Using the upper echelon perspective and imprinting arguments as key theoretical lenses, this paper examines how characteristics of new venture core teams influence internal consistency and distinctiveness of human resources (HR) values at the early–growth stage of the firm. We found that shared organizational experience among founding core team members positively predicts internal consistency and distinctiveness of the dominant HR values, whereas functional diversity positively predicts distinctiveness of these values. Contrary to our prediction, when the levels of both prior shared organizational experience and functional diversity are high, positive effects turned negative, indicating more complex interaction effects between the two team characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguinisH. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderator. New York: Guilford.
2.
AguinisH., WernerS., AbbottJ.L., AngertC., ParkJ.H., & KohlhausenD. (2010). Customer–centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 515–539.
3.
AmasonA.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.
4.
BainbridgeS.M. (2002). Why a board? Group decision–making in corporate governance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55, 1–55.
5.
BaronJ.N., BurtonM.D., & HannanM.T. (1996). The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2), 239–275.
6.
BaronJ.N. & HannanM.T. (2002). Organizational blueprints for success in high–tech start–ups: Lessons from the Stanford project on emerging companies. California Management Review, 44(3), 8–36.
7.
BaronJ.N., HannanM.T., & BurtonM.D. (1999). Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 527–547.
8.
BaronJ.N., HannanM.T., & BurtonM.D. (2001). Labor pain: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high–tech firms. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 960–1012.
9.
BeckerB.E. & GerhartB. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance, progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.
10.
BeckerB.E. & HuselidM.A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.
11.
BeckmanC.M., BurtonD.M., & O'ReillyC. (2007). Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 147–173.
12.
BlauP.M. & SchwartzJ.E. (1984). Cross–cutting social circles: Testing a macro–structural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13.
BoekerW. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 489–515.
14.
BoekerW. (1997a). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product–market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–236.
15.
BoekerW. (1997b). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 152–170.
16.
BoekerW. & WiltbankR. (2005). New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organization Science, 16(2), 123–133.
17.
BowenD.E. & OstroffC. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.
18.
BrittainJ. & FreemanJ. (1980). Organizational proliferation and density dependency selection. In KimberlyJ.R. & MilesR.H. (Eds.), The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations (pp. 291–338). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
19.
BundersonJ.S. & SutcliffeK.M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893.
20.
BurtR.S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Cannon–BowersJ.A., SalasE., & ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental model in expert team decision making. In CastellanN.J.Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
CarpenterM.A. (2002). The implication of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–284.
23.
CarpenterM.A., GeletkanyczM.A., & SandersW.G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
24.
CarrollG.R. & HarrisonJ.R. (1998). Organizational demography and culture: Insights from formal model and simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 637–667.
25.
ClarkB.R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184.
26.
ColbertB.A. (2004). The complex resource–based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 341–358.
27.
CoxT. & BlakeS. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.
28.
DastmalchianA., LeeS., & NgI. (2000). The interplay between organizational and national cultures: A comparison of organizational practices in Canada and South Korea using the Competing Values Framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 388–412.
29.
De JongA., SongM., & SongL.Z. (in press). How leader founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management.
30.
DelmarF. & ShaneS. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385–410.
31.
DerelyJ.E. & DotyD.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.
32.
EchambadiR., CampbellB., & AgarwalR. (2006). Encouraging best practice in quantitative management research: An incomplete list of opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1801–1820.
33.
EisenhardtK.M. (1989). Making fast decisions in high–velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.
34.
EisenhardtK.M. & SchoonhovenC.B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–529.
35.
EnsleyM.D., CarlandJ.C., & CarlandJ.W. (2000). Investigating the existence of the lead entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 59–77.
36.
EnsleyM.D. & PearceC.L. (2001). Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 145–160.
37.
EnsleyM.D., PearsonA.W., & AmasonA.C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386.
38.
FinneyJ.W., MitchellR.E., CronkiteR.C., & MoosR.H. (1984). Methodological issues in estimating main and interactive effects: Examples from coping/social support and stress field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 85–98.
39.
FooM.D. (2010). Member experience, use of external assistance and evaluation of business ideas. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 32–43.
40.
FooM.D. (2011). Teams developing business ideas: How member characteristics and conflict affect member–rated team effectiveness. Small Business Economics, 36, 33–46.
41.
FooM.D., SinH.P., & YiongL.P. (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 389–399.
42.
FooM.D., WongP.K., & OngA. (2005). Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges’ evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 385–402.
43.
GoodsteinJ. & O'ReillyC. (1988). It's what's up top that counts: The role of executive team demography and team dynamics in determining firm success and failure. Unpublished paper.
44.
HambrickD.C., ChoT.S., & ChenM. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.
45.
HambrickD.C. & MasonP.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
46.
HannanM.T. & FreemanJ. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.
47.
HannanM.T. & FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
48.
HaytonJ. (2003). Strategic human capital management in SMEs: An empirical study of entrepreneurial performance. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 375–391.
49.
HelfatC.E. & PeterafM.A. (2003). The dynamic resource based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.
50.
HigginsM.C. (2005). Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
51.
HmieleskiK.M., ColeM.S., & BaronR.A. (in press). Shared authentic leadership and new venture performance. Journal of Management.
52.
JacksonS.E., JoshiA., & ErhardtN.L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.
53.
JamesL.R., DemareeR.G., & WolfG. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within–group interrater agreement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.
54.
JanisK.A. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
55.
JehnK.A., NorthcraftG.B., & NealeM.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
56.
KatzJ.A., AldrichH.E., WelbourneT.M., & WilliamsP.M. (2000). Guest editor's comments: Special issue on human resource management and the SME: Toward a new synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1), 7–10.
57.
KimberlyJ.R. (1979). Issues in the creation of organizations: Initiation, innovation and institutionalization. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 437–457.
58.
KleinK.J., DansereauF., & HallR. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195–229.
59.
KlimoskiR. & MohammedS. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 20(2), 403–438.
60.
KnightD., PearceC.L., SmithK.G., OlianJ.D., SimsH.P., SmithK.A., et al. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 445–465.
61.
KorY.T. (2003). Experience–based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14(6), 707–719.
62.
LauD.C. & MurnighanJ.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.
63.
LauD.C. & MurnighanJ.K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645–659.
64.
LeungA. (2003). Different ties for different needs—Recruitment practices of entrepreneurial firms at different developmental phases. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 303–320.
65.
LeungA. & ChaturvediS. (2011). Linking the fits, fitting the links: Connecting different types of PO fit to attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 391–402.
66.
LeungA., ZhangJ., WongP.K., & FooM.D. (2006). The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: Multiple “fit” considerations. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 664–686.
67.
MurrayA.J. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.
68.
OstroffC., ShinY., & KinickiA.J. (2005). Multiple perspectives of congruence, relationships between value congruence and employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 591–623.
69.
PanayotopoulouL. & PapalexandrisN. (2004). Examining the link between human resource management orientation and firm performance. Personnel Review, 33(5), 499–520.
70.
QuinnR.E. & CameronK. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.
71.
QuinnR.E. & RohrbaughJ. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.
72.
QuinnR.E. & SpreitzerG.M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 115–142.
73.
ScheinE.H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.
74.
SchmelterR., MauerR., BorschC., & BrettelM. (2010). Boosting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs. Human Resource Management, 49(4), 715–741.
SimonsT., PelledL.H., & SmithK.A. (1999). Making use of differences: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673.
77.
SmithK.G., SmithK.A., OlianJ.D., SimsH.P., O'BannonD.P., & ScullyJ.A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438.
78.
StinchcombeA.L. (1965). Organization and social structure. In MarchJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand–McNally.
79.
TsuiA.S., EganT.D., & O'ReillyC. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
80.
TushmanM.L. & RosenkopfL. (1996). Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Science, 42, 939–953.
81.
WagnerW.G., PfefferJ., & O'ReillyC.A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top–management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74–92.
82.
YeungA.K.O., BrockbankJ.W., & UlrichD.O. (1991). Organizational culture and human resource practices. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5(1), 59–81.
83.
ZengerT.R. & LawrenceB.S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communications. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376.
84.
ZimmermanM.A. & ZeitzG.J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.
