AlegriaJ.MornisJ. (1991). Segmental analysis unit rending acquisitionInRiebenL.PerfettiC.A., (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BondG.L.DykstraR. (1967). The cooperative program in first-grade reading instruction. Rending Research Quarterly, 2, 135-142.
3.
BradleyL.BryantP.E. (1983), Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection. Nature. 301, 419-421.
4.
BradyS.ShankweilerD, (Eds.) (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CarboM. (1988). Debunking the great phonics myth. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 226-240.
7.
ChallJ.S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York; McGraw-Hill.
8.
ChallJ.S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate. Updated ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
ChallJ.S. (1989). Learning to read; The great debate twenty years later. A response to “Debunking the great phonics myth”, Phi Delta Kappan. 71, 521-538.
EdelskyC. (1990). Whose agenda is this anyway? A response to McKenna. Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 7-11.
12.
EhriL.C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5-31.
13.
EhriL.C.WilceL.S. (1985). Movement into reading; Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic?Reading Research Quarterly. Winter. 163-179.
14.
GoodmanK.S. (1986), What's whole in whole language?Portsmouth, NH; Heinemann.
15.
GoughP.B.HillingerM.L. (1980), Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 20, 179-196.
16.
GoughP.B.JuelC. (in press). The first stages of word recognition. InRiebenL.PerfettiC.A., (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
HeathS.B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
JustM.A.CarpenterP.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19.
JustM.A.CarpenterP.A.MassonM.E.J. (1982). What eye fixations tell us about speed reading and skimming. Carnegie-Mellon University; Eye-Lab Technical Report.
20.
LibermanI.Y.LibermanA.M. (in press) Whole language as, code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia.
21.
LibermanI.Y.ShankweilerD. (1979). Speech. the alphabet and teaching to read. InResnickL.B.WeaverP.A. (Eds.). Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale., NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
LundbergI.FrostJ.PetersenO.-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 264-284.
23.
MacleanM.BryantP.BradleyL. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. InStanovichK., (Ed.), Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Children's reading and the development of phonological awareness. Vol. 3 (3), pp.255-281.
24.
MoraisJ.CaryL.AlegriaJ.BertelsonP. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence or phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 7, 323-331.
25.
PerfettiC.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
PerfettiC.A. (1991). The representation problem in reading acquisition. InGoughP.EhriL.TreimanR., (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
PerfettiC.A.BeckI.BellL.HughesC. (1987), Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. InStanovichK., (Ed.), Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Children's reading and the development of phonological awareness. Vol. 3 (3). pp.283-320.
28.
PerfettiC.A.BellL.DelaneyS. (1988). Automatic phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
29.
RaynerK. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 323-334.
30.
RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
ReadC. (1971). Preschool children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1-34.
32.
ResnickL.B.WeaverP.B. (1979). Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
RiebenL.PerfettiC.A. (1991). Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
SeidenbergM.S.McClellandJ.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
35.
SmithF. (1985). Reading without nonsense (2nd Ed.), New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
StanovichK.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly. 16, 32-71.
37.
StedmanL.C.KaestleC.E. (1987). Literacy and reading performance in the United States from 1880 to the present. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 8-46.
38.
TreimanR.BaronJ. (1981) Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability. InMacKinnonG.E.WallerT.G. (Eds.). Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
39.
TunmerW.E. (1991). Phonological awareness and literacy acquisition. InRiebenL.PerfettiC.A. (Eds.). Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
van OrdenO.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE; Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
41.
WagnerR.K.TorgesenJ.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.