Reframing Third Places: Environmental Changes of Merging Places During COVID-19

Abstract

The ubiquitous nature of technology is changing the way humans interact with interior space and redefining the third place, venues where individuals gather for socialization. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the fusion of physical and virtual space led to an overlapping of the first place (home) that served as the physical host for the virtual second (work), and third (social gathering) places. Most critically, the first place (home) became a proxy for second and third place experiences as we started connecting with the outside world, albeit virtually. The goal of this study was to determine the extent that individuals relied on technology to meet their socializing needs in response to COVID-19, verify if individuals are altering their environment as a result of the pandemic and whether these changes align with physical third-place characteristics, and inform interior designers on how to intentionally design physical space in ways that include virtual experiences. The researchers employed a mixed-methods approach by gathering data from an online survey, incorporating closed-ended and open-ended questions, using two different convenience sampling approaches (N = 229), and asking participants to submit photos to support their responses. Results illustrated that during the pandemic, virtual environments integrated with the home and became a substitute for physical third places. Four themes identified the modifications in physical space that occurred because of COVID-19 as individuals accommodated the merging of their home, work, school, and social places. Insights regarding the design of successful physical spaces that embrace virtual experiences are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alsop

(2022). Tech trends 2022—Statistics & facts. Stat. https://www.statista.com/topics/9025/tech-trends/#topicHeader__wrapper.

Anacleto

Bueno

Ferreira

(2017). A kitchen, the Twitter and my friends: Having a coffee with ICT. In Anais do VII Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social (pp. 79–85). Society Computing Brazilian. https://sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/waihcws/article/view/3878.

Ancu

Cozma

(2009). MySpace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150903333064

Attiwill

(2012). Practices of interiorization: An inter-story. In Vaikla-Poldma

(Ed.), Meanings of designed spaces (pp. 175–184). Fairchild Books.

Augustin

(2014). Designing for collaboration and collaborating for design. Journal of Interior Design, 39(1), ix–xviii. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12020

Campbell

(2014). Designing retirement community third places: Attributes impacting how well social spaces are liked and used. Journal of Interior Design, 39(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12035

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

Chen

C. W.

Lin

C. S.

(2014). Building a sense of virtual community: The role of the features of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(7), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0530

(2007). The use of photography as a qualitative tool. Nurse Researcher, 15(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2007.10.15.1.27.c6052

10.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.

12.

D’Souza

Lin

Y. F.

(2015). Places in the virtual and physical continuum: Examining the impact of virtual behaviors on place attributes of wireless coffee shops. In Thompson

J. A.

Blossom

(Eds.), The handbook of interior design (pp. 366–381). Wiley Blackwell.

13.

Ducheneaut

Moore

R. J.

Nikell

(2007). Virtual third places: A case study of sociability in massively multiplayer games. Journal of Collaborative Computing, 16, 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9041-8

14.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

15.

Eriksson

Sjöberg

Rosenbröijer

C. J.

Fagerstrøm

(2019). Consumer brand post engagement on Facebook and Instagram–a study of three interior design brands. In International conference on electronic business, New Castle, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339253551_Consumer_brand_post_engagement_on_Facebook_and_Instagram_-_A_study_of_three_interior_design_brands.

16.

Glover

T. D.

Parry

D. C.

(2009). A third place in the everyday lives of people living with cancer: Functions of Gilda’s Club of greater Toronto. Health & Place, 15(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.02.007

17.

Habermas

(1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity Press.

18.

Hawkins

C. J.

Ryan

L. J.

(2013). Festival spaces as third places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-02-2013-0002

19.

Izadpanah

Gunce

(2021). Social media as a means of increasing non-designers’ insight into interior design. The Design Journal, 24(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1912904

20.

Izani Abidin

M. I. Z.

Alkhalidi

Razak

(2020). Utilizing VR/AR for interior design program. In 2020 the 9th international conference on networks, communication, and computing (pp. 7–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3447654.3447656.

21.

Jin

Meneely

Park

(2021). Virtual reality versus real-world space: Comparing perceptions of brightness, glare, spaciousness, and visual acuity. Journal of Interior Design, 47(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12209

22.

Jung

E. H.

Sundar

S. S.

(2018). Status update: Gratifications derived from Facebook affordances by older adults. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4135–4154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818768090

23.

Kalantari

Neo

J. R. J.

(2020). Virtual environments for design research: Lessons learned from use of fully immersive virtual reality in interior design research. Journal of Interior Design, 45(3), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12171

24.

Kokkinos

C. M.

Baltzidis

Xynogala

(2016). Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.017

25.

Kujath

C. L.

(2011). Facebook and MySpace: Complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0311

26.

Langlais

M. R.

Vaux

D. E.

(2022). Establishing and testing a quantitative measure for evolving third-place characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.293201

27.

Lawson

(2004). Libraries as virtual third places. New Library World, 105, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800410526758

28.

Le Page

(2021). The year of coronavirus variants: How evolution tormented us in 2021. NewScientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2302993-the-year-of-coronavirus-variants-how-evolution-tormented-us-in-2021/.

29.

Lee

Gillath

Miller

(2019). Effects of self- and partner’s online disclosure on relationship intimacy and satisfaction. PLoS One, 14, e0212186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212186

30.

Lefebvre

(1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell (Original work published 1974).

31.

Lindsey

P. F.

McLain-Kark

(1998). A comparison of real world and virtual world interior environments. Journal of Interior Design, 24(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.1998.tb00559.x

32.

Low

Smart

(2020). Thoughts about public space during Covid-19 pandemic. City & Society, 32(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12260

33.

McArthur

J. A.

(2016). Digital proxemics: How technology shapes the way we move. Peter Lang.

34.

McArthur

J. A.

White

A. F.

(2016). Twitter chats as third places: Conceptualizing a digital gathering site. Social Media + Society, 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116665857

35.

Memarovic

Fels

Anacleto

Calderon

Gobbo

Carroll

J. M.

(2014). Rethinking third places: Contemporary design with technology. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v10i3.3440

36.

Misra

Stokols

(2012). A typology of people–environment relationships in the digital age. Technology in Society, 34(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.10.003

37.

North

H. J.

(2008). Distance distortion: A comparison of real world and computer animated environments. Journal of Interior Design, 28(2), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2002.tb00376.x

38.

Nummelin

(2015). Instagram as a marketing tool: A qualitative study on social media marketing for Swedish interior design SMEs [Master’s thesis, Jonkoping University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:882679/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

39.

Oldenburg

(1999). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of the community. Marlowe & Company.

40.

Oldenburg

Brissett

(1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265–284.

41.

Perolini

(2014). Interior environments: The space of interiority. Zoontechnica-The Journal of Redirective Design, 3, 1–5 https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/68837

42.

Phua

Jin

S. V.

Kim

(2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041

43.

Pitas

Ehmer

(2020). Social capital in the response to COVID-19. American Journal of Health Promotion, 34(8), 942–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120924531

44.

Purnell

(2015). Expanding Oldenburg: Homes as third places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 8(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-03-2014-0006

45.

Rosenbaum

M. S.

Ward

Walker

B. A.

Ostrom

A. L.

(2007). A cup of coffee with a dash of love: An investigation of commercial social support and third-place attachment. Journal of Service Research, 10(1), 43–59.

46.

Ross

Willson

V. L.

(2017). One-sample t-test. In Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (pp. 9–12). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_2

47.

Sherman

L. E.

Michikyan

Greenfield

P. M.

(2013). The effects of text, audio, and in-person communication on bonding between friends. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-2-3

48.

Siltanen

Oksman

Ainasoja

(2013). User-centered design of augmented reality interior design service. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(1), 547–563.

49.

Sinclair

Grieve

(2017). Facebook as a source of social connectedness in older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.003

50.

Soukup

(2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 8, 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061953

51.

Steinkuhler

Williams

(2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as ‘third places.’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 805–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00300.x

52.

Tehve

(2021). New public bodies. Journal of Interior Design, 46(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12187

53.

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Spruance

L. A.

Patten

(2021). COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing in the United States: A mixed-methods study on lived experiences and well-being. The Social Science Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1852856

54.

Vaux

(2015). Interior people places: The impact of the built environment on third places. In Thompson

J. A.

Blossom

N. H.

(Eds.), The handbook of interior design (pp. 347–365). Wiley Blackwell.

55.

Vaux

D. E.

Asay

S. M.

(2019). Supporting families in crisis: Awareness and use of third places. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 48(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12325

56.

Vaux

D. E.

Langlais

M. R.

(2018). Virtual space: Is it real? Proceedings of the interior design educator’s council (IDEC) annual conference, Boston (pp. 276–278). https://idec.org/annual-conference-proceedings/.

57.

Vaux

D. E.

Langlais

M. R.

(2021). An update of third place theory: Evolving third place characteristics represented in Facebook. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 17(4), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2021100107

58.

Vaux

D. E.

Wang

(2020). Research methods for interior design: Applying interiority. Routledge.

59.

Waxman

(2006). The coffee shop: Social and physical factors influencing place attachment. Journal of Interior Design, 31(3), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2006.tb00530.x

60.

Wright

(2012). From ‘third place’ to ‘third space’: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost—The Public, 19, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088