Spatial ability, defined as the ability to visualize, imagine, translate, and interpret 2D and 3D spatial information, is a crucial building block required for the interior design and architecture professions. In this paper, we report on the development process as well as the validity and reliability of the Architecture and Interior design domain–specific Spatial Ability Test (AISAT), a new instrument that measures domain–specific spatial ability in the field of architecture and interior design. A total of 142 college students in Korea and the U.S. engaged in the final stage of the development process—the validity and reliability check—by taking both the AISAT and two general spatial ability tests. The results from the split–half correlation and internal consistency showed that the AISAT reached a desirable level of reliability. Face, content, concurrent, and convergent validity were achieved to verify the AISAT. The authors hope that the AISAT will be used to measure domain–specific spatial ability, ultimately expanding our understanding of the role of spatial ability in spatial design thinking and performance. The AISAT has the potential to benefit (1) researchers who seek a credible tool to assess design students’ spatial ability, (2) educators investigating the effect of their intervention in spatial design performance in relation to spatial ability, and (3) researchers in spatial ability who would like to extend their interest in spatial design beyond the traditional psychometric approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenA. D. (2010). Complex spatial skills: The link between visualization and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503530
2.
ArslanA. R., & DazkirS. S. (2017). Technical drafting and mental visualization in interior architecture education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110215
3.
BajpaiS., & BajpaiR. (2014). Goodness of measurement: Reliability and validity. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3(2), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2013.191120133
4.
BednarzR., & LeeJ. (2019). What improves spatial thinking? Evidence from the spatial thinking abilities test. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(4), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1626124
5.
BerkowitzM., GerberA., ThurnC. M., EmoB., HoelscherC., & SternE. (2021). Spatial abilities for architecture: Cross sectional and longitudinal assessment with novel and existing spatial ability tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 4096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609363
6.
BlajenkovaO., KozhevnikovM., & MotesM. A. (2006). Object–spatial imagery: A new self–report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1182
BoyleG. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-r
9.
Castro–AlonsoJ. C., & AtitK. (2019). Different abilities controlled by visuospatial processing. In Castro–AlonsoJ. C. (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 23–51). Springer.
10.
ChoJ. Y. (2012). Spatial ability, creativity, and studio performance in architectural design. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer–Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 131–140. http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/caadria2012_087.content.pdf.
11.
ChoJ. Y. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.006
12.
ChoJ. Y., & SuhJ. (2019). Understanding spatial ability in interior design education: 2D–to–3D visualization proficiency as a predictor of design performance. Journal of Interior Design, 44(3), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12143
13.
CohenC. A., & HegartyM. (2012). Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.007
EkstromR. B., FrenchJ. W., HarmanH. H., & DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service.
16.
EliotJ., & CzarnolewskiM. Y. (2007). Development of an everyday spatial behavioral questionnaire. The Journal of General Psychology, 134(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.3200/genp.134.3.361-381
17.
GaughranW. (2002). Cognitive modelling for engineers. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference and exposition. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-10547
18.
GuilfordJ. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469–479.
19.
HegartyM., & WallerD. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
20.
HegartyM., & WallerD. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In ShahP. & MiyakeA. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610448.005
21.
HoC. H. (2006). Spatial cognition in design. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia Institute of Technology.
22.
HongH. K. (2001). The development of spatial ability test for young children. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 21(4), 189–209.
23.
IshikawaT. (2013). Geospatial thinking and spatial ability: An empirical examination of knowledge and reasoning in geographical science. The Professional Geographer, 65(4), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2012.724350
24.
JuJ. E., & KimA. Y. (2010). Gender differences in spatial ability and using strategies for solving spatial problems. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 15(4), 829–851. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2010.15.4.014
25.
KozhevnikovM., & HegartyM. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200477
26.
LeeJ., & BednarzR. (2012). Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography, 111(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.583262
27.
LinnM. C., & PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta–analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
28.
LohmanD. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807768
29.
LohmanD. F. (1996). Spatial ability and g. In DennisI. & TapsfieldP. (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 97–116). Erlbaum Associates.
30.
MaedaY., & YoonS. Y. (2013). A meta–analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x
31.
MaierP. H. (1996). Spatial geometry and spatial ability–how to make solid geometry solid? [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of Didactics of Mathematics, Osnabrueck, Germany.
32.
McGeeM. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889
33.
MontelloD. R., LovelaceL. L., GolledgeR. G., & SelfC. M. (1999). Sex–related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00160
34.
NessD., FarengaS. J., & GarofaloS. G. (2017). Spatial intelligence: Why it matters from birth through the lifespan. Routledge.
35.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw–Hill.
36.
PetersM., LaengB., LathamK., JacksonM., ZaiyounaR., & RichardsonC. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032
37.
SorbyS., VeurinkM., & StreinerS. (2018). Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes.’Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.001
SuhJ., & ChoJ. Y. (2020). Linking spatial ability, spatial strategies, and spatial creativity: A step to clarify the fuzzy relationship between spatial ability and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100628
40.
SuttonK., & WilliamsA. (2010). Implications of spatial abilities on design thinking. In DurlingD., BousbaciR., ChenL., GauthierP., PoldmaT., Roworth–StokesS., & StoltermanE. (Eds.), Design and complexity, DRS international conference 2010, Design Research Society, Montreal, Canada. http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/115.pdf
41.
SuttonK., & WilliamsA. (2012). Developing a discipline–based measure of visualisation. Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education.
42.
VandenbergS. G., & KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of 3–dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
