We model and test the relationship between social and commercial entrepreneurship drawing on social capital theory. We propose that the country prevalence rate of social entrepreneurship is an indicator of constructible nation–level social capital and enhances the likelihood of individual commercial entry. We further posit that both social and commercial entrepreneurial entry is facilitated by certain formal institutions, namely strong property rights and (low) government activism, albeit the latter impacts each of these types of entrepreneurship differently. We apply bivariate discrete choice multilevel modeling to population–representative samples in 47 countries and find support for these hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcemogluD. & JohnsonS. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 949–995.
2.
AcsZ.J., DesaiS., & KlapperL.F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show?Small Business Economics, 31, 265–281.
3.
AdlerP.S. & KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
4.
AidisR., EstrinS., & MickiewiczT. (2012). Size matters: Entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39, 119–139.
5.
AudretschD. & KeilbachM. (2004). Does entrepreneurship capital matter?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 419–429.
6.
AutioE. & AcsZ. (2010). Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(3), 234–251.
7.
BakerT., GedajlovicE., & LubatkinM. (2005). A framework for comparing entrepreneurial processes across nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 492–504.
8.
BanerjeeA. & DufloE. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
9.
BaumolW.J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
10.
BergvistL. & RossiterJ.R. (2007). The predictive validity of multi–item versus single item measures of the same construct. Journal of Marketing Research, XLIV, 175–184.
11.
BlieseP.D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S–PLUS. In DrasgowF. & SchmittN. (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 401–445). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
12.
BlieseP.D., ChanD., & PloyhartR.E. (2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10(4), 551–563.
13.
BosmaN., LevieJ., BygraveW., JustoR., LepoutreJ., & TerjesenS. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor. 2009 executive report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
14.
CarneyM., GedajlovicE., Heugens vanP.P.EssenM., & OosterhoutJ. (2012). Concentrated Owners in Asia: Contingent Performance Effects of Owner Types and Market Supporting Institutions, mimeo.
15.
DacinP.A., DacinM.A., & MatearM. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 37–57.
16.
DiDomenicoM., HaughH., & TraceyP. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 681–703.
17.
EstrinS., KorostelevaJ., & MickiewiczT. (2012). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?Journal of Business Venturing, doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001.
18.
EvansP. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence of synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119–1132.
19.
FogelK., HawkA., MorckR., & YeungB. (2006). Institutional obstacles to entrepreneurship. In CassonM., YeungB., BasuA., & WadesonN. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 540–579). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FukuyamaF. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22, 7–20.
21.
GartnerW.B. (1989). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 13(4), 47–68.
22.
GranovetterM.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
23.
HardingR. (2006). Social entrepreneurship monitor United Kingdom 2006. London: London Business School.
24.
HardingR. & CowlingM. (2004). The GEM UK social entrepreneurship monitor. London: Barclays Bank.
25.
HarperD. (2003). Foundations of entrepreneurship and economic development. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.
26.
HébertR.F. & LinkA.N. (1982). The entrepreneurs: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger.
27.
KorosecR.L. & BermanE.M. (2006). Municipal support for social entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 66, 448–462.
28.
KozlowskiS.W. & KleinK.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and reseach in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK.J. & KozlowskiS.W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
29.
KrishnaA. (2007). How does social capital grow? A seven–year study of villages in India. Journal of Politics, 69, 941–956.
30.
KwonS.–W. & AreniusP. (2010). Nations of entrepreneurs: A social capital perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 315–330.
31.
LepoutreJ., JustoR., TerjesenS., & BosmaN. (2011). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, doi:10.1007/s11187–011–9398–4.
32.
LevieJ., BrooksbankD., Jones–EvansD., HardingR., & HartM. (2006). Measuring social entrepreneurship: Lessons from three years of experimentation by the UK Global Entrepreneurship Monitor team. Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Indiana University, Bloomington.
33.
MairJ. & MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.
34.
MairJ. & MartiI. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 419–435.
35.
MairJ., MartiI., & VentrescaM.J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850.
36.
McMullenJ.S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market–based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 185–215.
37.
McMullenJ.S., BagbyD., & PalichL. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875–895.
38.
NichollsA. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre–paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 611–633.
39.
NissanE., CastañoM.S., & CarrascoI. (2012). Drivers of non–profit activity: A cross–country analysis. Small Business Economics, 38(3), 303–320.
40.
NorthD.C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 97–112.
41.
OlsonM. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Organization for Economic Co–operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Social expenditure database (SOCX). Available at http://www.oecd.org, accessed 10 January 2011.
43.
OstromE. (1994). Constituting social capital and collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(4), 527–562.
44.
ParkerS.C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
PayneG.T., MooreC.B., GriffisS.E., & AutryC.W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37, 491–520.
46.
PeredoA.M. & ChrismanJ.J. (2006). Toward a theory of community–based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31, 309–328.
47.
PloyhartR.E., HoltzB.C., & BlieseP.D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis. Applications of random coefficient modelling to leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 455–486.
48.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.
49.
PortesA. & LandoltP. (2000). Social capital: Promise and pitfalls of its role in development. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(2), 529–547.
50.
PutnamR. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
PutnamR.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
52.
Rabe–HeskethS., SkrondalA., & PicklesA. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random. Journal of Econometrics, 128(2), 301–323.
53.
RasbashJ., CharltonC., BrowneW.J., HealyM., & CameronB. (2009). MLwiN version 2.1. Bristol, U.K.: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
54.
ReynoldsP.D. (2010). New firm creation: A global assessment of national, contextual, and individual factors. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(5–6), 315–496.
55.
ReynoldsP.D., BosmaN., AutioE., HuntS., De BonoN., ServaisA., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24, 205–231.
56.
ShortJ.C., MossT.W., & LumpkinG.T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161–194.
57.
StephanU. & UhlanerL.M. (2010). Performance based vs. socially supportive culture: A cross–national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1347–1364.
58.
ThorntonP.H. (1999). The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 19–46.
Van DethJ. (2003). Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79–92.
61.
Van StelA., StoreyD., & ThurikR. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28, 171–186.
62.
WennekersS., Van StelA.J., ThurikA.R., & ReynoldsP. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.
63.
WestlundH. & AdamF. (2010). Social capital and economic performance: A meta–analysis of 65 studies. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 893–919.
64.
WilliamsonO. (2000). New institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.
65.
WoolcockM. & NarayanD. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.
66.
YunusM. (1998). Banker to the poor. London: Aurum Press.
67.
ZahraS.A., GedajlovicE., NeubaumD.O., & ShulmanJ.M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.
68.
ZahraS.A. & WrightM. (2011). Entrepreneurship's next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.
69.
ZhaoX., LynchJ.G., & ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.
