In this paper, we suggest that individual experience and reasoning, as applied to new endeavors in internationalization, are concepts with high potential to advance conceptual and empirical research in international entrepreneurship (IE). Experience is known to be important in internationalization, but the logic or reasoning with which it is applied is insufficiently understood. Cognitive, comparison–based reasoning theories explain how individuals draw on experience to make sense of uncertain, novel, and complex situations. Drawing on two such theories, heuristics and analogical reasoning, we delineate the logic of experience and advance speculative propositions on its utility in the context of internationalization research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezS.A. & BarneyJ.B. (2005). How entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Management, 31, 776–793.
2.
AnderssonS. (2002). Suppliers’ international strategies. European Journal of Marketing, 36(1–2), 86–110.
3.
ArdichviliA. & GasparishviliA. (2003). Russian and Georgian entrepreneurs and non–entrepreneurs: A study of value differences. Organization Studies, 24(1), 29–46.
4.
AutioE., GeorgeG., & AlexyO. (2011). International entrepreneurship and capability development—Qualitative evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 11–37.
5.
AutioE., SapienzaH.J., & AlmeidaJ.G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 909–924.
6.
BaronR.A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33, 328–340.
7.
BaronR.A. & EnsleyM.D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.
8.
BaronR.A. & HenryR.A. (2010). How entrepreneurs acquire the capacity to excel: Insights from research on expert performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 49–65.
9.
BarrettL.F., TugadeM.M., & EngleR.W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual–process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.
10.
BellJ. (1995). The internationalization of small computer software firms: A further challenge to “stage” theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29, 60–75.
11.
BinghamC.B. & EisenhardtK. (2011). Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1437–1464.
12.
BinghamC.B., EisenhardtK.M., & FurrN.R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 27–47.
13.
BirdB. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case of intention. Academy of Management Review, 13, 442–453.
14.
BloodgoodJ.M., SapienzaH.J., & AlmeidaJ.G. (1996). The internationalization of new high–potential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 61–76.
15.
BlumeB.D. & CovinJ.G. (2011). Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process: Do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say they do?Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 137–151.
16.
BoterH. & HolmquistC. (1996). Industry characteristics and internationalization processes in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 471–487.
17.
BuckleyP.J., DevinneyT.M., & LouviereJ.J. (2007). Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice–theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision–making. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 1069–1094.
18.
BurtR.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
19.
BusenitzL.W. & BarneyJ.B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision–making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.
20.
CasillasJ.C., MorenoA.M., AcedoF.J., GallegoM.A., & RamosE. (2009). An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal of World Business, 44, 311–322.
21.
CasulliL. (2011). Making internationalisation decisions: How heuristics and biases affect the reasoning processes of leaders of small and medium–sized firms (Doctoral thesis). University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
22.
ChandraY., StylesC., & WilkinsonI. (2009). The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: Evidence from firms in knowledge–based industries. International Marketing Review, 26(1), 30–61.
23.
ChristensenB.T. & SchunnC.D. (2007). The relationship between analogical distance to analogical function and pre–inventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory and Cognition, 35, 29–38.
24.
ChristiansonS.A. & LoftusE. (1990). Some characteristics of some people's traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 195–198.
25.
CoeurderoyR. & MurrayG. (2008). Regulatory environments and the location decision: Evidence from the early foreign market entries of new–technology–based firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 670–687.
26.
CornelissenJ.P. & ClarkeJ.S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35, 539–557.
27.
CovielloN.E. & MunroH.J. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6, 361–386.
28.
CrickD. (2002). The decision to discontinue exporting: SME's in two U.K. trade sectors. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 66–77.
29.
CrickD. (2004). U.K. SMEs’ decision to discontinue exporting: An exploratory investigation into practices within the clothing industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 561–587.
30.
DewN., ReadS., SarasvathyS.D., & WiltbankR. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision–making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287–309.
31.
DimitratosP., PetrouA., PlakoyiannakiE., & JohnsonJ.E. (2011). Strategic decision–making processes in internationalization: Does national culture of the focal firm matter?Journal of World Business, 46, 194–204.
32.
DimovD.P. (2007). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person–situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 561–584.
33.
EpleyN. & GilovichT. (2006). The anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311–318.
34.
EvansJ.St.B.T. (2008). Dual–processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
35.
EvansJ.St.B.T. (2012). Dual–process theories of deductive reasoning: Facts and fallacies. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 115–133). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
FernhaberS.A., GilbertB.A., & McDougallP.P. (2008). International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 267–290.
37.
FernhaberS.A. & LiD. (2013). International exposure through network relationships: Implications for new venture internationalization. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 316–334.
38.
Figueira–De–LemosF., JohansonJ., & VahlneJ.–E. (2011). Risk management in the internationalization process of the firm: A note on the Uppsala Model. Journal of World Business, 46, 143–153.
39.
FilatotchevI., LiuX., BuckT., & WrightM. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high–technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1005–1021.
40.
FischhoffB., SlovicP., & LichtensteinS. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552–564.
41.
FletcherM. & HarrisS. (2012). Knowledge acquisition for the internationalization of the smaller firm: Content and sources. International Business Review, 21, 631–647.
42.
FletcherM. & PrashanthamS. (2011). Knowledge assimilation processes of rapidly internationalising firms: Longitudinal case studies of Scottish SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18, 475–501.
43.
ForbusK.D. (2001). Exploring analogy in the large. In GentnerD., HolyoakK.J., & KokinovB.N. (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 23–58). London: The MIT Press.
44.
GavettiG., LevinthalD.A., & RivkinJ.W. (2005). Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 691–712.
45.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure–mapping: A theoretical framework. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
46.
GentnerD., HolyoakK.J., & KokinovB.N. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. London: The MIT Press.
47.
GiarratanaM.S. & TorrisiS. (2010). Foreign entry and survival in a knowledge–intensive market: Emerging economy countries’ international linkages, technology competencies, and firm experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 85–104.
48.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Gregan–PaxtonJ. & MoreauP. (2003). How do consumers transfer existing knowledge? A comparison of analogy and categorization effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 422–430.
50.
GrégoireD.A., BarrP.S., & ShepherdD.A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21, 413–431.
51.
GretherD.M. (1980). Bayes rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 537–557.
52.
GretherD.M. (1992). Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17, 31–57.
53.
GriffinD.W., GonzalezR., KoehlerD.J., & GilovichT. (2012). Judgmental heuristics: A historical overview. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 322–345). New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
GuptaV. & FernandezC. (2009). Cross–cultural similarities and differences in characteristics attributed to entrepreneurs: A three–nation study. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 304–318.
55.
HalfordG.S. (1987). A structure–mapping approach to cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 609–642.
56.
HamannS.B. (2001). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 394–400.
57.
HambrickD.C. & MasonP.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as reflection of its managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
58.
HolyoakK.J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234–259). New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (2012). Thinking and reasoning: A reader's guide. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 1–10). New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
HolyoakK.J. & ThagardP. (1996). Mental leaps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
HutchinsonK., AlexanderN., QuinnB., & DohertyA.M. (2007). Internationalization motives and facilitating factors: Qualitative evidence from smaller specialist retailers. Journal of International Marketing, 15(3), 96–122.
62.
JohansonJ. & VahlneJ.–E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.
63.
JohansonJ. & VahlneJ.–E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalisation. International Marketing Review, 7, 11–24.
64.
JonesM.V. (1999). The internationalization of small high–technology firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7, 15–41.
65.
JonesM.V., CovielloN., & TangY.K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 632–659.
66.
JonesM.V. & CovielloN.E. (2005). Internationalization: Conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 284–303.
67.
KahnemanD. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
68.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.
69.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
70.
KhatriN. & NgH.A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision–making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.
71.
KnightG.A. & CavusgilS.T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born–global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 124–141.
72.
KocakA. & AbimbolaT. (2009). The effects of entrepreneurial marketing on born global performance. International Marketing Review, 26(4–5), 439–452.
73.
KogutB. & ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.
74.
KokinovB.N. & PetrovA.A. (2001). Integrating memory and reasoning in analogy–making. In GentnerD., HolyoakK.J., & KokinovB.N. (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 59–124). London: The MIT Press.
75.
KortM.J.J. & VermeulenP.A.M. (2008). Entrepreneurial decision–makers and the use of biases and heuristics. In VermeulenP.A.M. & CurseuP.L. (Eds.), Entrepreneurial strategic decision–making: A cognitive approach (pp. 123–134). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
76.
LambP.W.L., SandbergJ., & LieschP.W. (2011). Small firm internationalisation unveiled through phenomenography. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 672–694.
77.
LindstrandA., MelénS., & NordmanE.R. (2011). Turning social capital into business: A study of the internationalization of biotech SMEs. International Business Review, 20, 194–212.
78.
LoewensteinJ. (2012). Thinking in business. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 755–773). New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
LussierR.N. & PfeiferS. (2000). A comparison of business success versus failure variables between U.S. and Central Eastern Europe Croatian entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(4), 60–67.
80.
MadsenT.K. & ServaisP. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process?International Business Review, 6, 561–583.
81.
MarkmanA.B. & MoreauC.P. (2001). Analogy and analogical comparison in choice. In GentnerD., HolyoakK.J., & KokinovB.N. (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 363–400). London: The MIT Press.
82.
McDougallP.P. & OviattB.M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 902–906.
83.
McDougallP.P., ShaneS., & OviattB.M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 469–487.
84.
McGaugheyS.L. (2007). Hidden ties in international new venturing: The case of portfolio entrepreneurship. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 307–321.
85.
McGrathR.G. & MacMillanI.C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross–cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 419–429.
86.
MeulemanM. & WrightM. (2011). Cross–border private equity syndication: Institutional context and learning. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 35–48.
87.
MichailovaS. & WilsonH.I. (2008). Small firm internationalization through experiential learning: The moderating role of socialization tactics. Journal of World Business, 43, 243–254.
88.
MitchellR.K., SmithJ.B., MorseE.A., SeawrightK.W., PeredoA.M., & McKenzieB. (2002). Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 9–32.
89.
MitchellR.K., SmithB., & SeawrightK.W. (2000). Cross–cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 974–993.
90.
MorrisM.H., KuratkoD.F., SchindehutteM., & SpivakA.J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 11–40.
91.
MudambiR. & ZahraS.A. (2007). The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 333–352.
92.
NersessianN.J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93.
NielsenB.B. & NielsenS. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision–making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46, 185–193.
94.
OviattB.M., MaksimovV.R., & McDougallP.P. (2011). International entrepreneurship. In DanaL.P. (Ed.), World encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 268–273). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
95.
OviattB.M. & McDougallP.P. (1994). Towards a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 45–64.
96.
OviattB.M. & McDougallP.P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 537–553.
97.
PerksK.J. & HughesM. (2008). Entrepreneurial decision–making in internationalization: Propositions from mid–size firms. International Business Review, 17(3), 310–330.
98.
ReuberA.R. (1997). Management experience and management expertise. Decision Support Systems, 21, 51–60.
99.
ReuberA.R. & FischerE. (1997). The influence of the management team's international experience on the internationalisation behaviors of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 807–825.
100.
ReuberA.R. & FischerE. (2002). Foreign sales and small firm growth: The moderating role of the management team. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 29–45.
101.
RuzzierM., AntoncicB., HisrichR.D., & KonecnikM. (2007). Human capital and SME internationalization: A structural equation modeling study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(1), 15–29.
102.
SarasvathyS.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.
103.
SarasvathyS.D. (2004). Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 519–531.
104.
SchacterD.L. (1996). Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.
105.
SchertlerA. & TykvováT. (2011). Venture capital and internationalization. International Business Review, 20, 423–439.
106.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107.
SchwarzN., BlessH., StrackF., KlumppG., Rittenauer–SchatkaH., & SimonsA. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
108.
SchwensC. & KabstR. (2009). How early opposed to late internationalisers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review, 18, 509–522.
109.
SchwensC. & KabstR. (2011). Internationalization of young technology firms: A complementary perspective on antecedents of foreign market familiarity. International Business Review, 20, 60–74.
110.
ShaneS. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.
111.
SimonH.A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuireC.B. & RadnerR. (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 161–176). Amsterdam: North Holland.
112.
SmithS.M. & WardT.B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In HolyoakK.J. & MorrisonR.G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). New York: Oxford University Press.
113.
SommerL. & HaugM. (2011). Intention as a cognitive antecedent to international entrepreneurship—Understanding the moderating roles of knowledge and experience. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 111–142.
114.
StanovichK.E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
115.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
116.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
117.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
118.
WelchC.L. & WelchL.S. (2009). Re–internationalisation: Exploration and conceptualisation. International Business Review, 18, 567–577.
119.
ZahraS.A., KorriJ.S., & YuJ. (2005). Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. International Business Review, 14, 129–146.
120.
ZhengC., KhavulS., & CrockettD. (2012). Does it transfer? The effects of pre–internationalization experience on post–entry organizational learning in entrepreneurial Chinese firms. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10, 232–254.
