This article examines Cavell's critique of Rawlsian citizenship, namely that Rawls' desire to seek a democratic way of life in which citizens can reassure themselves that their behaviour has been ‘above reproach’ reflects a distorted and hence inadequate conception of the demands of the moral life. Although the aim to be ‘above reproach’ was only expressed in Rawls’ ‘A Theory of Justice’, I extend Stephen Mulhall's work to show that Cavell's concern holds not only for Rawls’‘Political Liberalism’ but also ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Having shown that Rawls did not attend to this concern, I then demonstrate the importance of Cavell's argument in the practical context of responding to resentment in democracy. I examine the challenging case of supporters of the BNP's extremist politics, arguing that Rawlsian public reason potentially restricts justice in a way avoided by Cavell's, albeit more demanding, appeal to conversation.
ArzheimerK. (2009) ‘Contextual factors and the extreme right vote on Western Europe 1980–2002’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 259–275.
2.
BetzH. G. (1993) ‘The new politics of resentment: Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Politics, 4:25, 413–427.
3.
CavellS. (1979) The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein. Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
4.
CavellS. (1990) Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism (Chicago IL and London: University of Chicago Press).
5.
CavellS. (1997) ‘Something out of the ordinary’, Proceedings and Addresses of the APA, 71:2, 23–37.
6.
CavellS. (2004) Cities of Words (Cambridge MA and London: Belknap Press).
7.
CavellS. (2005) ‘Passionate and performative utterances: Morals of encounter’, in GoodmanR. B. (ed.), Contending with Stanley Cavell (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177–198.
8.
ConnollyW. E. (1991) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (expanded edn) (London: University of Minnesota Press).
9.
ConnollyW. E. (1999) Why I am Not a Secularist (London: University of Minnesota Press).
10.
ConnollyW. E. (2005) Pluralism (Durham NC: Duke University Press).
11.
CopseyN. (2011a) ‘Introduction: Contemporary perspectives on the British National party’, in CopseyN.MacklinG. (eds), British National Party Contemporary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 1–16.
12.
CopseyN. (2011b) ‘From direct action to community action: The changing dynamics of anti-fascist opposition’, in CopseyN.MacklinG. (eds), British National Party Contemporary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 123–141.
13.
CopseyN.MacklinG. (2011) ‘“THE MEDIA = LIES, LIES, LIES!” The BNP and the media in contemporary Britain’, in CopseyN.MacklinG. (eds), British National Party Contemporary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 81–102.
14.
EatwellR. (2010) ‘Responses to the extreme right in Britain’, in EatwellR.GoodwinM. J. (eds), The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (London: Routledge, 211–230.
15.
EatwellR.GoodwinM. J. (eds) (2010) The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (London: Routledge).
16.
FlathmanR. (2006) ‘Perfectionism without perfection: Cavell, Montaigne, and the conditions of morals and politics’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 98–127.
17.
FordR. (2010) ‘Who might vote for the BNP? Survey evidence on the electoral potential of the extreme right’, in EatwellR.GoodwinM. J. (eds), The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (London: Routledge, 145–168.
18.
FreemanS. (2000) Rawls (London: Routledge).
19.
FriedmanM. (2000) ‘John Rawls and the political coercion of unreasonable people’, in DavionV.WolfC. (eds), The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essays on John Rawls (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 16–33.
20.
Gooding-WilliamsR. (2006) ‘Aesthetics and receptivity: Kant, Nietzsche, Cavell, and Astaire’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 236–262.
21.
GoodwinM. J. (2010) ‘In search of the winning formula: Nick Griffin and the modernization of the British National party’, in EatwellR.GoodwinM. J. (eds), The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (London: Routledge, 169–190.
22.
GoodwinM. J. (2011) Right Responses: Understanding and Countering Populist Extremism, a Chatham House Report (London: Chatham House).
23.
GoodwinM. J.FordR.DuffyB.RobeyR. (2010) ‘Who votes extreme right in 21st century Britain? The social bases for support of the National Front and British National party’, in EatwellR.GoodwinM. J. (eds), The New Extremism in 21st Century Britain (London: Routledge, 191–210.
24.
HammerE. (2006) ‘Cavell and political romanticism’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 164–185.
25.
HonigB. (1993a) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (Ithaca NY and London: Cornell University Press).
26.
HonigB. (1993b) ‘Rawls on politics and punishment’, Political Research Quarterly, 46:1, 99–125.
27.
IbsenH. (1958) A Doll's House, The Wild Duck, The Lady from the Sea, trans. R. F. Sharp, E. Marx Aveling and L.Hannas (London: Everyman).
28.
IvisonD. (1997) ‘A secret history of political liberalism: From Hobbes to Rawls’, History of Political Thought, XVIII:1, 125–147.
29.
JackmanR. J.VolpertK. (1996) ‘Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe’, British Journal of Political Science, 26:1, 501–521.
30.
KellyE.McPhersonL. (2001) ‘On tolerating the unreasonable’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 9:1, 38–55.
31.
LadenA. S. (2001) Reasonably Radical: Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
32.
LarmoreC. (1999) ‘The moral basis of political liberalism’, The Journal of Philosophy, 96:12, 599–625.
33.
LaugierS. (2006) ‘Wittgenstein and Cavell: Anthropology, skepticism and politics’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 19–37.
34.
MouffeC. (1993) The Return of the Political (London: Verso).
35.
MouffeC. (1999) ‘Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism’, Social Research, 66:3, 745–758.
36.
MouffeC. (2005) On the Political (London: Routledge).
37.
MulhallS. (1994) Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
38.
MulhallS. (1997) ‘Promising, consent and citizenship: Rawls and Cavell on morality and politics’, Political Theory, 25:2, 171–192.
39.
NorrisA. (2006) ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 80–97.
40.
NorvalA. J. (2007) Aversive Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
41.
NussbaumM. (2003) ‘Rawls and feminism’, in FreemanS. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 488–520.
42.
OwenD. (1999) ‘Cultural diversity and the conversation of justice: Reading Cavell on political voice and the expression of consent’, Political Theory, 27:5, 579–596.
43.
OwenD. (2006) ‘Perfectionism, parrhesia and the care of the self: Foucault and Cavell’, in NorrisA. (ed.), The Claim to Community (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 80–97.
44.
PettigrewT. F. (2002) ‘Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key social psychological concept’, in WalkerI.SmithH. J. (eds), Relative Deprivations: Specifications, Development and Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 351–373.
45.
QuongJ. (2004) ‘The rights of unreasonable citizens’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12:3, 314–335.
46.
RawlsJ. (1955) ‘Two concepts of rules’, The Philosophical Review, LXIV:1, 3–32.
47.
RawlsJ. (1971) (reprinted 2005) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press).
48.
RawlsJ. (1993) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
49.
RawlsJ. (2002) ‘The idea of public reason revisited’ in RawlsJ., The Law of Peoples; with, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 131–180.
50.
RentonD. (2003) ‘Examining the success of the British National party, 1999–2003’, Race and Class, 45:2, 75–85.
51.
RhodesJ. (2010) ‘White backlash, “unfairness” and justifications of British National party (BNP) support’, Ethnicities, 10:1, 77–100.
52.
RhodesJ. (2011) ‘“It's not just them, it's whites as well”: Whiteness, class and BNP support’, Sociology, 45:1, 102–117.
53.
RichardsonJ. E. (2011) ‘Race and racial difference: The surface and depth of BNP ideology’, in CopseyN.MacklinG. (eds), British National Party Contemporary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 38–61.
54.
TaylorR. S. (2011) ‘Hate speech, the priority of liberty, and the temptations of Nonideal theory’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, online first. Available online at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/9208877076037n54.
55.
TebbleJ. (2006) ‘Exclusion for democracy’, Political Theory, 34:4, 463–487.
56.
Van-ParijsP. (2003) ‘Difference principles’, in FreemanS. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–240.
57.
VatterM. (2008) ‘The idea of public reason and the reason of state: Schmitt and Rawls on the political’, Political Theory, 36:2, 239–271.
58.
WaldronJ. (1993) ‘A right to do wrong’, in Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63–87.
59.
WaldronJ. (1999) Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
