Both Scotland and New Zealand, small nations with a British political heritage, implemented mixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral systems in the 1990s. Minority government characterises most of the New Zealand experience since the introduction of MMP in 1996, while Scotland's only such experience occurred between 2007 and 2011. The Scottish experience differed significantly from that of New Zealand because Scotland has a different party system (characterised by two major cleavages) and exists in a system of multi-level governance, resulting in a more conflict-laden relationship between parties. The centre-periphery cleavage in the Scottish case results from being part of the United Kingdom, while New Zealand is an independent state. Both nations introduced MMP as part of an effort to bring about a ‘new politics’, but the impact of institutional engineering upon the behaviour of politicians has been limited.
BaleT.BergmanT. (2006) ‘Captives no longer, but servants still? Contract parliamentarism and the new minority governance in Sweden and New Zealand’, Government and Opposition, 41:3, 422–449.
2.
BennieL.ClarkA. (2003) ‘Towards moderate pluralism: Scotland's post-devolution party system, 1999–2002’, British Elections and Parties Review, 13:1, 134–155.
3.
BohrerR. E.IIKrutzG. S. (2005) ‘The devolved party systems of the United Kingdom: Sub-national variations from the national model’, Party Politics, 11:6, 654–673.
4.
BostonJ. (2009) ‘Innovative political management: Multi-party governance in New Zealand’, Policy Quarterly, 5:2, 52–59.
5.
BostonJ.LevineS.McLeayE.RobertsN. S. (1996) New Zealand under MMP: A New Politics? (Auckland: Auckland University Press).
6.
BradburyJ.MitchellJ. (2001) ‘Devolution: New politics for old?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54:2, 257–275.
7.
BrechtelT.KaiserA. (1999) ‘Party system and coalition formation in post-reform New Zealand’, Political Science, 51:1, 3–26.
8.
BrownA. (2000) ‘Designing the Scottish Parliament’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53:3, 542–556.
9.
CairneyP. (2006) ‘The analysis of Scottish Parliament committee influence: Beyond capacity and structure in comparing West European legislatures’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:2, 181–208.
10.
CairneyP. (2011) ‘Coalition and minority government in Scotland: Lessons for the United Kingdom?’, The Political Quarterly, 82:2, 261–269.
11.
CrawfordB. (2010) ‘Ten years of devolution’, Parliamentary Affairs, 63:1, 89–97.
12.
DownsA. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).
13.
DuvergerM. (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (New York: Wiley).
14.
FlindersM. (2005) ‘Majoritarian democracy in Britain: New Labour and the constitution’, West European Politics, 28:1, 61–93.
15.
IngleS. (1995) ‘Electoral reform in New Zealand: The implications for Westminster systems’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 1:4, 76–92.
16.
KeatingM. (2005) The Government of Scotland: Public Policy Making after Devolution (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
17.
LevineS. (2004) ‘Parliamentary democracy in New Zealand’, Parliamentary Affairs, 57:3, 646–665.
18.
LijphartA. (1987) ‘The demise of the last Westminster system? Comments on the Report of New Zealand's Royal Commission on the Electoral System’, Electoral Studies, 6:2, 97–103.
19.
LijphartA. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
20.
LijphartA. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven CT: Yale University Press).
21.
LillekerD. (2003) ‘Interviewing the political elite: Navigating a potential minefield’, Politics, 23:3, 207–214.
22.
LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (1967) ‘Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction’, in LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (New York: The Free Press, 1–64.
23.
McGarveyN.CairneyP. (2008) Scottish Politics: An Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
24.
MillerR. (2005) Party Politics in New Zealand (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
25.
MillerR. (2006) ‘Minor party leadership under proportional representation’, in MillerR.MintromM. (eds), Political Leadership in New Zealand (Auckland: Auckland University Press, 113–132.
26.
MitchellJ. (2008) ‘Minority governments, constitutional change and institutional cultures in Scotland’, in BrazierA.KalitowskiS. (eds), No Overall Control? The Impact of a ‘Hung Parliament’ on British Politics (London: Hansard Society, 73–82.
27.
MitchellJ. (2010) ‘The narcissism of small differences: Scotland and Westminster’, Parliamentary Affairs, 63:1, 98–116.
28.
MitchellJ. (2011) ‘Holyrood on display as new politics is laid to rest’, The Herald, Glasgow, 24 January.
29.
NagelJ. (1998) ‘Social choice in a pluralitarian democracy: The politics of market liberalization in New Zealand’, British Journal of Political Science, 28:2, 223–267.
30.
NagelJ. (1999) ‘Assessing the dimensionality of politics: A Comment on Brechtel and Kaiser’, Political Science, 51:1, 27–31.
31.
PalmerG.PalmerM. (2004) Bridled Power: New Zealand's Constitution and Government (4th edn) (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press).
32.
Public Information Service (2008a) ‘Scottish Parliament Legislation, Session 1’, Scottish Parliament Fact Sheet, Edinburgh.
33.
Public Information Service (2008b) ‘Scottish Parliament Legislation, Session 2’, Scottish Parliament Fact Sheet, Edinburgh.
34.
Public Information Service (2011) ‘Scottish Parliament Legislation, Session 3’, Scottish Parliament Fact Sheet, Edinburgh.
35.
SartoriG. (2005) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (s2nd revised edn) (Colchester: ECPR Press).
ShephardM.CairneyP. (2005) ‘The impact of the Scottish Parliament in amending executive legislation’, Political Studies, 53:2, 303–319.
38.
ShugartM. S.WattenbergM. P. (2001) ‘Mixed-member electoral systems: A definition and a typology’, in ShugartM. S.WattenbergM. (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–24.
39.
StrømK. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
40.
StrømK. (1997) ‘Democracy, accountability, and coalition bargaining’, European Journal of Political Research, 31:1–2, 47–62.
41.
WallaceJ. (2002) ‘Reflections on constitutional and other issues concerning our electoral system: The past and the future’, Political Science, 54:1, 47–66.
