Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community Colleges: An Examination of Fiscal and Demographic Trends in Higher Education and the Rise of Statewide Articulation Agreements
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2006
Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community Colleges: An Examination of Fiscal and Demographic Trends in Higher Education and the Rise of Statewide Articulation Agreements
Recent data indicate that a large proportion of students entering community colleges are identifying terminal certificate or occupational associate degrees instead of academic majors or transfer as their short-term goal. Despite this, throughout much of the 1980s and 1990s, states established articulation agreements as policy instruments to enhance the transfer of students from public 2-year institutions to 4-year institutions. This conundrum raises an interesting two-part question: In the absence of a significant increase in the demand for transfer by community colleges entrants, why have states enacted these agreements, and what potential impacts may arise from these legislative trends? Applying the state relative autonomy theory, we contend that the rise of articulation agreements constitutes a new state strategy to cope with the stagnation of higher education appropriations, the spiraling costs of tuition, and an excess demand for affordable higher education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic integrity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AlexanderF. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411—431.
3.
AndersonG. M., SunJ. C., and AlfonsoM. (2006). Effectiveness of statewide articulation agreements on the probability of transfer: A preliminary policy analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 261—291.
4.
BoggessS., and RyanC. (2002). Financing the future: Postsecondary students, costs, and financial aid: 1996–1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
5.
BowlesS., and GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
6.
BrintS., and KarabelJ. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BurdS. (2003, October 24). Republicans introduce bill to penalize college for tuition increases. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A26.
8.
BurkeJ. C. (1997). Performance-funding indicators: Concerns, values, and models for two- and four-year colleges and universities. Albany: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
9.
BurkeJ. C.. (2002). Funding public colleges and universities for performance: Popularity, problems, and prospects. Albany: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
10.
ClarkB. (1960). The “cooling-out” function in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 569—576.
11.
CohenA. M., and BrawerF. B. (1996). The American community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Commission on National Investment in Higher Education. (1996). Breaking the social contract: The fiscal crisis in higher education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
13.
DoughertyK. (1994). The contradictory college: The conflict origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
DuderstadtJ. (2002). A university for the 21st century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Education Commission of the States. (2002). State funding for community colleges: A 50-state survey. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
16.
EhrenbergR. G. (2000, March 20). Financial prospects for American higher education in the first decade of the twenty-first century Paper presented at the 2000 American Council on Education Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
17.
GangiR., SchiraldiV., and ZiedenbergJ. (1999). New York state of mind?: Higher education vs. prison funding in the empire state, 1988–1998. Washington, DC: The Justice Policy Institute and the Correctional Association of New York.
18.
HellerD. E. (2001). Trends in public colleges and universities. In and and HellerD.E. (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 11—38). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
IgnashJ. M., and TownsendB. K. (2001). Statewide transfer and articulation policies: Current practices and emerging issues. In TownsendB.K., and TwomblyS.B. (Eds.), Community colleges: Policy in the future context (pp. 173—192). Westport, CT: Ablex.
20.
JohnstoneD. B. (1999). Financing higher education: Who should pay? In AltbachP.G., BerdahlR.O., and GumportP. J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 347—369). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
KaneT. J. (1999). The price of admission: Rethinking how Americans pay for college. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
KaneT. J., OrszagP. R., and GunterD. L. (2003). State fiscal constraints and higher education spending: The role of Medicaid and the business cycle. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved May 1, 2003, from http://www.sppsr.ucla.edu/faculty/kane/KOGWorkingPaper042103.doc.
23.
KarabelJ. (1972). Community colleges and social stratification. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 521—562.
24.
KarabelJ. (1974). Protecting the portals: Class and the community college. Social Policy, 5(1), 12—19.
25.
KarabelJ. (1986). Community colleges and social stratification. New Directions for Community Colleges, 14(2), 13—30.
26.
LeeV. E., and FrankK. A. (1990). Students’ characteristics that facilitate the transfer from two-year to four-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 178—193.
27.
LevineA., and NidifferJ. (1995). Beating the odds: How the poor get to college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
MedskerL. L. (1960). The junior college. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
MonroeC. R. (1972). A profile of the community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
NasawD. (1979). Schooled to order. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2004). Measuring up 2004: The national report card on higher education. San Jose, CA: Author.
32.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2002). State budget and tax actions 2002: Preliminary report. Denver, CO: Author.
33.
PincusF. L. (1980). The false promises of community colleges: Class conflict and vocational education. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 332—361.
34.
PurdumT. S. (2000, July 4). Shift in the mix alters the face of California. The New York Times, p. 1.
35.
RochinR. I., and SoberanisP. (1992). Middle class squeeze. Claremont, CA: Tomas Rivera Center.
36.
RouseC. E. (1994). What to do after high school: The two-year versus four-year college enrollment decision. In and and EhrenbergR.G. (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 59—88). Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press.
37.
RuppertS. (1996). The politics of remedy: State legislative views on higher education. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
38.
RuppertS. (2001). Where do we go from here: State legislative views on higher education in the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
39.
SchragP. (1998). Paradise lost: California's experience and America's future. New York: New Press.
40.
ShorI. (1980). Critical thinking and everyday life. Boston: South End Press.
41.
SuretteB. J. (2001). Transfer from two-year to four-year college: An analysis of gender differences. Economics of Education Review, 20, 151—163.
42.
TownsendB. K. (Ed.). (1999). Understanding the impact of reverse transfer students on community colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
TownsendB. K. (2001). Four-year college students’ use of the community college: A middle-class takeover? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Richmond, VA.
44.
TownsendB. K., and IgnashJ. M. (2000). Assumptions about transfer behavior in state-level articulation agreements: Realistic or reactionary? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002a). The condition of education, 2002 (NCES 2002–025). Washington, DC: Author.
47.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002b). Projection of education statistics to 2012 (NCES 2002–030). Washington, DC: Author.
48.
VelezW. (1985). Finishing college: The effects of college type. Sociology of Education, 58, 191—200.
49.
WinterP. A., and HarrisM. R. (1998). A field study of completer and non-completer community college reverse transfer students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL.
50.
ZusmanA. (1999). Issues facing higher education in the twenty-first century. In Altbach, BerdahlP.G., and GumportP.J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 109—148). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
ZwerlingL. S. (Ed.) (1986). The community college and its critics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
