BilleM., BjerregaardP., & SørensenT. F. (2015). Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in–between. Emotion, Space and Society, 15, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.11.002
2.
ButlerR., & BowlbyS. (1997). Bodies and spaces. An exploration of disabled people's experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1068/d150411
3.
CaseyE. S. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short period of time. In FeldS. & BassoK. H. (Eds.), Senses of place (1st ed., pp. 13–52). School of American Research Press.
4.
de BottonA. (2007). The architecture of happiness. Penguin UK.
DischingerM. (2000). Designing for all senses: Accessible spaces for visually impaired citizens. Chalmers University of Technology.
7.
DrakeJ. (1984). Architects and user requirements in public–sector housing: 1. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 11, 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1068/b110389
8.
FinnertyS. G. (2016). Stigma and empathy: An organising principle for the continuum of social understanding [Paper presentation]. Annual Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference 2016, Dublin, Ireland. http://ceur-ws.org/VOL-17151/AICS_2016_paper_53.pdf
9.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
10.
GoodleyD. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. SAGE.
GuffeyE. (2018). Designing disability: Symbols, space, and society. Bloomsbury Publishing.
13.
HallP., & ImrieR. (1999). Architectural practices and disabling design in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260409
14.
HerwigO. (2008). Universal design: Solutions for a barrier–free living. Birkhäuser.
15.
IhdeD. (1976). Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound. Ohio University Press.
16.
ImrieR. (1998). Oppression, disability and access in the built environment. In ShakespeareT. (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 129–146). Cassell.
17.
ImrieR. (2000). Responding to the design needs of disabled people. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/713683959
18.
ImrieR. (2003). Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t
19.
ImrieR., & KumarM. (1998). Focusing on disability and access in the built environment. Disability & Society, 13(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826687
IttelsonW. H., ProshanskyH. M., & RivlinL. G. (1974). In DempseyD. (Ed.), An introduction to environmental psychology. Holt.
22.
JellemaP., AnnemansM., & HeylighenA. (2018). At home in the hospital and hospitalised at home: Exploring experiences of cancer care environments. In LangdonP., LazarJ., HeylighenA., & DongH. (Eds.), Breaking down barriers: Usability, accessibility and inclusive design (pp. 215–226). Springer.
23.
JohnsonM. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. University of Chicago Press.
24.
LiebermannW. K. (2019). Teaching embodiment: Disability, subjectivity, and architectural education. The Journal of Architecture, 24(6), 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2019.1684974
25.
MurphyR. F. (1987). The body silent. Phoenix House.
26.
NormanD. (2013). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
PallasmaaJ. (2005). The eyes of the skin. Wiley–Academy.
30.
ParkinsonJ. A., Paillie PérezF., & PantojaR. (2018, October). Psicología del espacio (The psychology of space). Conscious Cities Antology 2018: Human–Centered Design, Science, and Technology. theccd.org/articles/psicologia-del-espacio-psychology-space
Reid–CunninghamA. R. (2009). Anthropological theories of disability. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350802631644
33.
RiegerJ., & StrickfadenM. (2016). Taken for granted: Material relations between disability and codes/guidelines. Societies, 6(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6010006
34.
Scheper–HughesN., & LockM. M. (1987). The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 1(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020
35.
SchullA. (1984). A convenient place to get rid of inconvenient people: The Victorian lunatic asylum. In Buildings and society (pp. 37–60). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36.
ShildrickM. (2001). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. SAGE.
37.
SiebersT. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press.
38.
SnyderS. L., & MitchellD. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. University of Chicago Press.
39.
StaszakJ. F. (2009). Other/otherness. In Kitchin & thrift (Ed.), international encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. A12, pp. 43–47). Elsevier.
VerhulstL., ElsenC., & HeylighenA. (2016). Whom do architects have in mind during design when users are absent? Observations from a design competition. Journal of Design Research, 14(4), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2016.082032
45.
WaldenfelsB. (2011). In place of the other. Continental Philosophy Review, 44(2), 151–164.
46.
WaldschmidtA., BerressemH., & IngwersenM. (Eds.). (2017). Culture—theory—Disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. Transcript Verlag.
47.
ŻurawH. (2016). Disability as a symbol. Anthropology of Communication to the Semantics of Disability, 3(1), 16.