Research has repeatedly found that displacement is not more likely in gentrifying neighborhoods. Since the dependent variable—displacement—is difficult to measure, researchers resort to a variety of proxy measures for it. I classify three types of proxies: a population approach that measures compositional changes in neighborhoods over time, an individual approach that measures individual housing mobility, and a motivational approach that traces both individual mobility as well as the reasons why a household moved to determine whether that move was involuntary. I examine the prevalence of these approaches across a sample of the literature. I then test the commensurability of the proxy measures with data from New York City by comparing the rank orderings of neighborhoods with the most and least displacement. I find widely different results across the approaches. I explain these results by examining the underlying mechanisms of displacement that are masked by the other approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonRowland. 2000. “Measuring Gentrification and Displacement in Greater London.” Urban Studies37(1):149–65.
2.
BartonMichael. 2016. “An Exploration of the Importance of the Strategy Used to Identify Gentrification.” Urban Studies53(1):92–111.
3.
BetancurJohn. 2011. “Gentrification and Community Fabric in Chicago.” Urban Studies48(2):383–406.
4.
Brown–SaracinoJaponica. 2009. A Neighborhood That Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
Brown–SaracinoJaponica. 2017. “Explicating Divided Approaches to Gentrification and Growing Income Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology43(1):515–39.
6.
ChappleKaren and ZukMiriam. 2016. “Forewarned: The Use of Neighborhood Early Warning Systems for Gentrification and Displacement.” Cityscape18(3):109–30.
7.
DavidsonMark and LeesLoretta. 2010. “New–Build Gentrification: Its Histories, Trajectories, and Critical Geographies.” Population, Space and Place16:395–411.
8.
DesmondMatthew. 2016. “Milwaukee Area Renters Study (MARS).” Harvard Dataverse V3.
9.
DesmondMatthew. 2018. “Heavy Is the House: Rent Burden Among the American Urban Poor: FORUM.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(1):160–70.
10.
DesmondMatthew, GershensonCarl, and KiviatBarbara. 2015. “Forced Relocation and Residential Instability Among Urban Renters.” Social Service Review89(2):227–62.
11.
DingLei, HwangJackelyn, and DivringiEileen. 2016. “Gentrification and Residential Mobility in Philadelphia.” Regional Science and Urban Economics61:38–51.
12.
DrewRachel Bogardus. 2018. Gentrification: Framing Our Perceptions. Columbia, MD: Enterprise Community Partners, Inc.
13.
EllenIngrid Gould and O'ReganKatherine. 2008. “Reversal of Fortunes? Lower–Income Urban Neighbourhoods in the US in the 1990s.” Urban Studies45(4):845–69.
14.
EllenIngrid Gould and O'ReganKatherine. 2011. “How Low Income Neighborhoods Change: Entry, Exit, and Enhancement.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41(2):89–97.
15.
EssokaJonathan D.2010. “The Gentrifying Effects of Brownfields Redevelopment.” The Western Journal of Black Studies34(3):299–315.
16.
FreemanLance. 2005. “Displacement or Succession?: Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review40(4):463–91.
17.
FreemanLance and BraconiFrank. 2004. “Gentrification and Displacement New York City in the 1990s.” Journal of the American Planning Association70(1):39–52.
18.
GrierGeorge and GrierEunice. 1978. Urban Displacement: A Reconnaissance. Bethesda, MD: The Grier Partnership.
19.
GuerrieriVeronica, HartleyDaniel, and HurstErik. 2013. “Endogenous Gentrification and Housing Price Dynamics.” Journal of Public Economics100:45–60.
20.
HochstenbachCody and van GentWouter PC. 2015. “An Anatomy of Gentrification Processes: Variegating Causes of Neighbourhood Change.” Environment and Planning A47(7):1480–1501.
21.
HyraDerek. 2015. “The Back–to–the–City Movement: Neighbourhood Redevelopment and Processes of Political and Cultural Displacement.” Urban Studies52(10):1753–73.
22.
MartinIsaac William and BeckKevin. 2018. “Gentrification, Property Tax Limitation, and Displacement.” Urban Affairs Review54(1):33–73.
23.
McKinnishTerra, WalshRandall, and Kirk WhiteT.2010. “Who Gentrifies Low–Income Neighborhoods?” Journal of Urban Economics67(2):180–93.
24.
NewmanKathe and WylyElvin K.2006. “The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City.” Urban Studies43(1):23–57.
25.
OngPaul et al. 2017. “Analysis of Historic Patterns of Neighborhood Change.” Pp. 45–92 in Developing a New Methodology for Analyzing Potential Displacement. California, LA: University of California, Berkeley and University of California, Los Angeles.
26.
PetticrewMark and RobertsHelen. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
27.
SmithNeil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London, UK: Routledge.
28.
SmithNeil. 1998. “Gentrification.” in The Encyclopedia of Housing, edited by VlietW.London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
29.
VigdorJacob L.2002. “Does Gentrification Harm the Poor?” Brookings–Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. Washington D.C., DC: The Brookings Institution; 133–82.
30.
WardeAlan. 1991. “Gentrification as Consumption: Issues of Class and Gender.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9(2):223–32.
31.
WylyElvin, NewmanKathe, SchafranAlex, and LeeElizabeth. 2010. “Displacing New York.” Environment and Planning A42(11):2602–23.
32.
ZukMiriam, BierbaumAriel H., ChappleKaren, GorskaKarolina, and Loukaitou–SiderisAnastasia. 2015. Gentrification, Displacement and the Role of Public Investment: A Literature Review. San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
