Despite an abundance of research on entrepreneurial orientation and various dimensions of firm financial performance, very little is known about the specific influence of proactiveness on performance. In the current research, we explore the role of proactiveness in firms’ interaction with the external environment. In particular, we examine the influence of proactiveness in stakeholder–firm power difference. Further, we investigate the extent to which stakeholder–firm power difference affects product safety and quality. Using a sample of 144 Chinese small– and medium–sized enterprises (SMEs), we found that proactiveness can decrease government– and media–firm power differences. Government–firm power difference reduces product concerns, yet media–firm power difference deteriorates the purported product strengths for Chinese SMEs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgleB.R., MitchellR.K., & SonnenfeldJ.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.
2.
AhlstromD. & BrutonG.D. (2002). An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology–focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 53–69.
3.
AstleyG.W. & Van de VenA.H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245–274.
4.
BaronR.A. & TangJ. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ social skills and new venture performance: Mediating mechanisms and cultural generality. Journal of Management, 35(2), 282–306.
5.
BaronR.A. & TangJ. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm–level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 49–60.
6.
BBC News. (2010, January 10). China overtakes Germany as world's largest exporter. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8450434.stm, accessed 16 September 2012.
7.
BermanS.L., WicksA.C., KothaS.K., & JonesT.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? An empirical examination of the relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.
8.
BirdR.G., HallA.D., MomenteF., & ReggianiF. (2007). What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market?Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 189–206.
9.
BoisotM. & ChildJ. (1996). From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 600–628.
10.
BourgeoisL.J.III. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573.
11.
BrislinR.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. & BerryJ. (Eds.), Handbook of cross–cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
ChenM. & HambrickD.C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482.
14.
CheungT.S. & KingA.Y. (2004). Righteousness and profitableness: The moral choices of contemporary Confucian entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 245–260.
CovinJ.G., GreenM., & SlevinD.P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81.
17.
CovinJ.G. & LumpkinG.T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–1103.
18.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.
19.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.
EdwardsJ.R. (2001). Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 265–287.
22.
EdwardsJ.R. & ParryM.E. (1993). The use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.
KnightG. (1997). Cross–cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 213–225.
LiH. & ZhangY. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 791–804.
LumpkinG.T. & DessG.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
35.
LumpkinG.T. & DessG.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.
36.
LuoY. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1315–1327.
37.
MaignanI. & RalstonD.A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self–presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514.
38.
McCarthyD.J. & PufferS.M. (2008). Interpreting the ethicality of corporate governance decisions in Russia: Utilizing integrative social contracts theory to evaluate the relevance of agency theory norms. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 11–31.
39.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.
40.
MillerD. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894.
41.
MillerD. & FriesenP.H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.
42.
MillerD. & Le Breton–MillerI. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 1051–1076.
43.
MitchellR.K., AgleB.R., & WoodD.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
44.
MonsenE. & BossR.W. (2009). The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organization: Examining job stress and employee retention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 71–104.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2009). Yearbook of Chinese small and medium size enterprises. Beijing: Economic Science Press.
47.
NeeV. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transitions: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 1–27.
48.
NeubaumD., MitchellM., & SchminkeM. (2004). Firm newness, entrepreneurial orientation, and ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 335–347.
49.
NeubaumD. & ZahraS. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effect of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 1–24.
50.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
51.
PaulhusD.L. (1984). Two–component model of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
52.
PerriniF., RussoA., & TencatiA. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285–300.
53.
PodsakoffP.M., MacKenzieS.B., PodsakoffN.P., & LeeJ. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
54.
PorterM. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.
55.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG., & FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
56.
RussoM. & FoutsP. (1997). A resource–based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
57.
RutherfordM.W., BullerP.F., & StebbinsJ.M. (2009). Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 949–964.
58.
ShaneS.A. & VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
StockmannD. (2010). Who believes propaganda? Media effects during the anti–Japanese protests in Beijing. The China Quarterly, 202(June), 269–289.
61.
StrikeV.M., GaoJ., & BansalP. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–862.
62.
SuchmanM.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
63.
SutcliffeK. (1994). What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360–1378.
64.
TanJ. (2009). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economics: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 171–189.
65.
TanJ. & PengM.W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1249–1263.
66.
TanJ. & TanD. (2005). Environment–strategy co–evolution and co–alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 141–157.
67.
TangJ., TangZ., MarinoL., ZhangY., & LiQ. (2008). Exploring an inverted U–shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239.
68.
TangZ., KreiserP., MarinoL., DicksonP., & WeaverM. (2009). A hierarchical perspective of the dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(2), 181–201.
69.
TangZ. & TangJ. (2012). Stakeholder–firm power difference, stakeholders’ CSR orientation, and SMEs’ environmental performance in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 436–455.
TonoyanV., StrohmeyerR., HabibM., & PerlitzM. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 803–832.
73.
WangC. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657.
WeaverG.R., TrevinoL.K., & CochranP.L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethical practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.
76.
WiklundJ. & ShepherdD. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71–91.
YiuD.W. & LauC.M. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship as resource capital configuration in emerging market firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 37–57.
79.
ZhaoY., LiY., LeeS., & ChenL. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 293–317.
