There has been a notable surge in research on the shift from elected government to appointed governance. As the work of public bodies and the decisions made by their board members can impact upon the everyday lives of citizens, the extent to which their boards are both representative and diverse is of great salience. Focusing on the boards of public bodies in the UK, this article explores whether the Labour government's ambition to improve diversity in public appointments was achieved over its three terms of office, and seeks to explain why public boards have remained ‘male, pale and stale’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BearfieldD. (2008), ‘The Demonization of Patronage’, International Journal of Public Administration31(5), pp. 515–534.
CameronD. and SkinnerG. (2010), Public Appointments — Awareness, Attitudes and Experiences, London: Government Equalities Office.
5.
ChildsS. (2004), New Labour's Women MPs, London: Routledge.
6.
ChildsS.LovenduskiJ. and CampbellR. (2005), Women at the Top 2005, London: Hansard Society.
7.
Commissioner for Public Appointments (2001), The Commissioner for Public Appointments Sixth Report 2000–01, London: HMSO.
8.
Commissioner for Public Appointments (2010), The Commissioner for Public Appointments Annual Report 2009–10, London: HMSO.
9.
DaviesM. (2011), Women on Boards, London: Department for Business, Industry and Skills.
10.
DoigA.McIvorS. and MoranJ. (1999), ‘A Word Desperately Seeking Scandal? New Labour and Tony's Cronies’, Parliamentary Affairs52(4), pp. 677–687.
11.
DuroseC.GainsF.RichardsonL.CombsR.BroomeK. and EasonC. (2011), Pathways to Politics, Manchester: EHRC.
12.
Gatenby Sanderson (2009), How Broad is Your Board?London: Gatenby Sanderson.
13.
HC 152 (2007/2008), Parliament and Public Appointments, London: HMSO.
14.
HC 165–1 (2002/2003), Government by Appointment, London: HMSO.
15.
HM Government (2010), The Equality Strategy: Building a Fairer Britain, London: Government Equalities Office.
16.
HoogheL. and MarksG. (2003), ‘Unravelling the Central State, but How?’, American Political Science Review97(2), pp. 233–243.
17.
KeaneJ. (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy, London: Simon & Schuster.
18.
McTavishD. and PyperR. (2007), ‘Modernisation and Gender Representation: The Enterprise Sector in Scotland’, Women in Management Review22(3), pp. 225–231.
19.
MillerK. (2006), ‘Public Appointments: The Gendered Nature of Health Policy?’, Public Policy and Administration21(2), pp. 50–65.
20.
MORI (2000), Public Perceptions of the Ministerial Public Appointments Process, London: MORI.
O'DonnellSir G. (2010b), Keynote speech at the Annual Conference of Independent Public Appointment Assessors in London, 24 November.
23.
PhillipsA. (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon.
24.
PollittC. and TalbotC. (eds.) (2004), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London: Routledge.
25.
SealyR.DoldorE. and VinnicombeS. (2009), Increasing Diversity on Public and Private Sector Boards, London: Government Equalities Office.
26.
SinghV. (2007), ‘Ethnic Diversity on Top Corporate Boards’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management18(12), pp. 2128–2146.
27.
Van ThielS. (2001), Quangos: Trends, Causes, Consequences, London: Ashgate.
28.
VibertF. (2007), The Rise of the Unelected, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
