AnscombeG. E. M. (1957), Intention, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
2.
BershadyH. J. (1973), Ideology and Social Knowledge, Oxford, BasilBlackwell
3.
BurgerT. (1977), ‘Talcott Parsons, the problem of order in society, and the program of an analytical sociology’American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83 (3), 320–34.
CohenJ.HazelriggL.PopeW. (1975), ‘De-Parsonising Weber: A critique of Parsons's interpretation of Weber's sociology’American Sociological Review, vol. 40 (2), 229–41.
6.
DahrendorfR. (1968), Essays in the Theory of Society, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
DaweA. (1970), ‘The two sociologies’British Journal of Sociology, vol. 21 (2), 207–18.
8.
HolmwoodJ. M. (forthcoming), ‘Talcott Parsons and the development of his system’, British Journal of Sociology.
9.
HolmwoodJ. M.StewartA. (forthcoming), ‘Theories of power and social reproduction on an action frame of reference’, British Journal of Sociology.
10.
LockwoodD. (1956), ‘Some remarks on The Social System’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 7 (1), 134–56.
11.
MartindaleD. (1971), ‘Talcott Parsons's theoretical metamorphosis from social behaviourism to macro-functionalism’, in TurkH.SimpsonR. L. (eds), Institutions and Social Exchange: The Sociologies of Talcott Parsons and George Casper Homans, Indianapolis and New York, Bobbs-Merrill.
12.
ParsonsT. (1937), The Structure of Social Action, New York, Free Press.
13.
ParsonsT. (1949), ‘The present position and prospects of a systematic theory in sociology’, in Essays in Sociological Theory (revised edition) New York, Free Press.
14.
ParsonsT. (1951), The Social System, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
ParsonsT. (1961), ‘Some considerations on a theory of social change’Rural Sociology, vol. 26 (3), 219–39.
16.
ParsonsT. (1967), ‘Some reflections on the place of force in social process’, in Sociological Theory and Modern Society, New York, Free Press.
ParsonsT.ShilsE. (1951), Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
19.
PopeW. (1973), ‘Classic on classic: Parsons's interpretation of Durkheim’American Sociological Review, vol. 38 (4), 399–415.
20.
PopeW.CohenJ.HazelriggL. (1975), ‘On the divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A critque of Parsons's convergence thesis’American Sociological Review, vol. 40 (4), 417–27.
SavageS. P. (1981), The Theories of Talcott Parsons, London, Macmillan.
23.
ScottJ. F. (1963), ‘The changing foundation of the Parsonsian action scheme’American Sociological Review, vol. 29 (5), 716–35.
24.
ScottJ. F. (1971), The Internalization of Norms: A Sociological Theory of Moral Commitment, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
25.
ScottJ. F. (1974), ‘Interpreting Parsons's work: A problem in method’Sociological Inquiry, vol. 44 (1), 58–61.
26.
SkjervheimH. (1974), ‘Objectivism and the study of man’, Parts I and II, Inquiry, vol. 17, 213–39, 265–302.
27.
TurnerJ. H.BeeghleyL. (1974), ‘Current folklore in the criticism of Parsonian action theory’Sociological Inquiry, vol. 44 (1),47–55.
28.
WarnerR. S. (1978), ‘Toward a redefinition of action theory: Paying the cognitive element its due’American Journal of Sociologyvol. 83 (6), 1317–49.
29.
WeberM. (1968), Economy and Society (trans. RothG.WittichC.), New York, Bedminster Press.
30.
von WrightG. (1971), Explanation and Understanding, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
van Zyl SlabbertF. (1976), ‘Functional methodology in the theory of action’, in LoubserJ. J. (eds), Explorations in General Theory in Social Science, New York, Free Press.