.HaldaneJ. B. S.HarlandC.HogbenL. T.HuxleyJ. S.MullerH. J.NeedhamJ.ChildG. P.KollerP. C.DavidP. R.LandauerW.DahlbergG.PloughH. H.DobzhanskyTh.PriceB.EmersonR. A.SchultzJ.GordonC.SteinbergA. G.HammondJ.WaddingtonC. H.HuskinsC. L., (1939), ‘Social biology and population improvement’, Nature, 144 (3646): 521–522.
7.
DivallC., (1992), ‘From a Victorian to a modern: Julian Huxley and the English intellectual climate’, in WatersC. K.Van HeldenA. (eds), Julian Huxley: Biologist and Statesman of Science, 21–44, Houston: Rice University Press.
8.
DorlingD., (2013), Population 10 Billion: The Coming Demographic Crisis and How to Survive It, London: Constable.
9.
DupréJ., (2001), Human Nature and the Limits of Science, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
ElwickJ., (2003), ‘Herbert Spencer and the disunity of the social organism’, History of Science, 41 (1): 35–72.
11.
ErlingssonS. J., (2005), ‘The rise of experimental zoology in Britain in the 1920s: Hogben, Huxley, Crew, and the Society for Experimental Biology’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
12.
ErlingssonS. J., (2009), ‘The Plymouth Laboratory and the institutionalization of experimental zoology in Britain in the 1920s’, Journal of the History of Biology, 42 (1): 151–183.
13.
EspositoM., (2011), ‘Utopianism in the British evolutionary synthesis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42 (1): 40–49.
14.
FarberP. L., (1998), The Temptations of Evolutionary Ethics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
FisherR. A., (1930), The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
BoxJ. Fisher, (1978), R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17.
FullerS., (2006), The New Sociological Imagination, London: Sage.
18.
FullerS., (2011), Humanity 2.0: What it Means to Be Human Past Present and Future, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
FullerS., (2014), ‘Neuroscience, neurohistory, and the history of science: A tale of two brain images’, Isis, 105 (1): 100–109.
20.
GouldS. J., (1996), ‘The smoking gun of eugenics’, in GouldS. J., Dinosaur in a Haystack: Reflections in Natural History, 296–308, London: Jonathan Cape.
21.
HobhouseL. T., (1908), ‘Editorial’, The Sociological Review, 1 (1): 1–11.
22.
HogbenL., (1930), The Nature of Living Matter, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
23.
HogbenL., (1931), Genetic Principles and Medicine and Social Science, London: Williams & Norgate.
24.
HuxleyJ., (1931), What Dare I Think? The Challenge of Modern Science to Human Action and Belief, London: Chatto & Windus.
25.
HuxleyJ., (1935), ‘Can sociology become a science’, Saturday Review of Literature, 12 (13): 3–4, 14–15.
26.
HuxleyJ., (1936a), ‘Eugenics and society’, Eugenics Review, 28 (1): 11–31.
27.
HuxleyJ., (1936b), ‘Natural selection and evolutionary progress’, British Association for the Advancement of Science, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1936 (106th Year). Blackpool, 9–16 September, Sectional Presidents' Addresses, 81–100.
28.
HuxleyJ., (1939a), Essays of a Biologist, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
29.
HuxleyJ., (1939b [1923]), ‘Biology and sociology’, in HuxleyJ., Essays of a Biologist, 69–104, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
30.
HuxleyJ., (1941a), ‘The uniqueness of man’, in HuxleyJ., The Uniqueness of Man, 1–33, London: Chatto & Windus. Article first published in 1939.
31.
HuxleyJ., (1941b), ‘Scientific humanism’, in HuxleyJ., The Uniqueness of Man, 260–276, London: Chatto & Windus. Article first published in 1931.
32.
HuxleyJ., (1941c), ‘Science, natural and social’, in HuxleyJ., The Uniqueness of Man, 222–251, London: Chatto & Windus. Article first published in 1940.
33.
HuxleyJ., (1942), Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, London: George Allen and Unwin.
HuxleyJ., (1959a), ‘Man's place and role in nature’, in HuxleyJ., New Bottles for New Wine, 41–60. London: Chatto & Windus. Article originally published in 1955.
36.
HuxleyJ., (1959b), ‘Evolution, cultural and biological’, in HuxleyJ., New Bottles for New Wine, 61–92, London: Chatto & Windus. Article originally published in 1955.
37.
HuxleyJ., (1959c), ‘Transhumanism’, in HuxleyJ., New Bottles for New Wine, 13–17, London: Chatto & Windus.
38.
HuxleyJ. (ed.), (1961), The Humanist Frame, London: George Allen & Unwin.
39.
HuxleyJ., (1970), Memories, London: George Allen and Unwin.
40.
HuxleyJ.HaddonA. C., (1935), We Europeans: A Survey of ‘Racial Problems’, London: Jonathan Cape.
41.
HuxleyT. H.HuxleyJ., (1947), Evolution and Ethics, 1893–1943, London: Pilot Press.
42.
KellerE. F., (2000), The Century of the Gene, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
KevlesD., (1985), In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
MackenzieD., (1980), Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
45.
MayrE., (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, Cambridge, MA: Belknapp Press.
46.
MayrE.ProvineW. (eds), (1980), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
MazumdarP. M. H., (1992), Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, its Sources and its Critics in Britain, London: Routledge.
48.
MeloniM., (2014), ‘Biology without biologism: Social theory in a postgenomic age’, Sociology, 48 (4): 731–746.
49.
OlbyR., (1992), ‘Huxley's place in twentieth-century biology’, in WatersC. K.Van HeldenA. (eds), Julian Huxley: Biologist and Statesman of Science, 53–75, Houston: Rice University Press.
50.
OsborneT.RoseN., (2008), ‘Populating sociology: Carr-Saunders and the problem of population’, The Sociological Review, 56 (4): 552–578.
51.
PaulD. B., (1998), The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
PinderJ. (ed.), (1981), Fifty Years of Political and Economic Planning: Looking Forward, 1931–1981, London: Heinemann.
53.
RenwickC., (2012), British Sociology's Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
RenwickC., (2014), ‘Completing the circle of the social sciences?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44 (4): 478–496.
55.
RenwickC., (forthcoming), ‘Eugenics, population research, and the origins of social mobility studies in early and mid-twentieth-century Britain’, The Historical Journal.
56.
RichersonP. J.BoydR., (2006), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
RoseN.Abi-RachedJ. M., (2013), Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
RuncimanW. G., (1998), The Social Animal, London: Harper Collins.
59.
RuncimanW. G., (2010), The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
ScottJ.HusbandsC. T., (2007), ‘Victor Branford and the building of British sociology’, The Sociological Review, 55 (3): 460–484.
61.
SegerstråleU., (2000), Defenders of the Truth: The Sociobiology Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
SmailD. L., (2007), On Deep History and the Brain, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
63.
SmailD. L., (2014), ‘Neurohistory in action: Hoarding and the human past’, Isis, 105 (1): 110–122.
64.
SmocovitisV. B., (1996), Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
SolowayR. A., (1995), Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
66.
StadlerM., (2014), ‘Neurohistory is bunk? The not-so-deep history of the postclassical mind’, Isis, 105 (1): 133–144.
67.
StudholmeM., (2007), ‘Patrick Geddes: Founder of environmental sociology’, The Sociological Review, 55 (3): 441–459.
68.
SzreterS., (1996), Fertility, Class, and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
TaberyJ., (2014), Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
ThomsonM., (1998), The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain, c. 1870–1959, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
71.
UNESCO, (1952), The Race Concept: Results of an Enquiry, Paris: UNESCO.
72.
WellsH. G.HuxleyJ.WellsG. P., (1931), The Science of Life, London: Cassell and Co.
73.
WerskeyG., (1978), The Visible College, London: Allen Lane.
74.
WilsonD. S., (2002), Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
75.
WilsonD. S., (2011), The Neighbourhood Project: Using Evolution to Improve My City, One Block at a Time, New York: Little, Brown and Co.
76.
WitkowskiJ. A., (1992), ‘Julian Huxley in the laboratory: Embracing inquisitiveness and widespread curiosity’, in WatersC. K.Van HeldenA. (eds), Julian Huxley: Biologist and Statesman of Science, 79–103, Houston: Rice University Press.
