International entrepreneurship research maintains that firms with strong entrepreneurial orientations expand to international markets to enhance performance. Yet these firms can suffer from resource constraints as they move abroad. To alleviate this problem, previous research has suggested participation in strategic alliances. We developed and tested a theoretical perspective that merged these ideas, maintaining that firm–level entrepreneurial orientation is associated with higher international performance both directly and in combination with participation in foreign market research or marketing alliances. Based on surveys of U.S. and U.K. firms, our findings indicate that small and medium–sized enterprises (SMEs) have higher international performance when they possess greater entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and when the type of alliance (research or marketing) used is aligned with the capabilities of the firm. Further we find that participating in alliances strengthens the relation between EO and international performance. These results have important implications for managers and policy makers interested in improving SME international performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhujaG. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317–343.
AllredB.B. & SwanK.S. (2004). Global versus multidomestic: Culture's consequences on innovation. Management International Review, 44(1), 81–105.
4.
AlvarezS.A. & BusenitzL.W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource–based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.
5.
AutioE., GeorgeG., & AlexyO. (2011). International entrepreneurship and capability development—qualitative evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 11–37.
6.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
7.
BaronR.M. & KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
8.
BerryH., GuillénM.F., & ZhouN. (2010). An institutional approach to cross–national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.
9.
BerthonP., EwingM.T., & NapoliJ. (2008). Brand management in small to medium–sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 27–45.
10.
BrouthersL., NakosG., HadjimarcouJ., & BrouthersK.D. (2009). Key factors for successful export performance for small firms. Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 21–38.
11.
Cegarra–NavarroJ. (2005). An empirical investigation of organizational learning through strategic alliances between SMEs. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(1), 3–16.
12.
ChenH.L. & HuangY. (2004). The establishment of global marketing strategic alliances by small and medium enterprises. Small Business Economics, 22(5), 365–377.
13.
CovinJ. & SlevinD. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
14.
CovinJ. & SlevinD. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–26.
15.
De ClercqD., SapienzaH.J., & CrijnsH. (2005). The internationalization of small and medium–sized firms. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 409–419.
16.
DenkN., KaufmannL., & RoeschJ.F. (2012). Liabilities of foreignness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18, 322–334.
17.
DimitratosP., LioukasS., & CarterS. (2004). The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment. International Business Review, 13, 19–41.
18.
DollingerM. & GoldenP. (1992). Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environmental effects and performance. Journal of Management, 18(4), 695–715.
GhoshalS. & NohriaN. (1993). Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 23–23.
21.
HeX., BrouthersK.D., & FilatotchevI. (2013). Resource–based and institutional perspectives on export channel selection and export performance. Journal of Management, 39(1), 27–47.
22.
HillmanA.J., WithersM.C., & CollinsB.J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
23.
HittM., AhlstromD., DacinT., LevitasE., & SvobodinaL. (2004). The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2), 173–185.
24.
HoangH. & AntoncicB. (2003). Network–based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
25.
HultG.T.M., KetchenD.J., GriffithD.A., ChabowskiB.R., HammanM.K., DykesB.J., et al. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1064–1080.
26.
InkpenA.C. & BeamishP..W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.
27.
JantunenA., PuumalainenK., SaarenketoS., & KylaheikoK. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223–243.
28.
KeuppM.M. & GassmannO. (2009). The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management, 35(3), 600–633.
29.
KnightG. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12–32.
30.
KotabeM., SrinivasanS., & AulakhP. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79–97.
31.
LassarW.M. & KerrJ.L. (1996). Strategy and control in supplier distributor relationships: An agency perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 17(8), 613–632.
32.
LeeC., LeeK., & PenningsJ.M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology–based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 615–640.
33.
LuJ. & BeamishP. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 565–586.
34.
LumpkinG. & DessG. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
35.
MarinoL., StrandholmK., SteensmaH.K., & WeaverM. (2002). The moderating effect of national culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 145–160.
36.
MartinX. & SalomonR. (2003). Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 356–373.
37.
MilesG., PreeceS.B., & BaetzM.C. (1999). Dangers of dependence: The impact of strategic alliance use by small technology–based firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(2), 20–29.
38.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
39.
MintzbergH. (1988). Generic strategies: Toward a comprehensive framework. In LambR. & ShrivastavaP. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 5, pp. 1–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
MurrayJ.Y., GaoG.Y., & KotabeM. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 252–269.
42.
NakosG., BrouthersK.D., & BrouthersL.E. (1998). The impact of firm and managerial characteristics on small and medium–sized Greek firms’ export performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 11(4), 23–47.
43.
NeterJ., WassermanW., & KutnerM. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
44.
PodsakoffP.M., MacKenzieS.B., LeeJ.–Y., & PodsakoffN.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
45.
RanganS. (1998). Do multinationals operate flexibly? Theory and evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 217–237.
46.
RauchA., WiklundJ., LumpkinG.T., & FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
47.
SapienzaH., AutioE., GeorgeG., & ZahraS.A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.
48.
SohP. (2003). The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 727–744.
49.
SongM., DrogeC., HanvanichS., & CalantoneR. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 259–276.
50.
StreetC.T. & CameronA.F. (2007). External relationships and the small business: A review of small business alliance and network research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 239–266.
51.
SwaminathanV. & MoormanC. (2009). Marketing alliances, firm networks, and firm value creation. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 52–69.
52.
TengB. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource–based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 119–142.
53.
WiklundJ. & ShepherdD. (2003). Knowledge–based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium–sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.
54.
YuJ., GilbertB., & OviattB. (2011). Effects of alliances, time and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 424–446.
55.
ZaheerS. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.
56.
ZaheerS. & MosakowskiE. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 439–464.
57.
ZahraS. & GeorgeG. (2002). International entrepreneurship: The current status of the field and future research agenda. In HittM.A., IrelandR.D., CampS.D., & SextonD.L. (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 255–288). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
ZahraS.A. & GarvisD.M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 469–492.
