Two trends affect modern fatherhood simultaneously: on the one hand, there is an increased emphasis on paternal involvement in the lives of young children. On the other hand, rates of parental break-up have increased, and fathers often live apart from their children. Norway is a country in which both trends are very strong. This article looks at the patterns of contact between non-resident fathers in Norway and their children, focusing on the extreme ends of the distribution: fathers with weekly contact, and fathers who have not seen their children in three months or more. After a brief overview of recent developments in Norwegian family policies, some key dilemmas and tensions in modern family life are identified. One relate to commitment in cohabiting relationships, another to the tension between commitment to children from previous relationships and new partners. A third factor that is taken into consideration, is poverty. In the empirical analysis, we find no difference in the odds for having frequent/ very infrequent contact between formerly married and formerly cohabiting fathers, nor between fathers who live alone and fathers who have repartnered. Poverty is however a strong indicator of loss of contact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckUlrich and Beck-GernsheimElisabeth, (1995), The Normal Chaos of Love, Cambridge: Polity Press.
2.
BeckerGary B., (1981), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BradshawJonathanStimsonCarolSkinnerChristine and WilliamsJulie, (1999), Absent Fathers?London: Routledge.
4.
BradshawJ. and FinchN., (2002), A Comparison of Child Benefit packages in 22 countries, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 174.
5.
BrandthBerit and KvandeElin, (2003), Fleksible fedre, Oslo: University Press.
6.
BraverS.H.WolchikS.A.SandlerI.N.FogasB.S. and ZventinaD., (1991), ‘Frequency of visitation by divorced fathers: differences in reports by fathers and mothers’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61 (3): 448–454.
7.
CookseyElizabeth C. and CraigPatricia H., (1998), ‘Parenting from a distance: the Effects of Paternal Characteristics on Contact between Nonresidential Fathers and their Children’, in Demography, 35 (2): 187–200.
8.
EllingsæterA-L., (1999), ‘Dual Breadwinners between State and Market’, in CromptonR. (ed.), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
ClarkeLindsay, (1998), ‘Fathers and Absent Fathers: Sociodemographic Similarities in Britain and the United States’, Demography, 53 (2): 217–228.
10.
DenchGeoff, (1994), The Frog, the Prince and the Problem of Men.London: Neanderthal Books.
11.
FløttenTone, (2003), ‘Fattigdom i en velferdsstat’, Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 6 (2): 71–88.
12.
GiddensAnthony, (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
GiddensAnthony, (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Secuality, Love and Eroticism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
GornicJ.C., (2001), ‘Welfare state research and gender: what have we learned?’, in EriksenJ., (eds), Increasing Social Inequality – From a Uniform to a Fragmented Social Policy?Oslo: NOVA report series 5/01: 113–132.
15.
HobsonBarbara (ed.), (2002), Making Men into Fathers. Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
JensenAn-Magritt and ClausenSten-Erik, (1997a), Barns familier. Samboerskap og foreldrebrudd etter 1970, NIBR report series 21/1997, Oslo: Norsk institutt for By-og Regionsforskning (NIBR).
17.
JensenAn-Magritt and ClausenSten-Erik, (1997b), Samvær og fravær. Foreldres kontakt med barn de ikke bor sammen med. NIBR working papers 103/ 1997, Oslo: Norsk institutt for By-og Regionsforskning (NIBR).
18.
JensenAn-Magritt and ClausenSten-Erik, (1999), ‘Samboerskal som foreldreskap’, in NOU 1999:25, Samboerne og samfunnet, appendix 4, Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.
19.
JensenAn-Magritt, (2003), ‘Flere barn bor med far – mot et vendepunkt?’, Samfunnsspeilet, 2003, 3: 2–8.
20.
KitterødRagniH., (2004), ‘Samvær med barn etter samlivsbrudd: hva svarer far og hva svarer mor?’, in Samfunnsspeilet, 18 (2): 55–64.
21.
KurtzStanley, (2004), ‘The end of marriage in Scandinavia’, The Weekly Standard, 9 (20), 2.2.2004.
22.
LewisJane, (2001), The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
LyngstadJan, (2004), ‘Samværsforeldres samvær med sine barn: Mer faktisk enn avtalt samvær’, n Samfunnsspeilet18 (2): 47–54.
24.
LødemelIvar, (1997), The Welfare Paradox. Income Maintenance and Personal Social Services in Norway and Britain, 1945–1966, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
25.
MacleanMavis and EekelaarJohn, (1997), The Parental Obligation: A Study of Parenthood Across Households, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
26.
MarsiglioWilliam, (2000), ‘Scholarship on Fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond’, in Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62 (4): 1173–1191.
27.
McHenryP.C.McKelveyM.W.LeighD. and WarkL. (1996), ‘Nonresidential father involvement: a comparison of divorced, separated, never married, and remarried fathers’, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 25 (1/2): 1–13.
28.
MurrayCharles, (1985), Losing Ground. American Social Policy, 1950–1980, New York: Basic Books.
29.
OttosenMay Heide, (1997), Børn i sammenbragte familier. En studie af foreldreskab som social konstruktion, Socialforskningsinstituttet report serie 97:24. Copenhagen: Socialforskningsinstituttet.
30.
PryorJan and RodgersBryan, (2001), Children in Changing Families. Life After Parental Separation, Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
SeltzerJudith, (1998), ‘Father by Law: Effects of Joint Legal Custody on Nonresident Fathers' Involvement with Children’, Demography, 35 (2): 135–146.
32.
SimonsR.L.LinK.GordonL.C.CongerR.D. and LorentzF.O. (1999), ‘Explaining the higher incidence of adjustment problems among children of divorce compared to those in two-parent families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61 (4): 1020–1033.
33.
SkevikAnne, (2004a), ‘The New Family's Vulnerable Vanguard: Child Maintenance reform in Norway’, Social Policy and Society, 3 (1): 2004.
34.
SkevikA., (2004b), ‘Far, forsørger og fattig? Økonomiske problemer blant norske samværsfedre’, Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 7 (1): 2–16.
35.
SkevikAnne and HyggenChrister, (2002), Samværsfedrenes situasjon. Rapport fra en spørreun-dersøkelse, NOVA-rapport 15/2002, Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring (NOVA).
36.
SkirbekkSigurd, (1999), Ideologi, myte og tro ved slutten av et århundre : sosiologisk kulturteori og funksjonsanalyse, Oslo: TANO Aschehoug.
37.
SmartCarol, (1997), ‘Wishful Thinking or Harmful Tinkering? Sociological Reflections on Family Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 26 (3): 1–21.
38.
SmartCarol and NealeBren, (1999), Family Fragments?Cambridge: Polity Press.
39.
SmythBruce and WolcottIrene, (2004), ‘Why study parent-child contact?’, in SmythBruce (ed.), Parent-Child Contact and Post-Separation Parenting Arrangements, Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies, report no. 9.
St. Meld. nr. 29, (2002–2003), Om familien – forpliktende samliv og foreldreskap.Oslo: Barne-og Familiedepartementet.
43.
StephensLinda S., (1996), ‘Will Johnny see Daddy This Week? An Empirical Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives on Postdivorce Contact’, in Journal of Family Issues, 17 (4): 466–494.
44.
StewartSusan D., (2003), ‘Nonresident Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment. The quality of non-resident father-child interaction’, Journal of Family Issues, 24 (2): 217–244.
45.
SætreAina H., (2004), ‘Foreldreansvar, daglig omsorg og samvær: Far er blitt viktigere, men mor er fortsatt viktigst’, In Samfunnsspeilet, 18 (2): 38–47.
46.
ThuenFrode, (2004), Livet som deltidsforeldre, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
47.
WhiteL. and GilbrethJ.G., (2001), ‘When children have two fathers: Effects of relationships with stepfathers and noncustodial fathers on adolescent outcomes’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63 (1): 155–167.
