The effectiveness of an individual, conceptual instruction–based tuition program delivered by personal videoconferencing (PVC), compared to face–to–face (FtF) delivery for 30 upper primary and middle school students with mathematical learning difficulties (MLD), is described in this article. The experimental intervention targeted number sense, conceptual understandings of mathematical operations, and fluency with basic number facts. Results showed that significant improvements were achieved in accuracy on basic number fact tasks and standardized test results for both experimental groups. Implications for students with MLD living regionally and remotely are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsR. J., & KhooS. T. (1999). ACER QUEST: The interactive test analysis system. Camberwell, Vic: Australian College of Educational Research.
2.
Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER]. (2005). Progressive achievement tests in mathematics (3rd ed.). Melbourne: ACER Press.
3.
Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER]. (2010). Progressive achievement tests in mathematics plus. Melbourne: ACER Press.
4.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2008–2016). NAPLAN achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National reports for 2008–2016. Sydney: Author.
BaroodyA. J., BajwaN. P., & EilandM. (2009). Why can't Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.45
7.
BellertA. (2009). Narrowing the gap: A report on the QuickSmart mathematics intervention. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 171–183.
8.
ButlerF. M., MillerS. P., CrehanK., BabbittB., & PierceT. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 99–111.
9.
ButterworthB., & LaurillardD. (2011). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM, 42(6), 527(513).
10.
ChinnS., & AshcroftR. J. (2007). Mathematics for dyslexics including dyscalculia (3rd ed.). London: Whurr.
11.
ClarkeB., SmolkowskiK., BakerS. K., FienH., DoablerC. T., & ChardD. J. (2011). The impact of a comprehensive Tier I core kindergarten program on the achievement of students at risk in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 561–584.
12.
CohenJ. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CowanN., ElliottE. M., SaultsJ. S., MoreyC. C., MattoxS., HismjatullinaA., et al. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100.
14.
DavidC. V. (2012). Working memory deficits in math learning difficulties: A meta–analysis. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 58(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387711Y.0000000007
15.
DurlakJ. A. (2009). How to select, calculate and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928.
16.
EdwardsC., RuleA., & BoodyR. (2013). Comparison of face–to–face and online mathematics learning of sixth graders. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(1), 25–47.
EvansD. D. (2007). Developing mathematical proficiency in the Australian context: Implications for students with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 420–426.
19.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
20.
FrenchD. (2005). Double, double, double. Mathematics in School, 34(5), 8–9.
21.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., HamlettC. L., PowellS. R., CapizziA. M., & SeethalerP. M. (2006). The effects of computer–assisted instruction on number combination skill in at–risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467–475.
22.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., PowellS. R., SeethalerP. M., CirinoP. T., & FletcherJ. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/20528819
23.
FuchsL. S., PowellS. R., SeethalerP. M., CirinoP. T., FletcherJ. M., FuchsD., et al. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 561–576.
24.
FuchsL. S., PowellS. R., SeethalerP. M., CirinoP. T., FletcherJ. M., FuchsD., et al. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 89–100.
25.
GearyD. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.
26.
GearyD. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 130–133.
27.
GearyD., HoardM. K., & BaileyD. H. (2012). Fact retrieval deficits in low achieving children and children with mathematical learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 291–307.
28.
GerstenR., JordanN., & FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematical learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
29.
GinsburgH. P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 20–33.
30.
GrahamL., & BaileyJ. (2007). Learning disabilities and difficulties: An Australian conspectus–introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 386.
31.
GrahamL., BellertA., ThomasJ., & PeggJ. (2007). “QuickSmart”: A basic academic skills intervention for middle school students with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 410–419.
32.
GrahamL., & PeggJ. (2010). Hard data to support the effectiveness of QuickSmart Numeracy. Learning Difficulties Australia Bulletin, 42(1), 11–13.
33.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta–analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
34.
iVocalizeLLC. (2009). iVocalize Web Conference.
35.
JordanN., GluttingJ., & RamineniC. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88.
36.
KaufmannL., HandlP., & ThonyB. (2003). Evaluation of a numeracy intervention program focusing on basic numerical knowledge and conceptual knowledge: A pilot study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 564.
37.
KroesbergenE. H., & Van LuitJ. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta–analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97–114.
LocuniakM. N., & JordanN. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451.
40.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B. & MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
41.
MazzoccoM. M. M., FeigensonL., & HalberdaJ. (2011). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Development, 82(4), 1214–1224.
42.
MontagueM., WargerC., & MorganH. (2000). Solve it! Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 110–116.
43.
MurphyM. M., MazzoccoM. M. M., HanichL. B., & EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 458–478.
44.
PassolunghiM. C. (2011). Cognitive and emotional factors in children with mathematical learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58(1), 61–73.
45.
PowellS. R., FuchsL. S., & FuchsD. (2010). Embedding number–combinations practice within word–problem tutoring. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451210369516
46.
PowellS. R., FuchsL. S., FuchsD., CirinoP. T., & FletcherJ. M. (2009). Effects of fact retrieval tutoring on third–grade students with math difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(1), 1–11.
47.
PriceG. R., MazzoccoM. M., & AnsariD. (2013). Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 156–163.
48.
RoyerJ. M., & SinatraG. (1994). A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics. Educational Psychology Review, 6(2), 81–113.
49.
RoyerJ. M., & TronskyL. N. (1998). Addition practice with math disabled students improves subtraction and multiplication performance. Advances in Learning and Behavioural Disabilities, 12, 185–217.
50.
Science Information and Communication Technology and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia National Centre [siMERR]. (2009). Full report QuickSmart intervention research program: Using data 2001 – 2008. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.
51.
Science Information and Communication Technology and Mathematical Education in Rural and Regional Australia National Centre [siMERR]. (2008). An exceptional schooling outcomes project. Retrieved from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/research/currentprojects/aesop.htm
52.
SiMERRA National Research Centre. (2013). QuickSmart annual numeracy program report 2012. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.
53.
WestwoodP., & GrahamL. (2000). How many children with special needs in regular classes? Official predictions vs teachers’ perceptions in South Australia and New South Wales. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5(3), 24–35.
54.
WilsonA. J., & DehaeneS. (2007). Number sense and developmental dyscalculia. In CochD., DawsonG., & FischerK. W. (Eds.), Human behavior, learning, and the developing brain: Atypical development (pp. 212–238). New York: Guilford Press.
