Randomized,Multicenter,Comparative Study of NEURO versus CIMT in Poststroke Patients with Upper Limb Hemiparesis: The NEURO-VERIFY Study

Abstract

Background

Many poststroke patients suffer functional motor limitation of the affected upper limb, which is associated with diminished health-related quality of life.

Aims

The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized, multicenter, comparative study of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive occupational therapy, NEURO (NovEl intervention Using Repetitive TMS and intensive Occupational therapy) versus constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis.

Methods

In this randomized controlled study of NEURO and constraint-induced movement therapy, 66 poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis were randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus occupational therapy (NEURO group) or constraint-induced movement therapy (constraint-induced movement therapy group) for 15 days. Fugl–Meyer Assessment and Wolf Motor Function Test and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were used for assessment.

Results

No differences in patients' characteristics were found between the two groups at baseline. The Fugl–Meyer Assessment score was significantly higher in both groups after the 15-day treatment compared with the baseline. Changes in Fugl–Meyer Assessment scores and Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test were significantly higher in the NEURO group than in the constraint-induced movement therapy group, whereas the decrease in the Wolf Motor Function Test log performance time was comparable between the two groups (changes in Fugl–Meyer Assessment score, NEURO: 5·39 ± 4·28, constraint-induced movement therapy: 3·09 ± 4·50 points; mean ± standard error of the mean; P < 0·05) (changes in Functional Ability Score of Wolf Motor Function Test, NEURO: 3·98 ± 2·99, constraint-induced movement therapy: 2·09 ± 2·96 points; P < 0·05).

Conclusions

The results of the 15-day rehabilitative protocol showed the superiority of NEURO relative to constraint-induced movement therapy; NEURO improved the motion of the whole upper limb and resulted in functional improvement in activities of daily living.

Keywords

constraint-induced movement therapy occupational therapy randomized controlled trial repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation stroke upper limb hemiparesis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wolf

Winstein

Miller

. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095–104.

Nichols-Larsen

Clark

Zeringue

Greenspan

Blanton

. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005; 36: 1480–4.

Taub

Miller

Novack

. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347–54.

Kunkel

Kopp

Müller

. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 624–8.

Miltner

Bauder

Sommer

Dettmers

Taub

. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586–92.

Page

Levine

Sisto

Bond

Johnston

. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 55–60.

Kakuda

Abo

Kobayashi

. Baseline severity of upper limb hemiparesis influences the outcome of low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy in patients who have had a stroke. PMR 2011; 3: 516–22.

Kakuda

Abo

Shimizu

. A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 4.

Wassermann

. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108: 1–16.

10.

Gladstone

Danells

Black

. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232–40.

11.

Platz

Pirkowski

Van Wijck

Kim

Di Bella

Johnson

. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, action research arm test and box and block test: A multicenter study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 404–11.

12.

Morris

Uswatte

Crago

Cook

Taub

. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 750–55.

13.

Wolf

Catlin

Ellis

Archer

Morgan

Piacentino

. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 1635–39.

14.

Yamada

Kakuda

Senoo

. Functional cortical reorganization after low-frequency repetitive TMS plus intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis: Evaluation by functional MRI in poststroke patients. Int J Stroke 2013; In press.

15.

Dong

Dobkin

Cen

Winstein

. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1552–5.

16.

Kakuda

Abo

Kobayashi

. Anti-spastic effect of low-frequency rTMS applied with occupational therapy in post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis. Brain Injury 2011; 25: 496–502.

17.

Kondo

Kakuda

Yamada

Shimizu

Hagino

Abo

. Effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor neuron excitability after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2013; 127: 26–30.