Because many individuals poststroke lack access to the quality and intensity of rehabilitation to improve upper extremity motor function, a home-based robotic-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation device is being paired with an individualized home exercise program.
Aims/Hypothesis
The primary aim of this project is to determine the effectiveness of robotic-assisted home therapy compared with a home exercise program on upper extremity motor recovery and health-related quality of life for stroke survivors in rural and underserved locations. The secondary aim is to explore whether initial degree of motor function of the upper limb may be a factor in predicting the extent to which patients with stroke may be responsive to a home therapy approach. We hypothesize that the home exercise program intervention, when enhanced with robotic-assisted therapy, will result in significantly better outcomes in motor function and quality of life.
Design
A total of 96 participants within six-months of a single, unilateral ischemic, or hemorrhagic stroke will be recruited in this prospective, single-blind, multisite randomized clinical trial.
Study Outcomes
The primary outcome is the change in upper extremity function using the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcomes include changes in: upper extremity function (Wolf Motor Function Test), upper extremity impairment (upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Test), self-reported quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale), and affect (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).
Discussion
Similar or greater improvements in upper extremity function using the combined robotic home exercise program intervention compared with home exercise program alone will be interpreted as evidence that supports the introduction of in-home technology to augment the recovery of function poststroke.
MillerELMurrayLRichardsL. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke2010; 41:2402–48.
2.
KwakkelGKollenBJvan der GrondJPrevoAJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke2003; 34:2181–6.
3.
DobkinBH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med2005; 352:1677–84.
4.
JohanssonBB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: the Willis lecture. Stroke2000; 31:223–30.
5.
JenkinsWMMerzenichMM. Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res1987; 71:249–66.
6.
KaplonRTPrettymanMGKushiCLWinsteinCJ. Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT). Clin Rehabil2007; 21:950–8.
7.
WolfSLBlantonSBaerHBreshearsJButlerAJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist2002; 8:325–38.
8.
SchwammLHAudebertHJAmarencoP. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke2009; 40:2635–60.
9.
BennettKJOlatosiBProbstJC. Health Disparities: A Rural-Urban Chartbook. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, 2008.
10.
SkolarusLEMeurerWJBurkeJFPrvu BettgerJLisabethLD. Effect of insurance status on postacute care among working age stroke survivors. Neurology2012; 78:1590–5.
11.
ClarkPACapuzziKHarrisonJ. Telemedicine: medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Med Sci Monit2010; 16:RA261–72.
12.
CarignanCRKrebsHI. Telerehabilitation robotics: bright lights, big future?J Rehabil Res Dev2006; 43:695–710.
13.
LumPSBurgarCGShorPCMajmundarMVan der LoosM. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83:952–9.
14.
KwakkelGKollenBJKrebsHI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2008; 22:111–21.
15.
JohanssonTWildC. Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17:1–6.
16.
PironLTurollaAAgostiniM. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med2009; 41:1016–102.
17.
LumPSUswatteGTaubEHardinPMarkVW. A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev2006; 43:391–400.
18.
RosensteinLRAThotaASamameBAlbertsJL. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. Am J Occup Ther2008; 62:28–34.
19.
KutnerNGZhangRButlerAJWolfSLAlbertsJL. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther2010; 90:493–504.
20.
PocockSJSimonR. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics1975; 31:103–15.
21.
LoACGuarinoPDRichardsLG. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med2010; 362:1772–83.
22.
WinsteinCJWolfSL. Chapter 17: task oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery; in SteinJHarveyRFMackoRVWinsteinCJZorowitzR (eds): Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Wood-bridge, CT, Demos Publishing, 2009:267–90.
23.
WolfSWWinsteinCJ. Brain Repair After Stroke. CramerSCNudoRJ (eds.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010:219–32.
24.
WolfSWWinsteinCJMillerJP. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA2006; 296: 2095–104.
25.
YozbatiranNDer-YeghiaianLCramerSC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2008; 22:78–90.
26.
PlatzTPinkowskiCvan WijckFKimIHdi BellaPJohnsonG. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil2005; 19:404–11.
27.
HsiehCLHsuehIPChiangFMLinPH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing1998; 27:107–13.
28.
LangCEEdwardsDFBirkenmeierRLDromerickAW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89:1693–700.
29.
LinKCFuTWuCY. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2010; 24:486–92.
30.
LinJHHsuMJSheuCF. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther2009; 89:840–50.
31.
WinsteinCJMillerJPBlantonS. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2003; 17:137–52.
32.
MorrisDMUswatteGCragoJECookEW3rdTaubE. The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82:750–5.
33.
WolfSLCatlinPAEllisMArcherALMorganBPiacentinoA. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke2001; 32:1635–9.
34.
DuncanPWWallaceDLaiSMJohnsonDEmbretsonSLasterLJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke1999; 30:2131–40.
35.
Fugl-MeyerARJaaskoLNorlinV. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med1975; 7:73–83.
36.
GladstoneDJDanellsCJBlackSE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2002; 16:232–40.
37.
ShinarDGrossCRPriceTRBankoMBolducPLRobinsonRG. Screening for depression in stroke patients: the reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Stroke1986; 17:241–5.
38.
ParikhRMEdenDTPriceTRRobinsonRG. The sensitivity and specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in screening for post-stroke depression. Int J Psychiatry Med1988; 18:169–81.
39.
AnsariNNNaghdiSArabTKJalaieS. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect. NeuroRehabilitation2008; 23:231–7.
40.
JurkiewiczMTMarzoliniSOhP. Adherence to a home-based exercise program for individuals after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil2011; 18:277–84.
41.
KleimJAJonesTA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res2008; 51:S225–39.
42.
ChristieLBedfordRMcCluskeyA. Task-specific practice of dressing tasks in a hospital setting improved dressing performance post-stroke: a feasibility study. Aust Occup Ther J2011; 58:364–9.
43.
PageSJLevinePLeonardASzaflarskiJPKisselaBM. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther2008; 88:333–40.
44.
HarveyRLWinsteinCJEverest TrialG. Design for the Everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23: 32–44.
