This paper reports the findings of the first academic study in Latin America, and one of the few in any emerging economy, to explore entrepreneurial perceptions and activity in peripheral geographic locations. A survey of experts included 139 respondents from three peripheral regions and two core regions in Chile. A key finding is that those located at the periphery perceived critical entrepreneurial resources and access to markets less favorably than their counterparts at the core, but surprisingly, they perceived greater business opportunity in their area. A further survey of 2,200 respondents concerning actual entrepreneurial activities among the total adult population revealed no differences between peripheral and core regions. This study revives the debate about specific regional policies for fostering the growth of local business, and the entrepreneurial framework conditions required at the regional level in emerging economies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcsZ. (2010). Entrepreneurship and regional development. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
2.
AcsZ., AmorosJ.E., BosmaN.S., & LevieJ. (2008). From entrepreneurship to economic development: Celebrating ten years of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Proceedings of Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
3.
AcsZ. & ArmingtonC. (2004). The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates. Journal of Urban Economies, 56(2), 244–278.
4.
AcsZ. & SzerbL. (2010). Global entrepreneurship and the United States. Ruxton, MD: Small Business Administration of the US Government.
5.
AreniusP. & MinnitiM. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.
6.
ArmingtonC. & AcsZ. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.
7.
BarroR. & Sala i MartinX. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BrenesE., HaarJ., & RequenaB. (2010). Latin America: Environmental and firm–level challenges. Journal of Business Research, 62(9), 849–853.
9.
BurkeA.E., FitzroyF.R., & NolanM.A. (2009). Is there a north–south divide in self–employment in England?Regional Studies, 43(4), 529–544.
10.
CannarellaC. & PiccioniV. (2006). Dysfunctions and sub–optimal behaviors of rural development networks. International Journal of Rural Management, 2(1), 29–57.
11.
ChristallerW. (1966). Central places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
12.
ConoverW.J. (1998). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
CookeP. & LeydesdorffL. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge–based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15.
14.
CooperA.C. (1993). Challenges in predicting new firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 241–253.
15.
DavelaarE. & NijkampP. (1987). The urban incubator hypothesis—Old wine in new bottles. In FischerM.M. & SaubererM. (Eds.), Gesellschaft—Wirtschaft—Raum, Festschrift fur Karl Stiglbauer (pp. 198–213). Vienna, Austria: AMR Mitteilungen.
16.
DavisS., HaltiwangerJ., & SchuhS. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
DelgadoM., PorterM., & SternS. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495–518.
18.
DockeryT.M. & BedeianA.G. (1989). Attitudes versus actions’: LaPiere's (1934) classic study revisited. Social Behavior and Personality, 17(1), 9–16.
19.
European Commission. (2003). Green paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
20.
FeldmanM. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 409–429.
21.
FeldmanM., FrancisJ., & BercovitzJ. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 39(1), 129–141.
22.
FelzenszteinC. & GimmonE. (2008). Industrial clusters and social networking for enhancing inter–firm cooperation: The case of natural resources–based industries in Chile. Journal of Business Market Management, 2(4), 187–202.
FelzenszteinC., GimmonE., & CarterS. (2010). Geographical co–location, social networks and inter–firm marketing cooperation: The case of the salmon industry. Long Range Planning, 43(5–6), 675–690.
25.
FelzenszteinC., GimmonE., & HuemerL. (2010). The effects of co–location on marketing externalities in the salmon farming industry. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25(1), 73–82.
26.
FloridaR. (2003). Entrepreneurship, creativity, and regional economic growth. In HartD.M. (Ed.), The emergence of entrepreneurship policy (pp. 39–58). Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FrankA.G. (1969). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America—Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
28.
FrankA.G. (1981). Crisis: In the third world. New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
29.
FrankA.G. (1984). Critique and anti–critique—Essays on dependence and reformism. New York, NY: Praeger.
30.
FrenkelA., SheferD., & RoperS. (2003). Public policy, location choice and the innovation capability of high–tech firms: A comparison between Israel and Ireland. Journal of Economics, 82(2), 203–221.
31.
FritschM. (1997). New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics, 9(5), 437–448.
32.
FritschM. & MuellerP. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975.
33.
FujitaM., KrugmanP., & VenablesA. (1999). The spatial economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
GEM. (2007). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2007 reporte nacional de Chile. Chile: Universidad del Desarrollo.
35.
GEM. (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2008 world executive report (BosmaN., AcsZ., AutioE., CodurasA. & LevieJ., Eds.). London, U.K.: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
36.
GlaeserE., KallalH., ScheinkmanJ., & ShleiferA. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.
37.
GlaeserE. & KerrW. (2009). Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain?Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(3), 623–663.
38.
HaltiwangerJ., JarminR., & MirandaJ. (2009). Who creates jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young. Working paper. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
HeaddB. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61.
40.
HenreksonM. & JohanssonD. (2008). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Working Paper No. 733. Stockholm, Sweden: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
41.
HindleK. (2006). A measurement framework for international entrepreneurship policy research: From impossible index to malleable matrix. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3(2), 139–182.
42.
JohnsonP. (2004). Differences in regional firm formation rates: A decomposition analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 431–445.
43.
KlyverK. (2008). An analytical framework for micro–level analysis of GEM data. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 6(4), 583–603.
44.
LanjouwP. (2001). Nonfarm employment and poverty in rural El Salvador. World Development, 29(3), 529–547.
45.
LePiereR. (1934). Attitudes versus actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.
46.
LernerJ. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—And what to do about it. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
LevieJ. & AutioE. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.
48.
MaleckiE. (1994). Entrepreneurship in regional and local development. International Regional Science Review, 16(1 & 2), 119–153.
49.
MarshallA. (1895). Principles of economics (3rd ed.). London, U.K.: Macmillan.
50.
MuellerP., Van StelA., & StoreyD. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.
51.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.
PoleseM. & ShearmurR. (2006). Growth and location of economic activity: The spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth and Change, 37(3), 362–395.
54.
PorterM. (1998). The microeconomic foundations of economic development: The global competitiveness report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
55.
PorterM. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 545–546.
56.
PsaltopoulosD., StathopoulouS., & SkurasD. (2005). The location of markets, perceived entrepreneurial risk, and start–up capital of micro rural firms. Small Business Economics, 25(10), 147–158.
57.
ReynoldsP., StoreyD., & WestheadP. (1994). Cross–national comparisons of the variations in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28, 443–456.
58.
ReynoldsP.D., BosmaN., AutioE., HuntS., BonoN.D., ServaisI., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.
59.
RobertsM.J. & BarleyL. (2004). How venture capitalists evaluate potential venture opportunities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
60.
SaxenianA. (1994). Regional advantage culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston, MA: Harvard University.
61.
SaxenianA. (2006). The New Argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
SheferD. & FrenkelA. (2002). An evaluation of the Israeli technological incubator program and its projects. Haifa, Israel: The Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies of Science and Technology.
63.
ShepherdD.A. (1999). Venture capitalists’ introspection: A comparison of “in use” and “espoused” decision policies. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(2), 76–87.
64.
StephanW.G. (1985). Intergroup relations. In LindzeyG. & AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 234–261). New York, NY: Random House.
65.
SternbergR. & WennekersS. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203.
66.
TamasyC. (2006). Determinants of regional entrepreneurship dynamics in contemporary Germany: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Regional Studies, 40, 365–384.
67.
The Economist. (2011). Regional disparities—gaponomics, March 10, pp. 17–18.
68.
ThurikR. & WennekersS. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140–149.
69.
TodlingF. & WanzenbockH. (2003). Regional differences in structural characteristics of start–ups. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(4), 351–370.
70.
Van StelA. & SuddleK. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31–47.
71.
WeberA. (1909). Über den Standort des Industrien, published in English as Alfred Weber's Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
72.
WestP.III, BamfordC., & MarsdenW. (2008). Contrasting entrepreneurial economic development in emerging Latin American economies: Applications and extensions of resource–based theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 15–36.
73.
WestlundH. & BoltonR. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 77–113.
74.
World Bank. (2008). Doing business report 2008. Available at http://www.doingbusiness.org, accessed 20 December 2011.
75.
ZhouL., BiswasB., BowlesT., & SaundersP.J. (2011). Impact of globalization on income distribution inequality in 60 countries. Global Economy Journal, 11(1), 1–16.
