This article builds on the notion that immigrants’ integration into the labor market benefits migrants and shapes natives’ opinions about immigrants. Using insights from the newest literature on labor immigration and drawing upon the literature on attitudes toward immigrants, the article explores in a multilevel design the impact that regulations in the EU member states concerning immigrants’ access to domestic labor markets have on threat perceptions and on opinions about immigrants’ economic role. It finds that labor market regulations have a positive effect on opinions about immigrants’ economic role and reduce the negative relationships between precarious labor market status and opinions about the economic role. However, a robust effect of labor market regulations on threat perceptions was not found. Our results imply that labor market incorporation rules need to be accompanied by other measures to close the gap between natives and immigrants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W.2000“The Nature of Prejudice.” In Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings. Ed. StangorC.Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis. Pp. 20–48.
2.
BensonR.2002“The Political/Literary Model of French Journalism: Change and Continuity in Immigration News Coverage, 1973–1991.”Journal of European Area Studies10(1): 49–70.
3.
BoeriT.2010“Immigration to the Land of Redistribution.”Economica77(308): 651–687.
4.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J., and MuthénB.1989“Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance.”Psychological Bulletin105(3): 456–466.
5.
CastlesS.1995“How Nation-States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies21(3): 293–308.
6.
CaviedesA.2004“The Open Method of co-Ordination in Immigration Policy: A Tool for Prying Open Fortress Europe?”Journal of European Public Policy11(2): 289–310.
7.
CaviedesA.2010Prying Open Fortress Europe: The Turn to Sectoral Labour Migration.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
8.
CeobanuA. M., and EscandrellX.2008“East is West? National Feelings and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Europe.”Social Science Research37: 1147–1170.
9.
CernyP. G.1997“Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization.”Government and Opposition32(2): 251–274.
10.
CEU2004Immigrant Integration Policy in the European Union.Brussels: Council of the European Union, 14615/04 (Presse 321).
11.
ChellarajG.MaskusK. E., and MattooA.2006“Skilled Immigrants, Higher Education and U.S. Innovation.” In International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain. Ed. Çaglar ÖzdenM. S.Washington DC: World Bank and Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 245–260.
12.
CitrinJ., and SidesJ.2008“Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States.”Political Studies56(1): 33–56.
13.
CitrinJ., and SidesJ.GreenD. P.MusteC., and WongC.1997“Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.”Journal of Politics59: 858–881.
14.
ClarkJ. A., and LeggeJ. S.Jr.1997“Economics, Racism and Attitudes Toward Immigration in the new Germany.”Political Research Quarterly50(4): 901–917.
15.
CoendersM.LubbersM., and ScheepersP.2008“Support for Repatriation Policies of Migrants: Comparisons Across and Explanations for European Countries.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(2-3): 175–194.
16.
CohenS.2001Immigration Controls, the Family and the Welfare State.London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
17.
ConstantA., and ZimmermannK. F.2006“The Making of Entrepreneurs in Germany: Are Native men and Immigrants Alike?”Small Business Economics26(3): 279–300.
18.
CrepazM. M. L., and DamronR.2009“Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes About Immigrants.”Comparative Political Studies42(3): 437–463.
19.
DeWindJ., and KasinitzP.1997“Everything old is new Again? Processes and Theories of Immigrant Incorporation.”International Migration Review31(4): 1096–1111.
20.
European Commission (EC)2005a Green Paper on an EU Approach to Managing Economic Migration. COM(2004) 811 final. Brussels: European Commission.
21.
European Commission (EC)2005b Communication From the Commission. Policy Plan on Legal Migration. COM(2005) 669 final. Brussels: European Commission.
22.
European Commission (EC)2009The Role of NGOs and Trade Unions in Combating Discrimination. European Commission.Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
23.
European Commission (EC)2011Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Annual Report on Immigration and Asylum (2010). COM(2011) 291 final. Brussels: European Commission.
24.
EmmeneggerP., and CarejaR.2012“From Dilemma to Dualisation: Social and Migration Policies in the ‘Reluctant Countries of Immigration’.” In The age of Dualization: Structures, Policies, Politics, and Divided Outcomes. Eds. HäusermannS.EmmeneggerP.PalierB., and Seeleib-KaiserM.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 124–149.
EntzingerH.2000“The Dynamics of Integration Policies: A Multidimensional Model.” In Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics. Eds. KoopmansR., and StathamP.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 97–118.
27.
EntzingerH., and BiezeveldR.2003Benchmarking in Immigrant Integration. Report written for the European Commission.
28.
European Research Center on Migration and Ethnic Relations (ERCOMER)2002Racism and cultural diversity in the mass-media. An overview of research and examples of good practice in the EU Member States, 1995–2000. Report by European Research Center on Migration and Ethnic Relations.
29.
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)2005Towards a pro-active EU policy on migration and integration. ETUC response to the Commission's Green Paper on a EU approach to managing economic migration. Resolution adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee in their meeting held in Brussels on 15–16 March 2005. http://www.etuc.org/1159. Accessed on March 24, 2012.
30.
FarréL.GonzálezL., and OrtegaF.2011“Immigration, Family Responsibilities and the Labor Supply of Skilled Native Women. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy11(1): 1–46.
31.
FreemanG. P.1995“Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.”International Migration Review29(4): 881–902.
32.
FreemanG. P.2004“Immigrant Incorporation in Western Democracies.”International Migration Review38(3): 945–969.
GabelM. J., and ScheveK.2007“Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.”American Journal of Political Science51(4): 1013–1028.
35.
GeddesA.2003The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe.Los Angeles: Sage.
GreenwaldA. C.1968“Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change.” In Psychological Foundation of Attitudes. Ed. GreenwaldA.BrockT. C., and OstromT. M.New York, NY: Academic Press. Pp. 147–170.
39.
HainmuellerJ., and HiscoxM. J.2007“Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe.”International Organization61(2): 399–442.
40.
HamiltonD. L.ShermanS. J., and RuvoloC. M.1990“Stereotype-Based Expectancies: Effects on Information Processing and Social Behaviour.”Journal of Social Issues46(2): 35–60.
41.
HayesB. C., and DowdsL.2006“Social Contact, Cultural Marginality or Economic Self-interest? Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Northern Ireland.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(3): 455–476.
42.
HeckmannF., and SchnapperD. (eds.) 2003The Integration of Immigrants in European Societies: National Divergences and Trends of Convergence.Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
43.
HillM., and AugoustinosM.2001“Stereotype Change and Prejudice Reduction: Short- and Long-Term Evaluations of a Cross-Cultural Awareness Programme.”Journal of Community and Applied Psychology11: 243–262.
44.
HjermM.2007“Do Numbers Really Count? Group Threat Theory Revisited.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies33(8): 1253–1275.
IngramH., and SchneiderA.1993“Constructing Citizenship: The Subtle Messages of Policy Design”. In Public Policy for Democracy. Ed. IngramH. M., and SmithS. R.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press, Pp. 68–98.
50.
JoppkeC.2001“The Legal-Domestic Sources of Immigrant Rights: The United States, Germany, and the European Union.”Comparative Political Studies34(4): 339–366.
51.
JoppkeC.2007“Transformation of Immigrant Integration. Civic Integration and Antidiscrimination in the Netherlands, France and Germany.”World Politics59: 243–273.
52.
KehrbergJ. E.2007“Public Opinion on Immigration in Western Europe: Economics, Tolerance, and Exposure.”Comparative European Politics5: 264–281.
53.
KöppeO.2003“The Leviathan of Competitiveness: How and why do Liberal States (not) Accept Unwanted Immigration?”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies29(3): 431–448.
54.
KoracM.2003“Integration and how we Facilitate it: A Comparative Study of the Settlement Experiences of Refugees in Italy and the Netherlands.”Sociology37(1): 51–68.
55.
KringsT.2010“Trade Unions and Migrant Labor in the “Global Age”: New Alliances or old Antagonisms?” In Labor Migration in Europe. Ed. MenzG., and CaviedesA.Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, Hampshire. Pp. 101–125.
56.
KunovichR. M.2004“Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differences in Regression Slopes.”Social Science Research33: 20–44.
57.
LaurenceJ.2005“From the Élysée Salon to the Table of the Republic: State-Islam Relations and the Integration of Muslims in France.”French Politics, Culture and Society23(1): 37–64.
58.
MarthalerS.2008“Nicolas Sarkozy and the Politics of French Immigration Policy.”Journal of European Public Policy15(3): 382–397.
59.
MaydaA. M.2006“Who is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes Towards Immigrants.”The Review of Economics and Statistics88(3): 510–530.
60.
McLarenL. M.2001“Immigration and the new Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the European Union: The Effect of Elites and the EU on Individual-Level Opinions Regarding European and non-European Immigrants.”European Journal of Political Research39(1): 81–108.
MenzG.2009The Political Economy of Managed Migration: The Role of Unions, Employers, and non-Governmental Organizations in a Europeanized Policy Domain.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
MenzG.2010“Employers, Trade Unions, Varieties of Capitalism and Labour Migration Policies.” In Labor Migration in Europe. Eds. MenzG., and CaviedesA.Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke. Pp. 25–53.
64.
MenzG.2011Framing competitiveness: The advocacy of articulating migration as a human resources strategy. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Boston, March 3–5.
65.
MenzG., and CaviedesA. (eds.) 2010Labor Migration in Europe.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
Metz-GöckelS.MorokvasicM., and MünstA. S. (eds.) 2008Migration and Mobility in an Enlarged Europe. A Gender Perspective.Opladen, DE and Farmington Hills, USA: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
67.
MeulemanB.2009The Influence of Macro-Sociological Factors on Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. A Cross-Cultural and Contextual Approach. Mimeo. PhD thesis submitted at Faculty of Social Sciences, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven.
68.
MeulemanB.DavidovE., and BillietJ.2009“Changing Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A Dynamic Group Conflict Theory Approach.”Social Science Research38: 352–365.
69.
MonteithM. J.DeneenN. E., and ToomanG. D.1996“The Effect of Social Norm Activation on the Expression of Opinions Concerning gay men and Blacks.”Basic and Applied Social Psychology18(3): 267–288.
70.
NiessenJ.HuddlestonT., and CitronL.2007Migrant Integration Policy Index.Brussels: British Council and Migration Policy Group.
71.
van OorschotW.2006“Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions Among Citizens of European Welfare States.”Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 23–42.
72.
PettigrewT. F.1998“Intergroup Contact Theory.”Annual Review of Psychology49: 65–85.
73.
PeuckerM.2006Equality and anti-discrimination approaches in Germany. Paper prepared for the Project “Anti-discrimination approaches in Central Europe”. Vienna/Bamberg
74.
PioreM. J.1979Birds of Passage. Migrant Labour and Industrial Societies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
PiurkoY.SchwartzS. H., and DavidovE.2011“Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left-Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries.”Political Psychology32(4): 537–561.
76.
PortesA., and BöröczJ.1989“Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical Perspectives on its Determinants and Modes of Incorporation.”International Migration Review23(3): 606–630.
77.
QuillianL.1995“Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.”American Sociological Review60(1): 586–611.
78.
RustenbachE.2010“Sources of Negative Attitudes Toward Immigrants in Europe: A Multi-Level Analysis.”International Migration Review44(1): 53–77.
79.
ScheepersP.GijbertsM., and CoendersM.2002“Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat.”European Sociological Review18(1): 17–34.
80.
SchlüterE.MeulemanB., and DavidovE.2012Immigrant Integration Policies and Perceived Group Threat: A Cross-National Study of 27 Western and Eastern European Countries.University of Cologne: Unpublished paper.
81.
SchmidtV.2001“The Politics of Economic Adjustment in France and Britain: When Does Discourse Matter?”Journal of European Public Policy8(2): 247–264.
82.
SemyonovM.RaijmanR., and GorodzeiskyA.2006“The Rise of Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in European Societies, 1988–2000.”American Sociological Review71(3): 426–449.
83.
SidesJ., and CitrinJ.2007“European Attitudes toward Immigration: The Role of Interests, Identities, and Information.”British Journal of Political Science37(3): 477–504.
84.
SnijdersT. A. B., and BoskerR. J.2011Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
85.
SoysalY. N.1994Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
StangorC. (ed.) 2000Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings.Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
87.
StarkD., and BrusztL.1998Postsocialist Pathways. Transformation of Politics and Property in Central and Eastern Europe.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88.
ThränhardtD.1995“The Political Uses of Xenophobia in England, France and Germany.”Party Politics1(3): 323–345.
89.
WeldonS. A.2006“The Institutional Context of Tolerance for Ethnic Minorities: A Comparative, Multilevel Analysis of Western Europe.”American Journal of Political Science50(2): 331–349.
90.
WilliamsA.KingR., and WarnesT.1997“A Place in the sun: International Retirement Migration From Northern to Southern Europe.”European Urban and Regional Studies4(2): 115–134.
91.
WrightC. F.2012“Immigration Policy and Market Institutions in Liberal Market Economies.”Industrial Relations Journal43(2): 110–136.
ZhouM.1997“Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the new Second Generation.”International Migration Review31(4): 975–1008.
