Multi–tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) frameworks are designed to directly support students with, and at risk for, disabilities by providing timely, aligned, and coordinated supports, with the goal of preventing or ameliorating the effects of early risk. Yet developing and implementing MTSS in beginning reading is a complex process. Many schools encounter common barriers to achieving full and sustained implementation of MTSS systems and practices. The purpose of this article is to describe a state K–3 reading initiative that resulted in improved reading outcomes for K–3 students, including students at risk for reading disabilities. Specifically, this article describes a series of tools (i.e., activity timeline, whole group and small group templates, data grouping workbook) that helped teachers in the initiative to overcome barriers in order to ensure that tiered instruction met the needs of all students, including students with, and at risk for, reading disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al OtaibaS., FolsomJ. S., SchatschneiderC., WanzekJ., GreulichL., MeadowsJ., et al. (2011). Predicting first–grade reading performance from kindergarten response to tier 1 instruction. Exceptional Children, 77(4), 453–470.
2.
Al OtaibaS., Kosanovich–GrekM. L., TorgesenJ. K., HasslerL., & WahlM. (2005). Reviewing core kindergarten and first–grade reading programs in light of No Child Left Behind: An exploratory study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(4), 377–400.
3.
ArdenS. V., GandhiA. G., ZumetaR., & DanielsonL. (2017). Toward more effective tiered systems: Lessons from national implementation efforts. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917693565
4.
BaluR., ZhuP., DoolittleF., SchillerE., JenkinsJ., & GerstenR. (2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE 2016–4000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
5.
CoyneM. D., & HarnB. (2006). Promoting beginning reading success through meaningful assessment of early literacy skills. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20127.
6.
CoyneM. D., Kame'enuiE. J., & SimmonsD. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 62–73.
7.
CoyneM. D., OldhamA., DoughertyS. M., LeonardK., KoriakinT., GageN. A., et al. (2018). Evaluating the effects of supplemental reading intervention within an MTSS or RTI reading reform initiative using a regression discontinuity design. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 350–367.
8.
CoyneM. D., OldhamA., LeonardK., BurnsD., & GageN. (2016). Delving into the details: Implementing multi–tiered K–3 reading supports in high priority schools. In FoormanB. (Ed.), Challenges and solutions to implementing effective reading intervention in schools. New directions in child and adolescent development, Number 154 (pp. 67–85). New York: Wiley.
9.
FienH., SmithJ. L. M., SmolkowskiK., BakerS. K., NelsonN. J., & ChaparroE. (2015). An examination of the efficacy of a multitiered intervention on early reading outcomes for first grade students at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414521664
10.
FletcherJ. M., & VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention models as alternatives to traditional views of learning disabilities: Response to the commentaries. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00076.x
11.
FoormanB., BeylerN., BorradaileK., CoyneM., DentonC. A., DiminoJ., et al. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016–4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
12.
FuchsL. S., & FuchsD. (2009). On the importance of a unified model of responsiveness to intervention. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00074.x
13.
FuchsD., FuchsL. S., & ComptonD. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next–generation approach to multi–level prevention. Exceptional Children, 78 (3), 263–279.
14.
FuchsD., FuchsL. S., McMasterK. L., & LemonsC. J. (2018). Students with disabilities’ abysmal school performance: An introduction to the special issue. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 33(3), 127–130.
15.
FuchsD., FuchsL. S., & SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–322.
16.
GerstenR., ComptonD., ConnorC. M., DiminoJ., SantoroL., Linan–ThompsonS., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi–tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009–4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
17.
HarnB. A., ChardD. J., & Kame'enuiE. J. (2011). Meeting societies’ increased expectations through responsive instruction: The power and potential of systemwide approaches. Preventing School Failure, 55(4), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2010.548416.
18.
JonesS., BurnsD., & PirriC. (2010). Leading literacy change: Strategies and tools for administrators, teachers, and coaches. Dallas TX: Cambium Learning.
19.
Kame'enuiE. J., FuchsL., FrancisD. J., GoodR.III, O'ConnorR. E., SimmonsD. C, et al. (2006). The adequacy of tools for assessing reading competence: A framework and review. Educational Researcher, 35, 3−11.
20.
LembkeE., McMasterK. L., SteckerP. M. (2010). The prevention science of reading research within a response–to–intervention model. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20449
21.
LyonG. R., FletcherJ. M., ShaywitzS. E., ShaywitzB. A., TorgesenJ. K., WoodF. B., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In FinnC. E.Jr., RotherhamA. J., & HokansonC. R.Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
22.
Marchand–MartellaN. E., RubyS. F., & MartellaR. C. (2007). Intensifying reading instruction for students within a three–tier model: Standard–protocol and problem solving approaches within a Response–to–Intervention (RTI) system. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 3(5), n2.
