The concept ‘social control’ has been criticised from a variety of quarters in recent years, particularly by historians and historical sociologists. However, it remains in common usage in sociological studies of welfare, deviance and social control. This paper shows, first, how this reliance on the concept of social control is rooted in a wider-ranging argument in social and political theory concerning the liberal-democratic fusion between the state and civil society, and that the lack of resolution of this argument is the foundation of the persistence of the concept social control in other areas of social inquiry, despite its repeated ‘falsification’. Second, the paper highlights the main arguments against the use of ‘social control’ in explaining social order, in particular the misunderstanding of class, culture and power which its use encourages, and the paper will conclude with a discussion of alternative ways of conceptualising the operation of power in contemporary societies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbeleA.Stein-HilbersM., (1978), ‘Alltagswissen, öffentliche meinung über Kriminalität und soziale Kontrolle’, Kriminologisches Journal, 10(3): 161–73.
2.
BaileyR.BrakeM. (eds), (1975), Radical Social Work, London: Edward Arnold.
3.
BarbaletJ.M., (1985), ‘Power and resistance’, British Journal of Sociology, 36 (1): 521–48.
4.
BettsK., (1986), ‘The conditions of action, power and the problem of interests’, Sociological Review, 34 (1): 39–64.
5.
BolgerS.CorriganP.DockingJ.FrostN., (1981), Towards Socialist Welfare Work, London: Macmillan.
6.
BrenzelB., (1983), Daughters of the State, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7.
BurnsT.R., (1986), ‘Actors, transactions and social structure’, 8–37 in HimmelstrandUlf (ed.). Sociology: From Crisis to Science? Vol 2: The Social Reproduction of Organization and Culture, London: Sage.
8.
CallonM., (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, 196–232 in LawJohn (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
CastelR.CastelF.LovellA., (1982), The Psychiatric Society, New York: Columbia University Press.
CleggS.R., (1989), Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.
12.
CohenJ.AratoA., (1989), ‘Politics and the reconstruction of the concept of civil society’, in HonnethA.McCarthyT.OffeC.WellmerA. (eds), Zwischenbetrachtungen: Im Prozess der Aufklärung, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 482–503.
13.
CohenS., (1979), ‘The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control’, Contemporary Crises, 3: 339–63.
14.
CohenS., (1985), Visions of Social Control, Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
CohenS.ScullA. (eds). Social Control and the State: Historical and Comparative Essays, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16.
CorriganP.LeonardP., (1978), Social Work Practice under Capitalism, London: Macmillan.
17.
CrewD.F., (1986), ‘German socialism, the state and family policy, 1918–33’, Continuity and Change, 1(2): 235–63.
18.
CrowG., (1989), ‘The use of the concept ‘strategy’ in recent sociological literature’, Sociology, 23(1): 1–24.
19.
DavisJ., (1984), ‘A poor man's system of justice: The London police courts in the second half of the nineteenth century’, The Historical Journal, 27(2):
20.
DekkerJ.J.H., (1985), Straffen, redden en opvoeden: Het onstaan en de ontwikkeling van de residentiele heropvoeding in West-Europa, 1814–1914, met bijzondere aandacht voor “Nederlansche Mettray”, Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
21.
De SwaanA., (1988), In Care of the Stale. Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
DingwallR.EekelaarJ.M.MurrayT., (1984), ‘Childhood as a social problem: A survey of the history of legal regulation’, Journal of Law and Society, 11(2): 207–32.
23.
DonzelotJ., (1979), The Policing of Families, London: Hutchinson.
24.
EdwardsA., (1988), Regulation and Repression. The study of social control, Sydney: Allen Unwin.
25.
EvansP.B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT., (1985), Bringing the Slate Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
FalerP., (1974), ‘Cultural aspects of the Industrial Revolution: Lynn, Massachusetts, Shoemakers and Industrial Morality, 1826–1860’, Labor History, 15(3): 367–94.
27.
FoucaultM., (1977a), ‘Power and sex: An interview with Michel Foucault’, Telos, 32: 152–61.
28.
FoucaultM., (1977b), Discipline and Punish, London: Allen Lane.
29.
FoucaultM., (1979), ‘Governmentality’, Ideology and Consciousness, 6: 5–21.
FoucaultM., (1982), ‘The subject and power’, in DreyfusHubert L.RabinowPaul, Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 208–26.
32.
FoucaultM., (1988), ‘Technologies of the self, 16–49 in MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (eds). Technologies of the Self. A seminar with Michel Foucault, London: Tavistock.
33.
FoxR., (1976), ‘Beyond “social control”: Institutions and disorder in bourgeois society’, History of Education Quarterly, 16(2): 203–7.
34.
GarlandD., (1985), Punishment and Welfare, Aldershot: Gower.
35.
GerstenbergerH., (1985), ‘The poor and the respectable worker: On the introduction of social insurance in Germany’, Labour History, 48: 69–85.
36.
GiddensA., (1982), Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, London: Macmillan.
37.
GordonL., (1986), ‘Family violence, feminism and social control’, Feminist Studies, 12(3): 453–78.
38.
GordonL., (1988), Heroes of their Own Lives: The politics and history of family violence, New York: Viking Penguin.
39.
GramsciA. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, edited by HoareQ.SmithG.N., New York: International Publishers.
40.
GrayR., (1977), ‘Bourgeois hegemony in Victorian Britain’, in BloomfieldJon (ed.). Class, Hegemony and Party, London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 73–93.
41.
HabermasJ., (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, London: Heinemann.
42.
HabermasJ., (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A critique of functionalist reason, Cambridge: Polity Press.
43.
HabermasJ. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Polity Press.
44.
HallP.A., (1986), Governing the Economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France, Cambridge: Polity Press.
45.
HarrisR.WebbD., (1987), Welfare, Power and Juvenile Justice, London: Tavistock, 1987.
46.
HenryS., (1983), Private Justice: Towards Integrated Theorising in the Sociology of Law, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47.
HenryS., (1987), ‘The construction and deconstruction of social control: Thoughts on the discursive production of state law and private justice’, in LowmanJ.MenziesR.S.PalyT.S. (eds), Transcarceration: Essays in the sociology of social control, Aldershot: Gower, pp. 89–108.
48.
HewittM., (1983), ‘Bio-politics and social policy: Foucault's account of welfare’, Theory, Culture and Society, 2(1): 67–84.
49.
HigginsJ., (1980), ‘Social control theories of social policy’. Journal of Social Policy, 9(1): 1–23.
50.
HornM., (1984), ‘The moral message of child guidance 1915–1945’, Journal of Social History, 18(1): 25–36.
51.
HoulbrookeR.A., (1984), The English Family 1450–1700, Longman: New York.
52.
HumphriesS., (1981), Hooligans or Rebels? An Oral History of Working-class Childhood and Youth 1889–1939, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
53.
JanowitzM., (1975), ‘Sociological theory and social control’, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 82–108.
54.
JonesG.S., (1977), ‘Class expression versus social control’, History Workshop, 4: 162–70.
55.
JonesG., (1986), Social Hygiene in Twentieth Century Britain, London: Croom Helm.
56.
KaestleC., (1983), Pillars of the Republic, New York: Hill and Wang.
57.
KatzM., (1978), ‘Origins of the institutional state’, Marxist Perspectives, 1(4):
58.
KatzM. (1986), In the Shadow of the Poorhouse. A Social History of Welfare in America, New York: Basic Books.
59.
KittrieN., (1971), The Right to be Different, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
60.
LaqueurT., (1976), Religion and Respectability: Sunday Schools and Working-Class Culture 1780–1850, New Haven: Yale University Press.
61.
LaschC., (1977), Haven in a Heartless World: The family besieged, New York: Basic Books.
62.
LaschC., (1980), ‘Life in the therapeutic state’, New York Review of Books, 27(10), (June 12): 24–32.
63.
LatourB., (1986), ‘The powers of association’, in LawJ. (ed.). Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 264–80.
64.
LawJ., (1986), ‘On power and its tactics: A view from the sociology of science’, Sociological Review, 34(1): 1–38.
65.
LloydC., (1989), ‘Realism, structurism, and history: Foundations for a transformative science of society’, Theory and Society, 18(4): 451–94.
66.
LuhmannN., (1982), The Differentiation of Society, New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
MacfarlaneA., (1986), Marriage and Love in England 1300–1840, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
68.
McCalmanJ., (1984), Struggletown. Public and Private Life in Richmond, 1900–1965, Melbourn: Melbourne University Press.
69.
McGovernC.M., (1986), ‘The myth of social control and custodial oppression: Patterns of psychiatric medicine in late nineteenth-century institutions’, Journal of Social History, 20(1): 3–23.
70.
MarxK., (1975), ‘The Holy Family’ [1845], in Collected Works, Vol. 4, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
71.
MarxK.EngelsF., (1976), ‘The German Ideology [1846]’ in Collected Works, Vol. 5, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
72.
MathiesonT., (1987), ‘The eagle and the sun: On panoptical systems and mass media in modern society’, in LowmanJohnMenziesRobert J.PalysT.S. (eds), Transcarceration: Essays in the Sociology of Social Control, Aldershot: Gower, pp. 59–75.
73.
MatthewsJ.J., (1984), Good and Mad Women. The historical construction of femininity in twentieth century Australia, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
74.
MeadG.H., (1925), ‘The genesis of the self and social control’, International Journal of Ethics, 35: 251–77.
75.
MeierR.F., (1982), ‘Perspectives on the concept of social control’, Annual Review of Sociology, 8: 35–55.
76.
MelossiD., (1990), The State of Social Control, Cambridge: Polity Press.
77.
MertonR.K., (1984), ‘The fallacy of the latest word: The case of “pietism and science”’, American Journal of Sociology, 89 (5): 1091–121.
78.
MeyerP., (1983), The Child and the State. The intervention of the state in family life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79.
MinsonJ., (1985), Genealogies of Morals. Nietzsche, Foucault, Donzelot and the Eccentricity of Ethics, London: Macmillan.
80.
MuraskinW.A., (1976), ‘The social control theory in American history: A critique’, Journal of Social History, 9(4): 565–68.
81.
O'ConnorJ., (1973), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St Martin's Press.
82.
OffeC., (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State, London: Hutchinson.
83.
ParsonsT., (1951), The Social System, New York: Free Press.
84.
PattonP., (1989), ‘Taylor and Foucault on power and freedom’, Political Studies, 37(2): 260–76.
85.
PeukertD., (1986), Grenzen der Sozialdisziplinierung. Aufsteig und Krise der deutschen Jugendfürsorge von 1878 bis 1932, Köln: Bund Verlag.
86.
PivenF.F., (1984), ‘Women and the state: Ideology, power and the welfare state’, Socialist Review, 14(2): 11–19.
87.
PivenF.F.ClowardR.A., (1972), Regulating the Poor. The functions of public welfare, London: Tavistock, 1972.
88.
PlattA., (1977), The Child Savers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89.
ReeseW.J., (1986), Power and the Promise of School Reform: Grass Roots Movements during the Progressive Era, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
90.
ReigerK., (1985), The Disenchantment of the Home, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
91.
RoseN., (1987), ‘Beyond the public/private division: Law, power and the family’, Journal of Law and Society, 14(1): 61–76.
92.
RossE.A., (1901), Social Control, New York: Macmillan.
93.
SchmittC., (1985), The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
94.
SiederR., (1986), ‘Vata, derf i aufstehn?: Childhood experiences in Viennese working-class families around 1900’, Continuity and Change, 1(1): 53–88.
95.
SimmelG., (1971), On Individuality and Social Forms, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
96.
SpitzerS., (1987), ‘Security and control in capitalist societies: The fetishism of security and the secret thereof’, in LowmanJohnMenziesRobert J.PalysT.S. (eds), Transcarceration: Essays in the Sociology of Social Control, Aldershot: Gower, pp. 43–58.
97.
TholfsenT.R., (1976), Working Class Radicalism in Mid-Victorian England, London: Croom Helm.
98.
ThomasW.I.ZnanieckiF., (1927), The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, 2 vols.New York: Knopf.
99.
ThompsonF.M.L., (1981), ‘Social control in Victorian Britain’, The Economic History Review, 34(2): 189–208.
100.
ThompsonF.M.L., (1988), The Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900, London: Fontana.
101.
TiffinS., (1983), ‘In pursuit of reluctant parents’, in Sydney Labour History Group, (eds). What rough beast? The Slate and Social Order in Australian History, Sydney: Allen and Unwin, pp. 130–50.
102.
van KriekenR., (1986), ‘Social theory and child welfare: Beyond social control’, Theory and Society, 15(3): 401–29.
103.
van KriekenR., (1989), ‘Towards “good and useful men and women”: The state and childhood in Sydney, 1840–1890’, Australian Historical Studies, 23: 405–25.
104.
van KriekenR., (1990), ‘State bureaucracy and social science: Child welfare in New South Wales, 1915–1940’, Labour History, 58: 17–35.
105.
WilliamsR., (1960), Culture and Society 1780–1950, London: Chatto and Windus.
106.
WimshurstK., (1981), ‘Child labour and school attendance in South Australia 1890–1915’, Historical Studies, 19: 388–411.
107.
WrongD.H., (1979), Power: Its Forms, Bases and Uses, New York: Harper and Row.
