JacobsD. O., “Clinical Practice: Diverticulitis,”New England Journal of Medicine357, no. 20 (2007): 2057–2066; SchechterS.MulveyJ.EisenstatT. E., “Management of Uncomplicated Acute Diverticulitis: Results of a Survey,”Diseases of the Colon and Rectum42, no. 4 (1999): 470–475.
2.
Id.
3.
StrateL. L.LiuY. L.SyngalS.AldooriW. H.GiovannucciE. L., “Nut, Corn, and Popcorn Consumption and the Incidence of Diverticular Disease,”Journal of the American Medical Association300, no. 8 (2008): 907–914.
4.
See CalfeeB. E., “Note, What You Don't Know Will Hurt You: Physicians' Duty to Warn Patients about Newly Discovered Dangers in Previously Initiated Treatments,”Cleveland State Law Review31, no. 3 (1982): 649–677.
5.
Compare Tresemer v. Barke, 150 Cal. Rptr. 384 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978) (holding physician had duty to contact patient when IUD recalled three years later) with Doyle v. Planned Parenthood, 639 P.2d 240 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980) (holding physician had no duty to warn patient of recalled IUD because episode of care had expired years earlier).
6.
See WyniaM. K.WilliamsG.LemieuxJ., “Many Physicians Are Willing to Use Patients' Electronic Personal Health Records, But Doctors Differ by Location, Gender, and Practice,”Health Affairs30, no. 2 (2011): 266–273.
7.
See JainA.AtrejaA.HarrisC. M.LehmannM.BurnsJ.YoungJ., “Responding to the Rofecoxib Withdrawal Crisis: A New Model for Notifying Patients at Risk and Their Health Care Providers,”Annals of Internal Medicine142, no. 3 (2005): 182–186.
8.
See, e.g., GriffinC. A.AxilbundJ. E.CodoriA. M.DeiseG.MayB.PendergrassC.TilleryM.TrimbathJ. D.GiardelloF. M., “Patient Preferences Regarding Recontact by Cancer Genetics Clinicians,”Familial Cancer5, no. 3 (2007): 265–273.
9.
See, e.g., SmithS. K.TrevenaL.SimpsonJ. M.BarrattA.NutbeamD.McCafferyK. J., “A Decision Aid to Support Informed Choices about Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Low Education: Randomized Controlled Trial,”BMJ341, no. 7779 (2010): c5370–c5383.
10.
See generally HunterA. G. W.SharpeN.MullenM.MeschinoW. S., “Ethical, Legal, and Practical Concerns about Recontacting Patients to Inform Them of New Information: The Case in Medical Genetics,”American Journal of Medical Genetics103, no. 2 (2001): 265–276; MangalmurtiS. S.MurtaughL.MelloM. M., “Medical Malpractice Liability in the Age of Electronic Health Records,”New England Journal of Medicine363, no. 21 (2010): 2060–2067.
11.
See generally PetersP. G., “The Quiet Demise of Deference to Custom: Malpractice Law at the Millennium,”Washington & Lee Law Review57, no. 1 (2000): 163–205.
12.
See LiebmanC. B.HymanC. S., “A Mediation Skills Model to Manage Disclosure of Errors and Adverse Events to Patients,”Health Affairs23, no. 4 (2004): 22–32.
13.
See Department of Health and Human Services, “Breach Notification for Unsecured Protected Health Information; Interim Final Rule,”74Federal Register72,740 (2009).
14.
National Conference of State Legislatures, “State Security Breach Notification Laws,” updated October 12, 2010, available at <www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13489> (last visited September 12, 2011).
15.
See LoB.ParhamL., “The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship,”Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics38, no. 1 (2010): 17–26; MillerR. H.SlimI., “Physicians' Use of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers and Solutions,”Health Affairs23, no. 2 (2004): 116–126.
16.
See EpsteinR. M.FiscellaK.LesserC. S.StrangeK. C., “Why the Nation Needs a Policy Push on Patient-Centered Health Care,”Health Affairs29, no. 8 (2010): 1489–1495; Nut tingP. A.CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L.StrangeK. C.StewartE.JaenC., “Transforming Physician Practices to Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Les sons from the National Demonstration Project,”Health Affairs30, no. 3 (2011): 439–445.
17.
See FisherE. S.ShortellS. M., “Accountable Care Organizations: Accountable for What, to Whom, and How,”Journal of the American Medical Association304, no. 15 (2010): 1715–1716; McClellanM.McKethanA. N.LewisJ. L.RoskiJ.FisherE. S., “A National Strategy to Put Accountable Care into Practice,”Health Affairs29, no. 5 (2010): 982–990.
18.
HIT also has many non-clinical or “secondary” uses, including for public health purposes, in which there may be a growing appreciation for the value of the capacity to issue continuous alerts. See, e.g., GarrettN. Y.NicholsM. N.StaesC. J.AkinsC.SafranC., “Characterization of Public Health Alerts and Their Suitability for Alerting in Electronic Health Record Systems,”Journal of Public Health Management and Practice17, no. 1 (2011): 1–7.
19.
See KriestA. H.WoolfS. H., “A Vision for Patient-Centered Health Information Systems,”Journal of the American Medical Association305, no. 3 (2011): 300–301.
20.
See HsiaoC. J.BeattyP. C.HingE. S.WoodwellD. A.RechtsteinerE. A.SisJ. E., “Electronic Medical Record/Electronic Health Record Use by Office-based Physicians: United States, 2008 and Preliminary 2009,”available athttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/emr_ehr/emr_ehr.htm> (last visited September 12, 2011) (43.9% of office-based physicians had any type of HER system).