In making a decision to enter into a long–term employment relationship with a firm, job seekers often compare their needs and values with the perceived organizational characteristics of the firm. In the case of family firms, the communication of family influence can be a unique factor in shaping beliefs about firm attributes. Family influence is often associated with trustworthiness, security, and stability. However, family influence is also associated with inflexibility and resistance to change. Using the idea of person–organization fit, we hypothesize that although family influence attracts job seekers in general, applicants who value conservation or self–transcendence are particularly attracted, while applicants who emphasize openness to change or self–enhancement are less attracted. Furthermore, we propose that the attractive effects of family influence are more pronounced in more hostile economic environments. We find evidence for our hypotheses using a conjoint experiment and 5,600 assessments of family influence nested within 175 job seekers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiman–SmithL., BauerT.N., & CableD.M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy–capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 219–237.
2.
AlderferC.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: The Free Press.
3.
AstrachanJ.H., KleinS.B., & SmyrniosK.X. (2002). The F–PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45–58.
4.
BardiA., CalogeroR.M., & MullenB. (2008). A new archival approach to the study of values and value–behavior relations: Validation of the value lexicon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 483–497.
5.
BerroneP., CruzC.C., Gómez–MejíaL.R., & Larraza KintanaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family–controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
6.
BinzC., HairJ.F.Jr., PieperT.M., & BaldaufA. (2013). Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(1), 3–11.
7.
BlockJ. (2010). Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23(2), 109–130.
8.
BoswellW.R., ZimmermanR.D., & SwiderB.W. (2012). Employee job search: Toward an understanding of search context and search objectives. Journal of Management, 38, 129–163.
9.
BreaughJ.A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 103–118.
10.
BreaughJ.A. & StarkeM. (2000). Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 26(3), 405–434.
11.
BretzR.D. & JudgeT.A. (1994). Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(1), 32–54.
12.
BrownD.J., CoberR.T., KaneK., LevyP.E., & ShalhoopJ. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: A field investigation with college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 717–726.
13.
BrownT.R. (1972). A comparison of judgmental policy equations obtained from human judges under natural and contrived conditions. Mathematics Bioscience, 15(3–4), 205–230.
14.
BudaR. & CharnovB.H. (2003). Message processing in realistic recruitment practices. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15, 302–316.
15.
CableD.M., Aiman–SmithL., MulveyP.W., & EdwardsJ.R. (2000). The sources and accuracy of job applicants’ beliefs about organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1076–1085.
16.
CableD.M. & JudgeT.A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person–organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47(2), 317–348.
17.
CableD.M. & JudgeT.A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.
18.
CableD.M. & YuK.Y. (2006). Managing job seekers’ organizational image beliefs: The role of media richness and media credibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 828–840.
19.
CacioppoJ.T., PettyR.E., & MorrisK.J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818.
20.
CarnevaleP. & LedgerwoodA. (2005). Identity rivalry and the group endowment effect. Paper presented at the IACM 18th Annual Conference, Seville, Spain.
21.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–266.
22.
CarriganM. & BuckleyJ. (2008). “What's so special about family business?” An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(6), 656–666.
23.
ChapmanD.S., UggerslevK.L., CarrollS.A., PiasentinK.A., & JonesD.A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta–analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944.
24.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & KellermannsF.W. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and non–family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739–760.
25.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., PearsonA.W., & BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293.
26.
ChrismanJ.J., MemiliE., & MisraK. (2014). Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner's curse: The influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1103–1127.
27.
ChrzanK. (1994). Three kinds of order effects in choice–based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5(2), 165–172.
28.
ColomboM.G., De MassisA., PivaE., Rossi–LamastraC., & WrightM. (2014). Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high–tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 226–245.
29.
CooperM.J., UptonN., & SeamanS. (2005). Customer relationship management: A comparative analysis of family and nonfamily business perspectives. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(3), 242–256.
30.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 35–37.
31.
CovinT.J. (1994). Perceptions of family–owned firms: The impact of gender and educational level. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(3), 29–35.
32.
CraigJ., DibbrellC., & DavisP.S. (2008). Leveraging family–based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 351–371.
33.
De ClercqS., FontaineJ.R., & AnseelF. (2008). In search of a comprehensive value model for assessing supplementary person–organization fit. Journal of Psychology, 142(3), 277–302.
34.
DeTienneD.R. & ChandlerG.N. (2007). The role of gender in opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 365–386.
35.
DistelbergB. & SorensonR.L. (2009). Updating systems concepts in family businesses—A focus on values, resource flows, and adaptability. Family Business Review, 22(1), 65–81.
36.
DuttonJ.E., DukerichJ.M., & HarquailC.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
37.
DyerW.G. & MortensenS.P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and family business in a hostile environment: The case of Lithuania. Family Business Review, 18(3), 247–258.
38.
DyerW.G.Jr. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.
39.
EddlestonK., KellermannsF.W., & SarathyR. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50.
40.
EdwardsJ.R. & CableD.M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654–677.
41.
EgriC.P. & HermanS. (2000). Leadership in North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604.
42.
FeatherN.T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151.
43.
FischhoffB. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In KahnemanD., SlovicP., & TverskyA. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 335–351). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
GalloM.A. & VilasecaA. (1996). Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9(4), 387–401.
45.
GarsonG.D. (2013). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Gómez–MejíaL.R., CruzC., BerroneP., & DeCastroJ. (2012). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 1–79.
47.
Gómez–MejíaL.R., HaynesK.T., Núñez–NickelM., JacobsonK.J.L., & Moyano–FuentesH. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family–controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
48.
HabbershonT.G. & WilliamsM. (1999). A resource–based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25.
49.
HahnG.J. & ShapiroS.S. (1966). A catalog and computer program for the design and analysis of othogonal symmetric and asymmetric fractional factorial experiments. Schenectady, NY: General Electric Research and Development Center.
50.
HammondK.R. & AdelmanL. (1976). Science, values, and human judgment. Science, 194(4263), 389–397.
51.
HauswaldH. & HackA. (2013). Impact of family control/influence on stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence. Family Business Review, 26(4), 356–373.
52.
HaynieJ.M., ShepherdD.A., & McMullenJ.S. (2009). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 337–361.
53.
HofmannD.A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.
54.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
55.
Holcombe EhrhartK. & ZiegertJ.C. (2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations?Journal of Management, 31(6), 901–919.
56.
HollandD.V. & ShepherdD.A. (2011). Deciding to persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 331–358.
57.
InglehartR.F. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post–industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.
58.
InglehartR.F. (2008). Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 130–146.
59.
JudgeT.A. & BretzR.D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 261–271.
60.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1977). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.
61.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
62.
KauselE.E. & SlaughterJ.E. (2011). Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 3–14.
KellermannsF.W. & EddlestonK. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228.
65.
KidwellR.E., KellermannsF.W., & EddlestonK.A. (2012). Harmony, justice, confusion and conflict in family firms: Implications for ethical climate and the “Fredo effect”. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 175–184.
66.
KleinS.B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 13, 157–181.
67.
KleinS.B., AstrachanJ.H., & SmyrniosK.X. (2005). The F–PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339.
68.
KraiczyN.D., HackA., & KellermannsF.W. (2014). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk–taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, doi:10.1111/jpim.12203.
69.
KrappeA., GoutasL., & von SchlippeA. (2011). The “family business brand”: An enquiry into the construction of the image of family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 37–46.
70.
KristofA.L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.
71.
KutnerM.H., NachtsheimC.J., & NeterJ. (2004). Applied linear regression models (4th ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill/Irwin.
72.
Le Breton–MillerI. & MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientation, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731–746.
73.
LievensF. & HighhouseS. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75–102.
74.
LingY. & KellermannsF. (2010). The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 322–344.
LubatkinM.H., SchulzeW.S., LingY., & DinoR.N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family–managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 313–330.
77.
MacanT.H. & DipboyeR.L. (1990). The relationship of interviewers’ preinterview impressions to selection and recruitment outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 43(4), 745–768.
78.
MarchJ.G. & ShapiraZ. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.
79.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
80.
McKnightD.H., CummingsL.L., & ChervanyN.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.
81.
MicelottaE.R. & RaynardM. (2011). Concealing or revealing brand identity strategies. Family Business Review, 20(1), 1–20.
82.
MitchellJ.R. & ShepherdD.A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 138–154.
83.
MöllerJ. (2010). The German labor market response in the world recession—de–mystifying a miracle. Journal for Labour Market Research, 42(4), 325–336.
84.
MonsenE., PatzeltH., & SaxtonT. (2010). Beyond simple utility: Incentive design and trade–offs for corporate employee–entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 105–130.
85.
MorrisM.W., WilliamsK.Y., KwokL., LarrickR., MendozaM.T., BhatnagarD., et al. (1998). Conflict management style: Accounting for cross–national differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 729–747.
86.
NaldiL., NordqvistM., SjobergK., & WiklundJ. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33–47.
87.
OlsonP.D., ZuikerV.S., DanesS.M., StaffordK., HeckR.K., & DuncanK.A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639–666.
88.
OrthU.R. & GreenM.T. (2009). Consumer loyalty to family versus non–family business: The roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 248–259.
89.
PatzeltH. & ShepherdD.A. (2008). The decision to persist with underperforming alliances: The role of trust and control. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1217–1243.
90.
RaudenbushS.W. & BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
91.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
92.
RynesS.L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice and post–hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In DunnetteM.D. & HoughL.M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 399–444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
93.
RynesS.L. & BarberA.E. (1990). Applicant attraction strategies: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 286–310.
94.
SaksA.M. & AshforthB.E. (2002). Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 646–654.
95.
SchreursB., DruartC., ProostK., & WitteK.D. (2009). Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: The moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 35–46.
96.
SchwartzS.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.
97.
SharmaP. (2004). On overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.
98.
SharmaP. & ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestment in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(3), 293–312.
99.
SirmonD.G. & HittM.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
100.
TurbanD.B. & CableD.M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733–751.
101.
TurbanD.B. & KeonT.L. (1993). Organization attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–193.
102.
WalkerH.J., FieldH.S., GilesW.F., BernerthJ.B., & ShortJ.C. (2011). So what do you think of the organization? A contextual priming explanation for recruitment Web site characteristics as antecedents of job seekers’ organizational image perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 165–178.
103.
WestheadP. & CowlingM. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 31–56.
104.
YoungM.N., PengM.W., AhlstromD., BrutonG.D., & JiangY. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220.
105.
ZellwegerT., KellermannsF.W., EddlestonK., & MemiliE. (2012). Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their family ties. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 239–250.
106.
ZellwegerT., SiegerP., & HalterF. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 521–536.
107.
ZellwegerT.M., EddlestonK.A., & KellermannsF.W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63.
108.
ZellwegerT.M., KellermannsF.W., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.
109.
ZimmermanR.D., BoswellW.R., ShippA.J., DunfordB.B., & BourdreauJ.W. (2012). Explaining the pathways between approach–avoidance personality traits and employees’ job search behavior. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1450–1475.
